Image not available

1120x659

4xlbm7.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16248376

Will lab grown meat replace unsustainable cattle farming? Pasture collapse has caused meat prices to skyrocket and consumers are looking for alternatives to environmentally harmful cattle.

Anonymous No. 16248382

>>16248376
Yes 100%, it will be done simply because it will be more productive in the end

Anonymous No. 16248387

>>16248376
>lab grown meat replace unsustainable cattle farming
only for the poors
the rich will continue to eat real meat

Anonymous No. 16248402

>environmentally harmful cattle
imagine actually believing this

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16248412

>>16248376
I doubt it'll ever become cost efficient without some kind of carcinogenic shortcut. People will just eat less meat and what they will eat will be raised regeneratively. I already go out of my way (Pay 3x as much) to eat grass fed bison.
>>16248402
Kill yourself retard

Anonymous No. 16248432

Yep most likely in the not too distant future.
Consumers(slaves) will do what they're told by the government, all they'll need to say is "real meat is now banned!!"
And then release a several biased WEF funded studies showing how great lab grown meat is compared to real meat and 95% of normies will listen.

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16248438

>>16248432
>And then release a several biased WEF funded studies
Meds, now. I'm tired of retarded niggers like you injecting nonsense into everything. There are way more important liberties being taken away and spending out over WEF larp doesn't do anything useful.

Image not available

217x232

GOehjN_WQAA1Upt.png

Anonymous No. 16248447

>>16248382

Anonymous No. 16248457

>>16248438
food is the essence of a healthy human body anon, once they start feeding us bug/insect slop it's over for us normal people.
the elite will be laughing at us malnourished human filth while they're still eating premium seafood and animals.

Anonymous No. 16248458

>>16248376
10/10. No notes.

Image not available

600x677

6a01156e4c2c3d970....png

Anonymous No. 16248459

>>16248376
>Will lab grown meat replace unsustainable cattle farming?

Some of it, yes, absolutely, but the market niche of grass-fed, organic, 'artisanal' livestock would always remain for affluent types, as would the market desire for common people to continue consuming "beef from a cow wot died".
The much bigger world changing attribute of lab grown meat has got to be cloning tissue (like skin), organs, organ scaffolding (literally fabricate yourself a bigger cock, balls, tits, better heart, etc), and the general 1st world end of the brutal and savage medical practice of organ transplants from dead/living people.

>>16248402
>>16248412
>imagine actually believing this
>Kill yourself retard

There's shades to this called 'Niche Partitioning '.
North America was once a cold savahna, so it's native grasses are actually used to, and very comfortable with, being grazed by a large selection of herbivores such as bison, deer, and antelope, but also elephants and zebras (not to mention sub-species within those brackets like long-horn vs short horn bison, mastodons vs mammoths) - but then like I said before they desire a selection. I think the farmer's term for this is "different animals cut the grass at different lengths", but the idea is lots of herbivores will ironically graze a land significantly more *evenly than if there were just one - due to overlap, competition, etc..

*Another more "lived" example of this you Anons might be more familiar with is Kudzu. Kudzu, "the vine that ate the south", is 100% completely edible from top to bottom: the vines, leaves, roots, flowers, they're all edible and completely defenseless. But then this plant has spread, uncontested, across the southern states, why? Tldr; No elk, no peccary, no antelope, no moose, just white tailed deer, and white tailed deer won't cut it no matter how many millions there are.

Anonymous No. 16248477

>>16248432
> 95% of normies will listen
Other 5% will start hunting, leading to 100% loss of all wild animals, and then once they have all been eaten people will start going missing.

Anonymous No. 16248515

>>16248457
>they start feeding us
Hold up, wait a minute.
That's how it worked since the advent of agriculture. You can't complain about them feeding you X if you're dependant on the very same system.

Anonymous No. 16248532

>>16248376
you can keep grazing pasture healthy with proper management.
the greatest issue of all in agriculture is that greedy and ignorant people have become the wardens of our food production. the same people who keep silver coins and buy lottery tickets.
I actually welcome all those environmentally-focused fascists to take on homesteading and food production. I'd trade all the refugees for that and I wouldn't mind paying them subsidies.

Anonymous No. 16248536

>>16248387
that's good enough for me.

Anonymous No. 16248537

>>16248515
>You can't complain about them feeding you X if you're dependant on the very same system.
I can't remember ever having been offered a choice on this.

Anonymous No. 16248562

>>16248376
That image is photoshopped, the reality is the reverse. Cattle farming is optimal for marginal land. Rotating livestock prevents overgrazing, while fertilizing the land, resulting in healthier biomes.

Anonymous No. 16248593

>>16248562
the image is 100% real. the cows ate all the grass, you can even see cow hoof prints on the right side whereas the left side is pristine untouched grassland except for tire tracks. rangers have to drive up and down these fields to keep voracious cows from jumping over the fence.

Anonymous No. 16248606

>>16248477
Tongue in cheek

Anonymous No. 16248612

>>16248376
>Will lab grown meat replace unsustainable cattle farming?
We can't even lab grow medically relevant tissue lol

And your premise is wrong, farming yields at this rate might never make this relevant. Lab-grown meat will be used for health and quality reasons, not on price

Anonymous No. 16248627

>>16248532
Bravo.

Anonymous No. 16248632

>>16248459
muh dik-dik

Anonymous No. 16248703

fag

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16248843

>>16248703
nigger

Anonymous No. 16248857

>>16248376
>Will lab grown meat replace unsustainable cattle farming?
you kinda answered your own question. Is there is demand and it's cheaper than regular meat, yes. Is that not obvious?

Image not available

1076x1159

Screenshot_202406....jpg

Anonymous No. 16248878

>>16248376
OP is a faggot liar or a faggot baiter.
https://foodplanetprize.org/initiatives/the-savory-institute-re-greening-grasslands-through-grazing/

https://www.patagonia.com/stories/a-blueprint-for-cooling-earth/story-71916.html

Left is grazed land, right is ungrazed

Anonymous No. 16248898

>>16248878
take your meds schizo

Anonymous No. 16248922

>>16248898
shut the fuck up, you vegan faggot. That anon is a hero for even bothering and you're the typical lump of shit that is killing imageboards

Anonymous No. 16248938

>>16248922
Calm down anon, I was just trying to create a amiable and intellectual discussion on the advantages of lab grown meat over tradition cattle farming. The picture in the OP was merely chosen to illustrate my point and was never intended to be used as evidence. Apologies for the confusion.

Image not available

640x640

4646864.jpg

Anonymous No. 16248946

>>16248878

Anonymous No. 16248982

>>16248376
>contaminated with antibiotics
>contaminated with growth factors
>contaminated with mutagens
i will pass
i just wont eat meat,just eggs

Anonymous No. 16248985

>>16248878
Why are people intentionally manipulating with this kind of information.
They are poisoning the well.

>>16248938
nah mate you are getting paid for this.
there is nothing intellectually do discus, visit any lab in this field or read a research paper and see how the sausage is made metaphorically speaking.

Anonymous No. 16248986

>>16248376
Farmers who think that they don't have to fertilize their pastures are to blame.

Anonymous No. 16249030

>>16248986
See
>>16248878
Farmers don't have to fertilise their pasture if they graze their animals properly.

Anonymous No. 16249106

>>16248938
>The picture in the OP was merely chosen to illustrate my point and was never intended to be used as evidence.
How does it illustrate your point when it is completely contrary to reality? If you have to lie to make your point, then perhaps you don't actually have the point you think you do.

Anonymous No. 16249109

And people think "farming" is somehow good for the environment when its literally the same as bulldozing it for fucking subburbs

Anonymous No. 16249181

>>16249109
This. Farming is often more destructive than strip mining.

Anonymous No. 16249197

>>16249181
after strip mining is done they push the dirt back and its fine

After 100 years of farming all that is left is desert

Image not available

634x356

1679716891551502 ....gif

Anonymous No. 16249289

>>16248376
Wilderness side only grows cause a millenia of buffalo dung is in the sorghum.
Fences were a mistake
Should substitute for patriot rancher drone swarms

Anonymous No. 16249290

>>16249109
>>16249181
>>16249197
Gullible retards
See
>>16248878

Anonymous No. 16249299

>>16249289
In what context was this ever produced?

Image not available

1080x1623

Screenshot_202406....jpg

Anonymous No. 16249317

>>16249299
Pic related pretty much
Plus wanting to learn how to make gifs with gimp

You should see version 2.99
I got a fibonacci script-fu too

Anonymous No. 16249327

>>16248376
Only for human cattle.

>>16248382
Cattle.

Anonymous No. 16249359

>>16249030
No, it isn't enough, because wild animals alao fertilize it with their carcasses, you need to replace at least that with fertilizers.

Anonymous No. 16249364

>>16248878
>>16249290
Retard take