🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:27:18 UTC No. 16255314
Dark """"""matter"""""" was blown the fuck out yet again
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:32:15 UTC No. 16255326
>>16255314
I recognize her from German Goo Girls.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:34:32 UTC No. 16255330
what are those supposed to be? tie fighters?
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:18:05 UTC No. 16255415
MONDsisters, we're back in business!
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:20:42 UTC No. 16255423
>>16255314
Sabine is the Hawk Tuah of physics.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:25:10 UTC No. 16255425
>>16255314
oh oh darkies...
also, yes, she's flat af!
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:41:17 UTC No. 16255460
The analysis conflicts with other papers, which do find a decline at large radii. But of course Sabine just takes the claims of these pro-MOND researchers at face value.
They also make the weak assumption that their galaxies are totally isolated, which won't be true. Naturally they do not consult DM simulations to see how the result really looks according to dark matter models instead of just assuming perfect isolation.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:40:55 UTC No. 16255578
>>16255571
She's a RILF
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:41:56 UTC No. 16255580
>>16255578
Gross. But she would probably fuck you under the right circumstances.
Barkon at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:41:59 UTC No. 16255581
>>16255423
You forgot Carlo.
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:42:30 UTC No. 16255583
>>16255423
God, I'm such a Gunther.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:24:45 UTC No. 16255693
sabine is the kind of woman that would have pushed the big red button labeled "gas" at the chambers with a smile on her face between the years of 1939-1945
something about this woman scares me but also gets me a little bricked up
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:32:22 UTC No. 16255703
>>16255314
I'd give all the Dark Matter in the Universe for one whiff of those Kraut clod hoppers.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 01:49:44 UTC No. 16255832
>>16255314
I was very impressed with her recent agi video.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 02:35:28 UTC No. 16255882
>>16255571
>>16255460
Is this the first time she's been outright wrong about a physics topic?
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 06:10:15 UTC No. 16256174
>>16255882
>outright wrong about a physics topic?
no problem there if she admits her errors and mistakes
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:54:59 UTC No. 16256558
>>16255882
>>16255460
Coping dark matteroids
>le simulations!!!
Yeah the simulations that have no predictive power
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:53:48 UTC No. 16256625
>>16256558
Well if you don't use a simulation you're just using an equation, which only works if the galaxy is the only object in the universe and exactly matches the extrapolation.
>Yeah the simulations that have no predictive power
The equation they are assuming for the DM profile comes from simulations, the NFW profile. And simulations have lots of predictive power, they are able to match the galaxy lensing data for example.
What's funny is the paper they copied this lensing idea from (who did it much better) did look at simulations and it does change the outer profile. Something completely ignored here.
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/f
>>16255882
She also wrote an article about DM years ago which was total horseshit. Every citation misquoted and misrepresented. People pointed out in the comments, she said she was being intentionally misleading to make a point. The problem is that many people reading her blog do not check and take it literally.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 14:54:30 UTC No. 16256697
>>16255415
>we can ignore the last 30 complete debunkings of mond this year because the latest thing doesn't make it look that bad!
uh, no, sorry mondsisters, we are not back
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 14:55:29 UTC No. 16256698
>>16255832
It was short-sighted and echoed all the pop-science tropes it claimed to be against
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:19:41 UTC No. 16256724
>>16255693
>bricked up
Constipated? She's German so she'd be into that.