🗑️ 🧵 Is it possible to pozz the hard sciences?
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:06:43 UTC No. 16254846
And how could you know it was unless you scrapped everything and started again from scratch with no presumptions?
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:56:24 UTC No. 16254914
>>16254846
>Is it possible to pozz the hard sciences?
Haven't you heard? Everything done by white people is racist
>Physicists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and SUNY Stony Brook recently concluded that two black holes maintained their total surface area after merging. While this research was a welcome confirmation of the theory of general relativity, it failed to address a crucial matter: What were its racial implications?
>That’s a lacuna that an astronomy course at Cornell University aims to prevent. “Black Holes: Race and the Cosmos” poses the question, “Is there a connection between the cosmos and the idea of racial blackness?”
>Anyone familiar with academia’s racial monomania knows the answer: Of course, there is. Though “conventional wisdom,” according to the course description, holds that the “‘black’ in black holes has nothing to do with race,” astronomy professor Nicholas Battaglia and comparative-literature professor Parisa Vaziri know better.
>Battaglia and Vaziri draw on theorists such as Emory University English professor Michelle Wright, whose book, “The Physics of Blackness,” invokes “Newton’s laws of motion and gravity” and “theoretical particle physics” to “subvert racist assumptions about blackness.” The course also studies music by Sun Ra and Outkast to “conjure blackness through cosmological themes.”
https://nypost.com/2021/06/23/are-c
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:59:30 UTC No. 16254917
>>16254846
Even chemistry is pozzed with wokeism nowadays. My professor seriously taught us about "trans" and "cis" molecules.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:21:28 UTC No. 16254935
>>16254917
my understanding is that literally every academic position now requires you to sign some kind of quasi religious dei pledge just to get hired
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:44:49 UTC No. 16254964
>>16254846
>>16254914
>>16254917
If the field is dominated by women it will become pozzed if given enough time. Women =pozzed everything
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:43:14 UTC No. 16255215
>>16254914
>YEAH BLACK HOLES HELLA RACIST, THEY JUST SUCK A BROTHA UP LIKE A WATERMELON SLURPEE ON A HOT SUMMER BLOCK AT THE PROJECTS
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:00:43 UTC No. 16255249
>>16254846
>Is it possible to pozz the hard sciences?
yes, political pressure is real
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clima
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:25:32 UTC No. 16255427
>>16255208
fat bitch
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 02:14:37 UTC No. 16255851
>>16255208
That's exactly what you do when you pose for a public photo.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 03:24:22 UTC No. 16255963
>>16255926
I really liked him when I was a kid.
It's sad to see what's become of him.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 03:47:33 UTC No. 16255996
Even within the hard sciences there are certain politically sensitive research topics, though not as many as social sciences. And of course politics will dictate certain research directions even if the topic isn't particularly sensitive, for example the drive to improve photovoltaics. But as far as the content and research goes, I don't think it's a huge issue.
Even so, if you read editorials and non-research content in media aimed specifically at researchers (journals or professional magazines), you'll very quickly see that the hard sciences are absolutely not exempt from the insanity. Science departments are very much run by old white men, so of course there's a push to make this not so. And of course it's as heavy-handed and hypocritical as you would expect.
Basically, though the hard science research itself can avoid politics, underlying this research is academia which is all about politics, and at the end of the day the people in the field are the current manifestation of the field.
I think it's all kind of dumb but I don't think it's all ruined or anything.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 04:40:51 UTC No. 16256042
>>16254917
>"trans" and "cis" molecules
That made me laugh
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 06:58:46 UTC No. 16256236
>>16255926
are those actual quotes ore are you just eating up some bullshit meme?
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:16:41 UTC No. 16256949
>>16255963
he was a massive pedophile back then too
🗑️ Αnonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:20:05 UTC No. 16256959
>>16256236
>are those actual quotes ore are you just eating up some bullshit meme?
This was plastered all over 4chan seven years ago, back when you were in middle school.
Dr Stone at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:24:36 UTC No. 16256967
>>16254846
Me on the left
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:55:24 UTC No. 16257057
>>16256967
Are you hot? I'm hot
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:58:41 UTC No. 16257065
>>16256236
The definition of the word "gender" has changed since, so it's the distinction wasn't made back then as it is today.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:00:47 UTC No. 16257695
>>16255926
Reminder that substituting science for The Bible only means that you have no meaningful or consistent beliefs and no character or personality and that what you think can be changed whenever anyone with enough money and influence decides to alter whatever "the science" is.
>we have always been at war with eastasia
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:10:25 UTC No. 16257704
>>16254846
>>16254914
YWNBAP
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 00:15:19 UTC No. 16258999
>>16257695
thats by design
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:16:13 UTC No. 16260038
>>16257065
no it hasn't. just because homosexuals says it has doesn't make it so. nothing homosexuals say is ever true, homosexuality is a mental illness
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 04:35:38 UTC No. 16260664
>>16255208
getting her tits cut off only made her already enormous nose look proportionally larger.
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 21:59:58 UTC No. 16262013
>>16254846
by comparing past science output and past scientists to present ones
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 21:05:27 UTC No. 16263290
clearly
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 17:08:41 UTC No. 16264531
>>16254964
thats only because the media influences women so strongly
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 05:33:35 UTC No. 16265511
>>16256949
the jimmy savile of the science world
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:37:08 UTC No. 16266674
>>16265511
theres a lot of those
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:48:36 UTC No. 16266704
>>16266674
LMAO
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 17:46:52 UTC No. 16267845
>>16266704
Bezos' wife divorced him for the same reason, Bezos was closely associated with Ghislaine Maxwell
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 06:55:28 UTC No. 16268613
>>16254846
You can't pozz the abstract, but defo you can pozz the people figuring it.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:22:28 UTC No. 16268941
>>16256042
Actual /sci/entist detected in a board full of /pol/yps.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:38:44 UTC No. 16268959
>>16254917
>>16254935
>>16254964
>first few replies are giving serious replies
this board is so over
i liked the joke, anon
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 05:47:50 UTC No. 16270019
>>16268941
>/pol/ is out to get me!!!
>its a big conspiracy!!!
https://www.healthcentral.com/condi
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 05:14:26 UTC No. 16271096
>>16255249
>wikipedia
fake af
referencing wikipedia is pretty admitting that you're completely uninformed on the topic you're trying to pose as an expert in