🧵 This was a crazy hot week
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:06:00 UTC No. 16247707
- about 1400 temperature records around the globe were broken, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- dozens of bodies were discovered in Delhi during a two-day stretch, from sweltering heat and humidity
- over 1000 pilgrims died on they way to Mecca from the temperatures that reached 51+ Celcius (125F)
- June is already all but sure to set a 13th-consecutive monthly global average temperature record
- All week long, “exceptional” conditions, conditions that would have been rare or even impossible in a world without climate change, could be found across much of Africa, the Middle East, southern Europe and southeast Asia
- surging air conditioning demand crippled power grids in Albania and Kuwait, and at the same time crypto mining and AI centers are sucking the power grids dry too
- heat waves like the one currently unfolding in the United States are now roughly 2 to 3 degrees Celsius (3 to 5 degrees Fahrenheit) hotter
- strong hurricanes are at least 14 percent wetter because the warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture
- storm surges are unfolding in oceans that are in some places more than a foot higher than they were half a century ago
Climate scientists have been predicting the end of El Niño will bring a global cooling trend, but they haven’t seen it arrive yet. El Niño dissipated earlier this month, and it's not looking like there'll be a La Niña this year.
This all happened before summer started, yesterday.
This summer is expected to be cooler than last year's thought, so rejoice and hope that that prediction is accurate. I hope your power grids don't fail or your obese asses will cook themselves inside your very homes with no AC.
Is everyone ready for the long, multi-year ride ahead? This is only getting started.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 18:18:09 UTC No. 16247864
>>16247707
>I hope your power grids don't fail or your obese asses will cook themselves inside your very homes with no AC.
so...
>be me last night
>do 4km power walk to grocery store in 30C weather at dusk, only buying low-glycemic foods
>get workout doing 4km farmers walk carrying 10kg of groceries back home
>my ice vest didn't totally melt before my walk ended
>Is everyone ready for the long, multi-year ride ahead? This is only getting started.
close enough? still working on that thermoelectric vest
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 18:25:30 UTC No. 16247884
>>16247707
>crypto mining
What a waste of energy desu.
>it's not looking like there'll be a La Niña this year
It takes a bit of time for it do develop, so we'll have to wait and see. One thing for sure - the stability of the Holocene is over.
I'm more concerned about the food supply in the coming years.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 18:31:24 UTC No. 16247895
A bunch of shitskins died, oh no...
Next.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 18:33:25 UTC No. 16247899
>>16247707
>temperatures made twice likely to occur
It doesn't say hot or cold though?
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 18:37:12 UTC No. 16247907
Ya know, it's well known that we've been controlling the weather for multiple decades now.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 19:14:48 UTC No. 16247966
>>16247899
>It doesn't say hot or cold though?
it did not specify, but given the context, I assume it was hot temperatures.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 19:30:07 UTC No. 16247984
Ok. What do you want me to do about it?
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:12:18 UTC No. 16248022
>>16247707
>number of days with temperatures made twice as likely to occur by climate change
This is a meaningless sentence which assumes it's own premise.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:15:35 UTC No. 16248033
>>16247707
Temperature readings look normal according to weather history. Where was this 120 temp located?
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:25:04 UTC No. 16248058
>>16247707
blow your ass out
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:28:10 UTC No. 16248068
>>16247984
I want you to drive your car and have fun
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:37:22 UTC No. 16248084
>>16247864
>30C weather at dusk
uff, where are you at, if you don't mind me asking.
>my ice vest
woah, that's some sci-fi shit! nice.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:38:24 UTC No. 16248085
>>16247884
>I'm more concerned about the food supply in the coming years.
Same, I've been investing in wheat, the most sensttive of all crops. Bring on the shortages, I'm ready.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:40:06 UTC No. 16248087
>>16247984
Not supporting fools is a good place to start.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 21:10:21 UTC No. 16248148
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 21:20:06 UTC No. 16248171
>>16248085
Same here with rice.
The goal is to store around 100kg - that should last me half a year. In the "long term", I'm placing my hopes in agroforestry and/or permaculture/silvopasture. Also, remember to rotate your reserves so they won't go to waste.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 21:33:34 UTC No. 16248204
>>16248084
near the capital of Burgerstan
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 22:11:31 UTC No. 16248269
>>16248148
No one said heat waves didn't happen before, but they happen now more frequently, and they are also hotter on average,
It seems that the liar is you, anon? Or perhaps, let's not assume malice, and just assume you are ignorant.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 22:12:32 UTC No. 16248270
>>16248171
Oh, I meant buying ETFs
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 22:13:09 UTC No. 16248273
>>16248269
Nice backpedaling.
>This heat wave is unprecedented!
>well errr uhhh actually it isn't and we've had worse before but they happen more often now, trust us!
Scientists are no longer worthy of trust due to marrying their cause to leftist politics.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 22:36:39 UTC No. 16248312
>>16248273
>This heat wave is unprecedented!
>This heat wave
What exactly are you referring to? The OP's post is about a conjunction of multiple heat waves all over the world.
Precision, please.
>well errr uhhh actually it isn't and we've had worse before but they happen more often now, trust us!
From the OP's post itself:
>“exceptional” conditions, conditions that would have been rare
Again, the disingenuous, ignorant, or stupid, is you.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 22:40:41 UTC No. 16248321
>>16248312
Nobody buys the pilpul anymore. You went too far with it and blew it.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 22:41:15 UTC No. 16248322
>>16247707
Are pumpkin crops fucked this year ? I swear my grandfather used to plant seeds around this time
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 23:02:09 UTC No. 16248374
>>16248321
>Nobody buys the pilpul anymore. You went too far with it and blew it.
Nah, nah, nah, don't turn this around: you posted a disingenuous and erroneous image. Admit it or fuck off, narcissist.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 23:04:43 UTC No. 16248379
>>16248322
>Are pumpkin crops fucked this year ?
Not that I know of, but chocolate was a great ride this year, oh shit, it was.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 23:41:49 UTC No. 16248445
>>16247899
The overwhelming majority were hot, look it up yourself if you don't believe me.
>>16247895
(You)'re next
>>16247984
Vote out denialniggers, cut your energy usage
>>16248022
How does it have a premise and be meaningless at the same time kek
>>16248058
Seething denialnigger
>>16248087
I voted for him twice before but I might actually go with biden just for climate shit, despite how fucking horrible he is. Also the few good things about Trump don't matter anymore.
>>16248148
Fucking LOL, you lying retards never cease to amaze me. 90 degrees is not some magic threshold.
>>16248270
Won't the profitability of grain producers drop despite the increased commodity price? Or are you doing shit with futures
>>16248269
Denialniggers are both satan-tied liars AND deeply retarded. It's quite impressive.
>>16248321
I agree, that's why you should give up your larp campaign and kill yourself.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 00:25:33 UTC No. 16248499
>>16248445
>I voted for him twice before but I might actually go with biden just for climate shit, despite how fucking horrible he is.
I think Biden will actually have policies on climate change in his second term than Trump in his second term.
Let me explain; neither of them have pledged any large investments into renewables in the next 4 years so from that standpoint they're equal.
A big issue is that the average American produces a lot of co2 in their daily lives. Trump's hard border policies with sending people back will reduce global co2 emissions because those who immigrated here will produce less co2 in their home countries than what they do here in the US.
Thirdly the Biden admit has repeatedly thrown Tesla under the buss and Tesla is the most important company in the US regarding reducing co2 emissions with electric vehicles, home battery storage solutions, their grid sized electricity storage systems and their charging network. Trump is much more positive to Tesla.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 00:58:37 UTC No. 16248538
>>16248445
Take your meds.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 01:28:12 UTC No. 16248574
>>16248499
Imagine what they warming alarmists are going to think when all institutions and administrations in the entire world give up the global warming lie because they already got mass immigration in the west.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 07:27:42 UTC No. 16248911
>>16248445
>Won't the profitability of grain producers drop despite the increased commodity price? Or are you doing shit with futures
I'm buying actual grain ETFs, not producer (industry) ETFs. It is a bet on the acutal commodity price, so if the price of wheat goes up from potential shortages, I intend on cashing out then.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 08:35:15 UTC No. 16248966
>>16248499
go to /pol/ if you want to shill politics
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 21:54:49 UTC No. 16249946
>>16247707
if it's getting hot in here, why don't you take off all your clothes? That seems to me the most optimal solution females should adopt to manage the effects of globel warning.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 22:07:07 UTC No. 16249958
Whatever happened to HAARP? Did that conspiracy theory become obsolete?
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 22:13:02 UTC No. 16249964
>>16247707
>>16248022
>>16248445
Not him and I'm sure whatever the data in the graph is it's being accurately represented, but that title has to be a typo or something. I have no idea what what graph is meant to convey because the title is the missing data I need to parse their metric.