Barkon at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:09:47 UTC No. 16255393

It can, it's just that universes have interested parties who like to exploit the original data.

How stupid are you? This is basic stuff..

Only joke, you have to have 300 IQ to understand things like this.

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:12:12 UTC No. 16255402

>>16255355
Anon quantum computing will never exist. It’s a scam.

Cope and Seeth

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:30:17 UTC No. 16255700

>>16255355
In high school AP physics class one of my labs was to set up a ramp for a marble on the lab table and place a coffee can at least 6 feet away on the floor. I would have to do the math by hand to construct the ramp in such a manner the marble would roll down the contraption and shoot off the lab table and land in the coffee can perfectly. We all got one chance, the teacher had the marble in his pocket. When your contraption was complete you called the teacher over and he dropped the marble himself and we all waited to see if it landed in the coffee can. It was a pass or fail, one shot. My lab group swished the marble in the can, got an A.

You don't need a quantum computer to plot the path of a ball. It's simple math based on Newtonian mechanics. I literally did it at 16 with paper and a TI-83. Also not to put a too fine a point on it but comparing my HS lab experiment to plotting all the mater in all the universe(known & unknown) through out all space & time is the most retarded thing I've read all week. Congrats.

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:31:18 UTC No. 16255702

>>16255402
>Anon quantum computing will never exist. It’s a scam.
>Cope and Seeth
This too

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:37:17 UTC No. 16255716

causality is a debunked myth

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 10:42:20 UTC No. 16256406

>>16255402
I want QC to work but the actual QC projects all look and act like Theranos.

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:49:36 UTC No. 16256478

>>16255355
How does a quantum computer fit into computing theory? What type of computer are they?

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:22:56 UTC No. 16256514

>>16255355
>why could it not calculate what would happen from the big bang, to the end of the universe. ?
because that quantum computer is the entire universe. The only way to simulate everything, down to the very last fundamental particle and all the paths and all he interactions they took and will ever take, is the universe itself.

Anything else is but an approximation, data must be discarded, and so they're called simulations.

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:34:53 UTC No. 16256536

>>16256478
>What type of computer are they?
Random number generators.

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:39:46 UTC No. 16256542

>>16255355
>why could it not calculate what would happen from the big bang, to the end of the universe. ?
Why cant I model the behavior of 10^80 atom with just few thousands or millions atoms?
LOL

Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:11:26 UTC No. 16257705

>>16255355
Not really

Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 04:42:57 UTC No. 16259310

You can reliably store a mathematical maximum of 2 bits in 1 qubit and the universe contains approximately 1E80 total particles. Even if every particle in the universe were used as part of the quantum computer, that would only be able to store about 2E80 bits of data. Even with a theoretical decillion to one lossless data compression algorithm, the position vectors alone would require more data than could be stored.

Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 04:56:31 UTC No. 16259314

If quantum bollocks were to stop on a dime it’s still quantum bollocks

Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 06:09:47 UTC No. 16259356

>>16255355
Because simulating an entire universe accurately and without using significant approximations would take more information than is contained within the entire observable universe.

Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 07:47:32 UTC No. 16259456

>>16255355
>>16255393
>>16255402
First learn the capabilities and limitations of quantum computers, you dumbasses.
>>16255716
Fucking retard.

Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 09:35:39 UTC No. 16259520

>>16255355
>if a quantum computer could calculate exactly where a ball will go
Quantum computing can solve the ligma problem?

Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 09:36:47 UTC No. 16259521

>>16259456
>Fucking retard.
He's right though, you reddit pseud.

Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 18:13:49 UTC No. 16260096

>>16259456
>Fucking retard.
I guess you're the only person on earth who has got evidence for the causality idea. Go ahead and present it to the world and claim your nobel (while somehow explaining away the myriad of counterproofs).
Nigga it's the most fucking retarded idea ever made. There'd be absolutely no point for anything in the universe to exist if it was a thing.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 16:50:53 UTC No. 16261387

>>16256478
A quantum computer can be simulated by a Turing machine, so every problem that can be solved by a quantum computer can be solved by a regular computer. Quantum computers can be modeled by a 'Quantum Turing machine.'

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:02:44 UTC No. 16261576

>>16261387
Is there some O changes for different kinds of problems depending on the machine type?

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 20:11:54 UTC No. 16261859

>>16261576
It heavily depends on the algorithm. In the best possible scenario a quantum computer can run in O(n) time what requires O(2^n) time in a classical computer. However current practical quantum algorithms run in O(n) what requires O(n*n) in classical computers.