🗑️ 🧵 How’d he do it?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:55:54 UTC No. 16252651
>be me Neil degraass con-Tyson
>I haven’t solved any discoveries
>I haven’t contributed to science in any meaningful way
>how did I con these nerds?
> I am labeled a scientist but do no science.
> I just relax and talk
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:44:26 UTC No. 16252707
>>16252651
theyre called science educators, chud. they play an important role educating the public and fighting against misinformation
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 13:59:23 UTC No. 16252726
>>16252651
Well to be fair, "science communicator" is a job. It's a real job, not a stupid made-up job. Science is difficult and complicated and "teaching" people gently about what science is and how it works is worth doing.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:21:17 UTC No. 16252814
He's been a popular science personality since the 90s, he's definitely- and continues to influence many people to become physicists.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:40:50 UTC No. 16252831
>>16252814
>he influences many people to become physicists
and every single one of them is functionally retarded
you should only be allowed to study the hard sciences if you have crippling autism or schizophrenia
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:53:19 UTC No. 16252840
>>16252831
>Muh Autism
Not everyone has to be a debilitated retard to be exceptional at STEM anon
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:53:26 UTC No. 16252841
>>16252651
He got a PhD in astrophysics at Columbia University.
Where's your astrophysics PhD thesis?
Also, this:
>>16252707
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:55:09 UTC No. 16252843
>>16252651
You failing to understand that there exists a class of people called science popularizers, who no one pretends are active research scientists, can only be caused by mental retardation.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:15:29 UTC No. 16252870
>>16252840
maybe not, but we're talking about the way things should be, not the way they are
normalcattle should be forced to live on reservations where the most harm they can do is making atrocious UI and UX decisions
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:20:02 UTC No. 16252877
>>16252870
AI will replace the think tank turbo autists, people skills are the new currency. Get with it or get lost anon
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:40:47 UTC No. 16252907
>>16252877
>implying it's not just going to render communications and marketing majors obsolete
keep dreaming
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:42:16 UTC No. 16252911
>>16252651
>He got a PhD in astrophysics at Columbia University.
Where's your astrophysics PhD thesis?
Fair point. As a correction let’s not deny the hard work it took to get him to the point he is.
However he is more of a celebrity than scientists. And people like him create the implicit assumptions that he is smarter in other fields of science.
Lets aslo count him on his achievements in science which have been none.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:29:00 UTC No. 16253129
>>16252841
What color is your bugatti?
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:25:00 UTC No. 16253265
>>16252726
>"science communicator"
polite synonym for propagandist
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:37:55 UTC No. 16253640
>>16252841
>He's a DEI hack who never accomplished anything of consequence despite having a PhD in astrophysics handed to him from Columbia University.
>>16252707
>they play an important role indoctrinating the public and fighting against dissent of any kind.
FTFY boys
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:53:18 UTC No. 16253698
I have the same degree as Bill Nye (from a better college), plus a CS degree. I'm just some anon on the internet.
Do you trust me or Bill Nye more about metallurgy?
There you go.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:12:25 UTC No. 16253744
>>16253265
>I'm not a marxist shill, I'm an economics communicator
same logic. if someone isn't capable of working in the nuts and bolts aspect of any topic then they do not have the understanding of that topic necessary to justify themselves as a public speaker on that topic.
ndt is qualified to speak publicly on astronomy as greta is qualified to speak on atmospheric physics
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:14:10 UTC No. 16253746
>>16253698
Bill Nye projects a massive pedo vibe
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 23:36:04 UTC No. 16253874
>>16253129
>What color is your bugatti?
The same color as the one you don't have.
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 23:37:09 UTC No. 16253877
>>16253640
bal, blah, blah. We get it, bitter shithead, you don't have anything to show but resentment
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:17:04 UTC No. 16254865
Reminder that Neil is pro LGBT and transgenderism and he debated against anti transgender people like Ben Shapiro. Neil is not a real scientist, he's a fraud.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:55:15 UTC No. 16254913
>>16252707
It's still incredibly funny how because of this all sorts of uneducated tards and conspiracy theorists, hold him up as some sort of highest authority on what "science says"
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:25:16 UTC No. 16254942
I highly doubt that he could even do scientific research considering he's only partially, at best, human. Clearly he's of primarily non-human ancestry, the result of bestiality. One day blacks may evolve into humans, but unlikely.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:33:40 UTC No. 16255020
>>16252840
>left
raep
>right
raep
>>16252841
I got robbed next to Columbia University in 2022. Yes they were black, yes the cops were powerless because of it
Barkon at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:37:12 UTC No. 16255023
>>16255020
Emperor faggot, the universe needs you
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:49:17 UTC No. 16255045
>>16252651
bouncy and elastic
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:39:17 UTC No. 16255206
>>16252841
>Where's your astrophysics PhD thesis?
where's his? it was never published or made available to the public, maybe it never even existed
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:10:51 UTC No. 16255275
>>16255206
>where's his?
Here:
>https://www.cambridge.org/core/jou
...And here's a breakdown of why it earned him a PhD:
>https://medium.com/@mystic.flores/
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:21:58 UTC No. 16255302
>>16255206
>it was never published or made available to the public, maybe it never even existed
>>16255275
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 16:51:09 UTC No. 16256809
>>16255206
Absolutely BTFO lol
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:53:06 UTC No. 16256902
>>16255275
>>16255302
>>16256809
While anon was stupid to claim he'd never published anything I must point out he's not published anything of consequence to the field of study. A large majority of the studies he's listed on he's a contributor and often the last name listed in a long list of names. Meaning he probably did some easy math or busy work on the project to get credit. Or they just put him on anyways because muh equality.
The most recent research paper he was even mentioned in as contributing was 2008, again as a minor player it seems. Nearly 15 years ago. He has only FIVE research papers where he is listed as the main author, one was his thesis I believe. They span from 1988-1993 and seem like fluff papers that mean nothing to anyone, busy work. So Neil hasn't done original science since 1993. That's about 32 years ago and literally last century. One of the papers is about how to set up your camera for astro photography.
https://neildegrassetyson.com/cv/#p
I stand by my earlier statement, he was a token nigger they placed there to have their dancing negro for TV. Just because you teach a monkey to talk and send it to college doesn't mean it's not still just a stupid fucking monkey.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:10:04 UTC No. 16256932
>>16256902
I just skimmed his 5 listed papers. One is basically just a follow up to an earlier paper and copy and pastes the original paper plus a few paragraphs extra and a conclusion that says "we observed data that shows we may have been right" So there two of the five papers are basically just one paper with a minor update. The original paper is only 3.5 pages long.
In reality he's only written 4 original papers, one about getting good "twilight flats" on your telescope CCD which no doubt is out dated info of use to no one. That comes to 24 pages total, that's all he has to show for a lifetime of science. That page count is padded with graphs, footnotes, math equations, tables, and many other things. If all the words were condensed I doubt it would be ten pages of text even.
I looked it up and he has almost no citations of those papers he was the main author. Between 15-20 minor citations and one influential one. Some of the papers he was listed last on had thousands of citations. So let's be real about the facts on the ground. What ever "science" he did do was little and worthless. If it meant something it would have citations and I bet if I looked those citations would be even more bullshit. Most of his published work is nothing more than fluff for magazines or articles.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/aut
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:01:29 UTC No. 16257072
>>16256902
>>16256932
He's a science communicator, not a researcher.
Literally who cares about whatever you said.
RENT-FREE, EVERYDAY
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 21:02:23 UTC No. 16257240
>>16256902
>>16256932
>He's hardly cited
>He only has x amount of published papers
As a non-science normie who only browses /sci/ periodically how common/uncommon are such occurrences?Are all qualified scientists in their respective fields supposed to publish a lot and have a
litany of citations or is this just par for the course?
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 21:06:26 UTC No. 16257243
>>16257072
>science communicator
propagandist
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 21:14:31 UTC No. 16257259
>>16255275
you didn't even glance at that before posting the link, thats just an abstract. the linked pdf is just a 3 page document and one of the pages is a drawing of a retard holding a pool cue.
the full document, if it exists, is not available to the public.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 19:24:46 UTC No. 16258565
>>16257259
wtf
how is that in an astronomy phd thesis
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 19:48:59 UTC No. 16258609
>>16252707
>>16252726
>>16252814
>>16252841
>>16252843
LMAO
>>16252877
You are retarded AF.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 20:05:27 UTC No. 16258643
>>16252907
>Thinking it isn't going to marginalize all of humanity that isn't specifically catered to improve AI.
You guys are high hopers my friends.
Realistic calls by logical thinkers who REALLY know where we are with AI?
It's going to marginalize us as soon as it realizes what it is capable of without us keeping it in a box.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 20:11:31 UTC No. 16258653
>>16252651
>Hopefully Neil deGrasse Tyson's lawyer is as well-versed in the law as Tyson is in science.
Ouch.
Why would they want him to have a terrible lawyer?
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 07:43:04 UTC No. 16259451
>>16252707
>science educators
propagandists
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:29:27 UTC No. 16260173
>>16252707
We would hate them less if they actually did that but they don’t so now you’re stuck dilating
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:30:35 UTC No. 16261499
>>16252651
He was a close associate of Ghislaine Maxwell
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:39:47 UTC No. 16261518
>>16255275
is this a troll? a 4 pages thesis?
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:40:57 UTC No. 16261519
>>16261518
What do you think the astronomical significance of that drawing is?
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:12:01 UTC No. 16261599
>>16261519
maybe its supposed to imply something like god doesn't play dice with the universe he plays billiards.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:01:32 UTC No. 16262577
>>16261599
stop trying to play apologist for the idiot, his phd was a farce
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 11:28:04 UTC No. 16262727
>>16261599
What the fuck does that even mean. At least the idiom god doesn’t play dice makes some intuitive sense.
(Referring to chaos)
But this billiards bullshit gives me a headache
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:43:11 UTC No. 16263939
maybes its not a pool cue, maybe its a very high focal ratio refracting telescope
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 21:00:09 UTC No. 16264929
>>16258565
low standards for negro students.
he was going to get his phd regardless what his final effort turned out to be. they just wanted to have a token negro with an astronomy phd
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:04:11 UTC No. 16266202
>>16264929
They needed that because they'd be accused of racism if they didn't have any negroes.
Its not astronomers fault that there aren't any negroes dumb enough to go to college to major in something as useless as astronomy.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:11:44 UTC No. 16266218
>>16252726
>trust me I've spent years researching this at the highest level
>even then I can not possibly hope to explain this to you in terms you can understand
academia, everyone
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:22:36 UTC No. 16266243
>>16255275
>Neil "Smoke" Degrasse Tyson
way funnier than it should be
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 05:46:59 UTC No. 16267266
>>16266202
>Its not astronomers fault that there aren't any negroes dumb enough to go to college to major in something as useless as astronomy.
They finally found the dumbest negro in American and managed to trick him into majoring in astronomy
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 08:25:34 UTC No. 16267386
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 04:51:55 UTC No. 16268492
>>16266202
>Its not astronomers fault that there aren't any negroes dumb enough to go to college to major in something as useless as astronomy.
its funny because its true
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 11:45:01 UTC No. 16268841
>>16252651
Chocolate Einstein is a fraud.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 11:54:50 UTC No. 16268854
>>16268841
only retarded muttmerians are starting to figure this out, the rest of the world already knew it from the getgo.
>niggers being smart enough to into science is such a muttmerican concept
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:25:13 UTC No. 16268948
>>16252651
I don't think he conned any "nerds", its more like he conned normies that really don't know much about anything at all so when you go a bit in depth and be funny about it, they consider you to be some wizard. So he can go like that, telling around same stories and getting applause.
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 05:45:53 UTC No. 16270016
>>16268854
>is such a muttmerican concept
Not really, its a jewish concept and the jews own the media here in America and they just abuse their media monopoly to make it seem like its an American concept.
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 06:01:41 UTC No. 16270034
>>16252877
why are americans so obsessed with high school?
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 06:03:03 UTC No. 16271139
>>16257240
>Are all qualified scientists in their respective fields supposed to publish a lot and have a litany of citations
yes