🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:10:49 UTC No. 16249331
I identified a new imaginary integer. I'm gonna call it froag.
>in between 0 and 1
>not greater than or equal to 0
>not less than or equal to 1
normally the number line is like this
>-7, -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
here I list 15 numbers
pairs opposite of zero cancel to zero
add these all up you also get zero
here is the same number line, but with froag added
>-7, -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, froag, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
same 15, but now there's froag
pairs opposite of froag cancel to one
add all these you get zero plus froag which is equal to froag
I want to build a trinary froagian computer that represents froag in its circuitry, what's a reliable way to do it?
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:13:00 UTC No. 16249335
>>16249331
>>in between 0 and 1
>>not greater than or equal to 0
you contradicted yourself
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:17:08 UTC No. 16249341
I just invented "the wizard" number
it's between froag and thrembo and cancels itself when divided by based department
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:18:26 UTC No. 16249344
>>16249335
I don't know how to define froag, except that it occupies an imaginary space between zero and one. you can, for example, have something like froag.5, which, when subtracted from froag gives you .5.
>>16249341
sar please this is a pure math thread
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:18:28 UTC No. 16249345
>>16249331
froag is a based number
froagfroagfroag
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:19:27 UTC No. 16249348
>>16249344
>-.5
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:20:37 UTC No. 16249350
>>16249345
What are the based numbers ?
i know "2" is one of them but not much else is known about based numbers.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:20:58 UTC No. 16249352
>>16249344
what does 'pairs opposite of froag cancel to one' mean
additively or multiplicatively? also is froag cancels to one then how is it differnet from any other real number? and why is the number line integers instead of reals?
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:22:11 UTC No. 16249355
>>16249350
six is a based number, so is 2002 and 2006 is based
not much else is known that is correct
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:26:56 UTC No. 16249371
>>16249355
So 2, 6, 2002 and 2006
What's the pattern here ?
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:28:50 UTC No. 16249379
>>16249371
not enough data for interpolation
maybe one day terence tao will bless our basedmath with basedanalysis and give us more information on basednumbers
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:31:58 UTC No. 16249385
>>16249352
Additively. I called it imaginary and not real because it has all the properties of a real number, but there is no real number to my knowledge that is
>not less than or equal to zero
>and
>not greater than or equal to one
you can have 2 times froag or 2froag, but there isn't a way to represent froag itself on a conventional computer. My plan is to make a froagian computer that can support froag so that regular arithmetic can by offset appropriately by the existence of froag integer.
I'm retarded but I can make computers.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:33:42 UTC No. 16249388
>>16249331
>not greater than or equal to 0
>not less than or equal to 1
>{x | x < 0}
>{x | x > 1}
>but (x | x > 0 and x < 1)
Contradiction.