Image not available

760x510

201007-nobel-chem....jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Are women in stem a good thing?

Anonymous No. 16247346

Are women in stem a good thing?
Pic related are nobel prize laureats Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier who together discovered gene editing method based on crispr-cas9.
But there is one big thing.
There were two scientists who discovered it independently from them.
Virginijus Šikšnys who discovered it a week before them while not having caltech and max planck institution budgets.
And Feng Zhang who aslo independently made more superior version of this technology, that later was used by Chinese government for gene modified children. So these two women just ate research organisation's budget that could be used for more relevant people and stole nobel prize from men.

Anonymous No. 16247369

>discovered it a week before them
doubt
>Feng Zhang who also independently made more superior version of this technology
Not the first

Pretty weak OP

Anonymous No. 16247381

>>16247369
>doubt
You can check hoe, they both had less budget and people. Especially the balt

Anonymous No. 16247387

>>16247346
So you've dropped the "it's le evil west" angle after everyone in the last thread told you nobody hated Lithuanians because nobody had even thought about Lithuania?

Anonymous No. 16247701

>>16247346
The three fronts of modern science:
> female diversity hires from the west
> unkempt-beard eastern european professors
> Z.H.A.N.G. programme clone no. 00341288736

Anonymous No. 16248023

>>16247701
Holy kek

Anonymous No. 16248836

>>16247387
Are you polish or something?

Image not available

1000x1000

IMG_0472.jpg

Anonymous No. 16248886

>>16247346
No because women aren’t able to philosophize like men do. They take any information as fact and aren’t willing to argue against.

Plus women have an emotional bias if they FEEL strongly about something then it must be true. I’ve seen some of the most educated women create an illogical stance because how it made them feel.

Women are stupid point blank period. Caitlyn Jenner a man was named woman of the year on a magazine only read by women. And women said nothing that tells you all you need to know about them.

If the media says it’s ok then it’s ok for them.

Anonymous No. 16248917

>>16247369
>doubt
I dunno about this specific thing but that's pretty common

Anonymous No. 16248951

>>16247346
It's not their fault you can't get any pussy OP.

Anonymous No. 16249100

>>16248951
Why should op's ability to get pussy be correlated with unfairness of western academia?

Image not available

1070x1078

11546666498.jpg

Anonymous No. 16249182

>>16248886
>No because women aren’t able to philosophize like men do. They take any information as fact and aren’t willing to argue against.
Alone and sad, so dies the bitter man after many decades of endured pain.
Sad, many such cases

Anonymous No. 16249227

>>16249182
cringe, keep making copies of our memes like the braindead losers you are (you are literally using the Trump meme writing style)

evil (aka you) cannot create anything original, only pervert and corrupt

Anonymous No. 16249236

Women:

>why did men violently repressed us for thousands of years

this is why, you emasculate society to the point of extinction, at this point men are forced to submit you into sexual and motherhood slavery

and when that happens, you are going to love it, because its what your woman genes always have wanted

cope and seethe whores, your biggest fantasy is to be raped by me

Anonymous No. 16249238

>>16247346
No.
Thanks for the question.

Anonymous No. 16249715

>>16247369
It's totally real and legit. Also the chink made superior version, not the first

Image not available

589x475

1717793355561240.png

Anonymous No. 16250525

Hm, I don't know

Anonymous No. 16250528

It’s good if you’re looking for a wife in uni

Image not available

1119x1033

ARCR_40_2_Article....jpg

Anonymous No. 16250537

>>16250528
Really?

Anonymous No. 16251035

>>16249236
But at least women can feel safe

Anonymous No. 16251083

>>16247381
did virginijus discover it months before than he got the article rejected?
why are you saying a week?
IHATECAPTCHA

Anonymous No. 16251862

>>16249182
Takes one to know one, doesn't it, troon? Anyways, YWNBAW

Anonymous No. 16252105

>>16251083
Because women were accepted in 2 weeks, unlike virginijus I think

Anonymous No. 16252112

>>16247346
Intelligent women are a good thing, yes

Also women in STEM is not the same as angry radfems in politics

Anonymous No. 16252113

>>16247346
This is by far the lesser of two evils

You have a few (keyword few) women making things bad for both men and other women by creating stupid laws and allowing people's lives to be destroyed by them, meanwhile these two didn't do any of that

Anonymous No. 16252132

>>16252112
>>16252113
>Also women in STEM is not the same as angry radfems in politics
>these two didn't do any of that
They are part of the system that steals all real merits from men and eats funding because of muh inclusion and muh female power

Anonymous No. 16252358

>>16250525
But she is a goood reseeeearvher aaaaa

Anonymous No. 16252713

>>16252112
It is, man

Anonymous No. 16253089

>>16249182
When did you have transition?

Anonymous No. 16253112

>>16253089
I'm sorry, if you want some ladyboys you're going to have to go to Thailand.

Anonymous No. 16254299

>>16253112
Does your crotch smell like fish?

Anonymous No. 16254307

>>16254299
No but ask your mom what my dick smells like, she'll know.

Anonymous No. 16254372

>>16254307
>Implying your micro peepee will seduce any women

Anonymous No. 16254421

>>16252112
>>Also women in STEM is not the same as angry radfems in politics
they are, women control the bureaucracy, the academia and the marketing departments

Anonymous No. 16254436

>>16254372
She was screaming my name all night it was so big.

Anonymous No. 16254817

>>16254436
>it was so big
Haha, you made my day. I love fantasy worlds

Sage No. 16254837

>>16254817
I know, jealousy can be a difficult thing to accept.

Anonymous No. 16254933

I'm waiting for any fucking proof

but obviously there won't be

Incels just enjoy lying and misrepresenting "society"

Anonymous No. 16254948

>>16254933
You can find sources in references, whore
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginijus_%C5%A0ik%C5%A1nys

Anonymous No. 16255091

>>16254948
this isnt a source for ANYTHING

its JUST a WIKIPEDIA page of a DUDE

Quit trying to manipulate people just because you hate women you paki freak

Anonymous No. 16255150

>>16255091
>its JUST a WIKIPEDIA page of a DUDE
>Doesn't know how to use references
Women people are wild

Anonymous No. 16255223

>>16255150
You are retarded. Sorry you dont have an sources for your bullshit, keep it to yourself next time

Anonymous No. 16255285

>>16255223
>Could not find not hidden source
>Haha you are retarded

Anonymous No. 16255711

>>16247346
As long as men are the ones who gets to decide where the research goes, yes.

Anonymous No. 16256011

>>16255711
Wdym?

Anonymous No. 16256022

>>16247346
Why obsess over gender?

I'm sorry someone hurt you

Anonymous No. 16256052

>>16256022
>Women steal achievements and fuck up tasks more
>Women have hurted you haha

Anonymous No. 16256459

>>16249238
This

Anonymous No. 16256888

>>16256052
But muh equality

Anonymous No. 16257011

This is just life. Scientific advances tend to be made by several people at the same time (even if they are not aware of each other) . Who cares about the Nobel and other prizes anyway. Real people recognize good work for what it is and leave it at that.

Anonymous No. 16257572

>>16257011
>justifies inefficient allocation of resources and female stupidity

Anonymous No. 16257777

>>16247346
Good enough, we all knew government employees mutilate people who themselves looked good with grim smile

Anonymous No. 16257880

>>16257777
No

Anonymous No. 16258700

>>16256022
Why saying something red is red is an obsession

Anonymous No. 16259479

>>16247346
Women rights were a mistake

Anonymous No. 16260136

>>16259479
Yes, we realised it only now

Anonymous No. 16260148

>>16247346

As long as they aren't incredibly ugly or very fat, because that means they're compensating and their drive is partially driven by spite.

Anonymous No. 16260360

>>16249236
Pretty sure they were repressed because they were useless as manual laborers and had a high chance of dying in childbirth. There was really no other choice for pre-industrial society.

Anonymous No. 16260382

>>16247346
Women in stem are good because the more work than can be done the better, and women are generally just as intelligent as men.

The Nobel prize is basically a Euro-scientist circlejerk. These people are not geniuses and should not be idealized.

Anonymous No. 16260581

>>16260382
>women are generally just as intelligent as men
The biggest lie of feminism

Anonymous No. 16261096

>>16260148
>t.Coomer

Anonymous No. 16261498

>>16256052
Female power

Anonymous No. 16261688

>>16260581
anon, women have one thing men dont and its effort, they put the triple of effort and that will always be a good thing. Men take shit for granted and it can be counterproductive, thats why many high IQ people arent doing shit worthy for humanity development.
Stop being a mysoginist faggot, if you think only men are good then go back to /gif/

Image not available

496x591

aggressive twumim....jpg

Anonymous No. 16261697

Anonymous No. 16261716

>>16261688
>Bu bu but they try, and some smart people said they are good so we should do what we want
>You are incel because you are not in mainstream hahahhah

Anonymous No. 16262377

>>16261697
Twat bros.. we won

Anonymous No. 16262905

>>16255285
Retarded people are too common on sci

Anonymous No. 16263683

>>16250537
Vgh, trad college education

Anonymous No. 16263768

>>16255285
>>16262905
Right. Just make a shit flinging thread, never provide a source, and act like anything you wrote is reality. Then bump the thread every day because youre an isolated misogynistic loser

Image not available

1080x407

Oopsie.jpg

Anonymous No. 16264123

>>16263768
Hahaha, I didn't bump anything I just wrote my opinion. But I can tell you that wiki page that guy posted had source to some German journalist in references who gave these evidences. If you actually read that article and didn't scream misogyny to everyone you could find even his name and find some peace with yourself. But again you are too dumb to do some brainpower, mr misogyny detector

Anonymous No. 16264543

>>16261697
What is her endgame?

Anonymous No. 16265297

>>16261688
I see at least two logical mistakes in your statement

Anonymous No. 16265718

>>16252132
It's all according to plan

Anonymous No. 16266400

>>16262377
No we didn't

Anonymous No. 16266633

>>16247346
>Are women in stem a good thing?
"No!"

Anonymous No. 16266659

>>16247701
Don't forget the scamming low tier midwit diploma mill jeets

Anonymous No. 16266663

>>16252112
>Intelligent women are a good thing

They're really not. They just turn into elaborate BPD whores rather than dumb NPC whores.

Anonymous No. 16266687

>>16247346
>mass retarded media talk about two women in science
>noooooo no no no nooooooooo that's not possible, I've got to find a penis or two in this story, women are nothing, do nothing without men
>I know, I'll invent a based man, I'll make him Russo-Serbo something from Eastern Europe and make him the man who really discovered/invented what these two diabolical women proclaim.
>That's it! I'm doing it! I've saved the penises!

Every time

Anonymous No. 16267102

>>16266687
The most educated American

Anonymous No. 16267184

>>16247346
>Children: 0
They never experienced womanhood so I would say they're honorary men.

Anonymous No. 16267242

>>16267184
*Honorary retarded and parasitic men

Anonymous No. 16267468

>>16254837
>>16254436
>>16254307
t. pindick beta

Anonymous No. 16267603

>>16252112
Intelligent women pursuing careers instead of having children is a bad thing.

Anonymous No. 16267928

>>16267603
This

Anonymous No. 16268152

>>16250537
those numbers seem way too low

Anonymous No. 16268647

>>16268152
They also included prudes

Image not available

680x435

1591549526883.png

Anonymous No. 16269015

Women on leaves are a good thing.

Anonymous No. 16269016

>>16268647
Prudes...

Always leveling statistics

Anonymous No. 16269093

>>16266687
But he really did discover it first.but their paoer was published first, because they have an extra hole between their legs. While the journal rejected the paper of a lithuanian a month before for no reason aka he didn't communicate the significance of his paper (as if it's not the reason journals exist). And bitches got noble prize despite not being the first ones. It's like some black female would create insulin now and would get a npble prize, while the guy who discovered it in the past didn't.

Anonymous No. 16269958

>>16269016
Yes, they are chill though

Anonymous No. 16269982

>>16264543
She was a diversity hire on her first day. She lasted a week or some crap

Image not available

661x406

woman astronaut.png

Anonymous No. 16269989

>>16247346
>Are women in X a good thing
If X is not "kitchen" or "bedroom", the answer is a solid NO

Anonymous No. 16270281

>>16269016
Go back to /gif/

Anonymous No. 16270514

>>16269989
I want to cum inside her

Anonymous No. 16271068

>>16269015
No

Anonymous No. 16271310

>>16271068
Yes. It means they'll have fewer opportunities to mess things up.