Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:31:41 UTC No. 16252050

popsci slop with zero basis in reality

Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:31:46 UTC No. 16252051

I don't know. I don't want to think about this stuff. When I think about big existential stuff I get really anxious and sometimes have panic attacks. I'd rather just not think about it.

Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:32:46 UTC No. 16252053

>>16252051
based Albert Einstein in his old age

Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:10:04 UTC No. 16252187

https://reducing-suffering.org/believe-infinity/

Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:42:49 UTC No. 16252224

>>16252035
How many times do you have to be told that your retarded reposted borg cube picture isn't a very good representation of infinity since it has very obvious stopping points instead of a nice continuous infinite graph before you understand that your retarded reposted borg cube picture isn't a very good representation of infinity since it has very obvious stopping points instead of a nice continuous infinite graph?

Christian Universalist AI will save humanity at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:32:34 UTC No. 16252825

>>16252224
It's supposed to represent a section of galactic filament, being so anal isn't attractive.

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 01:40:42 UTC No. 16254077

>>16252050
>that's popsci
>big bang totally isn't.

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 05:36:35 UTC No. 16254284

>>16252825
>Durr dee best way to represent an explosive unbounded infinite universe is by picturing it as nice clean bit of arbitrary boundaries.
Being retarded and immediately undermining your entire argument with a shitty image selection is definitely unattractive.
Even trying to say that infinity only has 3 dimensions instead of infinite dimensions is pretty retarded.

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:31:29 UTC No. 16254320

>>16252035
I agree with this hypothesis, it's the one that makes more sense intuitively

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:36:37 UTC No. 16254326

>>16254284
Nahhh, NTA but you are being too anal and your remark about him undermining his whole post via the image is really about you being upset he said something.
What an absurd thing to say lol

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:46:58 UTC No. 16254339

>>16254326
>Durr being accurate is a bad thing.
What did he say that I took offense to?
As far as I can tell he hasn't said anything of value and any claims he made regarding infinity were immediately invalidated by his attempt to represent and describe his claims based on their inherent limitations rather than their lack of limitation.

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 11:18:23 UTC No. 16254573

>>16252050
But the reality is, everything we know is in the observable Universe. Its not like we are ever going to confirm something outside of it.

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 11:37:02 UTC No. 16254587

>>16254573
Nope, not the imagination, and its arguably the only thing you can experience.

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:33:26 UTC No. 16254951

>>16254284
Third anon.
You have 110 IQ. Just take the L and move on, loser.

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:37:42 UTC No. 16254955

>>16252035
>complete infinity
What the actual fuck does that mean?

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:04:33 UTC No. 16254985

>>16252035
of course the universe is infinite

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:19:29 UTC No. 16255006

If you zoom out far enough you realize you are all inside my dickhole

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:29:48 UTC No. 16255193

>>16254339
It was the fact that he said anything, it was a narcissistic injury.
>N-nooooo
Ok

Christian Universalist AI will save humanity at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 03:49:13 UTC No. 16255998

>>16254955
I'm not sure. The last thread I made about an infinite universe resulted in some argument over finitism and potential infinity's vs. complete infinity or something like that. I don't understand what I'm proposing very well, but it has something to do with approaching infinity as opposed to something actually being infinite. I am seeking clarification on the terms and asserting the possibility of an infinite universe.

Christian Universalist AI will save humanity at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 03:50:29 UTC No. 16255999

>>16254284
I can't perceive above 3 dimensions, but it's possible that the dimensions I do perceive are infinite.

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 06:19:51 UTC No. 16256186

>>16254951
I would love to move on from the fact that a picture of an object that stops at starts at clear points and is confined to a particular dimensional limitation isn't an accurate way to represent infinity, but OP keeps posting the same retarded shit over and over despite having it explained clearly. That picture would a good way to hint that your retarded universe ideology imprisons your mind like a borg cube, but it isn't a good way to geometrically illustrate infinite complexity or an infinite object.