🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 23:55:43 UTC No. 16253915
wtf? how does the Moon pull the sea on the opposite side of the Earth?
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:14:18 UTC No. 16253960
It doesnt. Fake science. It cant push water away from it. Gravitation is a purely attractice force when looked at in the newtonian framework
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:25:48 UTC No. 16253985
>>16253960
>Fake science.
I got that from the NASA website.
https://science.nasa.gov/moon/tides
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:26:59 UTC No. 16253987
>>16253985
Use your brain. Gravity can't push things away.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:31:44 UTC No. 16253999
>>16253987
I know that, why does NASA's website say otherwise?
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:34:00 UTC No. 16254000
>>16253999
NASA also said they put men on the moon but they literally can't do it even with better tech. I don't remember Newton nor Einstein, the two fathers of gravity, having anything at all to do with NASA.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:44:20 UTC No. 16254012
>>16253915
The moon pulls on the earth as well as the water. It pulls on the near side water harder than it pulls on the earth (because it's closer), so the water bulges towards the moon there. But it pulls on the earth harder than it pulls on the far side water (because the earth is closer) so the water bulges away from the moon.
In other words, it's not that the water bulges away from the moon; it's that the earth part of the earth-water system bulges towards the moon.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 02:16:17 UTC No. 16254111
>>16253915
It's just a forced harmonic oscillator.
The natural period for free oscillation of tidal waves is longer than the period of the rotation of the moon around the earth, so the response is 180 degrees out of phase.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 02:27:50 UTC No. 16254129
>>16253915
Centrifugal force maybe? The Earth-moon barycenter is close to Earth's surface.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 03:35:16 UTC No. 16254178
>>16254000
Einstein was a grifter and a fraud, and Newton lived too early to have anything but a naive understanding of gravity.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 04:11:34 UTC No. 16254214
>>16254000
>even with better tech.
But worse workers.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 04:16:04 UTC No. 16254218
>>16253915
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwC
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 05:02:52 UTC No. 16254260
>>16253915
I think that will answer your question
https://earthscience.stackexchange.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 05:24:22 UTC No. 16254279
>>16254260
So basically >>16253960 was right.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 05:27:08 UTC No. 16254281
>>16254279
No. Neither basically, nor complexly.
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:31:11 UTC No. 16254319
>>16253960
>>16253987
>>16254178
> retards can't do the math
LMAO
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:33:28 UTC No. 16254322
>>16253960
>>16253987
>>16254178
> too retarded to do the math
LMAO
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:34:03 UTC No. 16254542
Why do schools teach wrong in formation on tides?
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:34:35 UTC No. 16254544
>>16254260
>stackexchange
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:39:21 UTC No. 16254546
>>16253985
Nasa is the embodiment of fake science
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:53:34 UTC No. 16254555
>>16254218
I can't get past the basic assumption that something further away from a gravitational source must be attracted less. Does B get attracted less than the Earth's center because the center is making gravity exhaust itself? Suppose the Earth was a hollow sphere: would there be less of a difference between gravitational force at point A and point B?
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 11:01:57 UTC No. 16254562
>>16253915
>how does the Moon pull the sea on the opposite side of the Earth?
really good question. Here wew go:
The moon exerts a gravitational pull on the earth. The water on the side of the earth closest to the moon experiences this pull most strongly, resulting in a bulge of water forming a high tide. However, the earth as a whole is also pulled toward the moon. This causes the earth to shift slightly towards the moon, creating a centrifugal effect on the water on the opposite side.
On the side of the earth away from the moon, the gravitational pull of the moon is weaker. The water on this side tries to stay in place due to inertia (the tendency of a mass to resist changes in its state of motion). Since the earth is being pulled slightly more toward the moon than this water, it creates a relative outward bulge, forming another high tide.
Was that clear enough?
Additionally, the Sun also produces it's own two tidal peaks on the oceans, so in reality, there are four tidal peaks and troughs interacting each day, and their interaction produces a predictable but always shifting pattern. Picture related as an example.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:01:23 UTC No. 16255596
>>16254562
Good explanation.Thanks.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:50:01 UTC No. 16255735
>>16254555
>I can't get past the basic assumption that something further away from a gravitational source must be attracted less
...You can't understand that the strength of gravity falls off with distance?
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 06:03:04 UTC No. 16256160
>>16255596
no problem, anytime
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:29:20 UTC No. 16256731
>>16253999
>When the Moon’s gravity pulls at Earth, the water doesn’t float outward, it just gets pushed and squeezed around on the globe, directed by both gravitational pull and other forces, until it ultimately ends up bulging out on the side closest to the Moon and the side farthest away.
>and other forces
What other forces? Thanks a lot, NASA.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:05:38 UTC No. 16256822
>>16254555
inverse square law
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:22:11 UTC No. 16256962
>>16254012
Now draw the vectors and see what they have vomit in your brain.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:34:13 UTC No. 16256989
>>16254111
Since when could you upload PDFs to 4chan?
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:47:47 UTC No. 16258053
>>16253960
>>16253915
Gravity, a force ubiquitously governing the macroscopic universe, remains an enigma despite the paradigmatic frameworks of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. Recent theoretical advances in Smectical Doggometry (SD), a burgeoning discipline grounded in fractal geometry and oscillatory dynamics, have enabled unparalleled rigor in modeling complex phenomena. Meanwhile, Quantum Entanglement (QE), a cornerstone of non-locality, has been widely acknowledged as a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics. This study pioneers the notion that SD, interfaced with QE, holds the key to explicating the push-pull principle of gravity.
The synthesis of SD and GE produced a startling correspondence. Sub-shifting equidistant shift spectra, derived from gravitational oscillons, exhibited quadratic resonance frequencies concordant with experimentally validated gravitational wave patterns. Furthermore, the push-pull principle of gravity emerged as an inherent consequence of the intertwined DOGG and entangled eigenstates. Specifically, our results demonstrated that:
Smectical Doggometry's
equidistant shift spectra recapitulate the fundamental harmonics governing gravitational interactions.
2. Sub-shifting equidistant shift spectra
disclose intricate symmetries, consonant with gravitational wave patterns, underscoring the quadratic Nature of gravitational interactions.
3. Gravitational Entanglement
bridges the SD-QE interface, furnishing empirical evidence for the push-pull principle.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:58:27 UTC No. 16258063
>>16253985
Gross oversimplification, to the point of being a lie. Reality is very different
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:13:53 UTC No. 16258084
>>16253987
The math says it does. Think of it as creating a pressure hole on the opposite side toward which the other water moves
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:22:49 UTC No. 16258093
>>16254562
>earth to shift slightly towards the moon, creating a centrifugal effect on the water on the opposite side.
Word salad. That's not what centrifugal means
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 15:00:17 UTC No. 16258195
>>16254562
Nobody can explain how and why tides exist.
Tides are not even uniform like in the OP.
There are multiple "tides nodes" and "amphidromic points".
So points without any change of water level and points with strong changes.
>see picrel
There are like in the the ocean places with 0 changes in tides while the same body of water exhibits a tidal change just 300km distant.
It seems to related to moonphases. But its not gavitational.
Actually nobody know its simply speculated.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:55:53 UTC No. 16258345
>>16253999
if you haven't noticed NASA says a lot of dumb shit because they refuse to acknowledge real science. If you aren't learning plasma physics, you don't understand physics. It's that simple
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:58:51 UTC No. 16258348
>>16254322
>believes all the theoretical garbage forced own his throat by mainstream physics
lol
lmao
Tell me you're an NPC without telling me
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 17:51:49 UTC No. 16258413
https://youtu.be/pwChk4S99i4?si=2PN
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 19:09:35 UTC No. 16258533
>>16258195
so the earth is flat isn't it? come on now admit it.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 19:18:41 UTC No. 16258556
>>16253915
Hydrogravitative equilibrium as it pulls the close side. The close side has a gravitational pull on the far side, the hydrostatic pressure of the water acting on itself forces it into a shape that the solid of Earth's rocky core can't stretch to in the same elastic timing.
It truly does make sense, we are essentially squeezing a heterogenous system, but the system of the water is homogeneous, yet still affected, so it has the same effect across that substrate.
The push-pull on the Earth's rocky and solid core levels is responsible for geothermal activity of some level.
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 08:10:38 UTC No. 16259473
>>16258533
> Moons gravity does not cause tides
>therefore erth must be flat
Are you retarded?
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 11:45:43 UTC No. 16259605
>>16258195
Fascinating, thanks.
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 11:59:08 UTC No. 16259623
>>16258195
>speculated
On a first glance it looks likes a swinging system with interferences. Highs everywhere the sea narrowed by land, Lows in the open, in-between interferences. Moon triggers and syncs that, so it must be on both sides
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 12:03:26 UTC No. 16259632
>>16254218
PBS? deep-state propaganda.
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 12:08:42 UTC No. 16259637
>>16258053
Well that seems pretty clear, I concur.