🗑️ 🧵 Women
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 07:58:24 UTC No. 16256287
Are women innately bad at math? Men seem to have better visuospatial reasoning than women, yet both men and women are technically capable of getting good at math. Is it a matter of effort, or ability?
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:19:57 UTC No. 16256301
>>16256287
This will lead us down yet another rabbit-hole of nature vs. nurture...
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 09:53:16 UTC No. 16256357
>>16256287
Average IQs, average cognitive profiles, etc., don't really matter in a field that attracts above-average performers.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 10:18:34 UTC No. 16256377
>>16256287
Women are too busy seeking social approval to develop logic and reasoning skills that are disagreeable and socially isolating. Such a mode of being can never be the front of science.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:29:56 UTC No. 16256457
>>16256287
Women will destroy science in the future
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:03:47 UTC No. 16256491
If I heat bread it becomes toast.
So everything that's toasted is bread.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:39:25 UTC No. 16256541
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:58:29 UTC No. 16256565
by counterexample
sqrt(2) is irrational
sqrt(sqrt(2)) is irrational (plaetr)
sqrt(sqrt(2))^2 = sqrt(2)
So not everything you square becomes rational
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:08:10 UTC No. 16256578
>>16256541
>and I posted this again!!!!!1 Cause I dont have arguments but will defend all female retardation
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:14:39 UTC No. 16256584
>>16256457
>in the future
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:40:50 UTC No. 16256606
>>16256287
I think that on a base level, most women are better than most men at math. This may be controversial and you'll probably try to come up with "counterexamples" that will just prove my point
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:46:15 UTC No. 16256615
>>16256578
still right, by your comment
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 16:00:46 UTC No. 16256768
>>16256615
I want to see evidence instead of female way of communication that involves gaslighting, what you practice now
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 16:16:01 UTC No. 16256785
Let's pretend, just for a moment, that math was a skill. That is to say, a top performer requires genetic predisposition to the activity, however, even one genetically opposed to the activity can improve to a certain level. Why would women bother developing this skill? It is not the easiest path available, and they were not told to do so regardless, so they do not.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 16:20:04 UTC No. 16256790
>>16256287
Yes.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 16:22:25 UTC No. 16256793
>>16256287
Why are men so bad at critical thinking? They fall for the most retarded and obviously made up poltard propaganda
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 16:59:05 UTC No. 16256815
>>16256793
Go to your gender studies class smart tranny
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:26:35 UTC No. 16256972
>>16256287
Obviously throughout history there have been women who were genuinely into math and good at it. They have their spergs too, they're just not as common.
I know a chick who used to work in that general field and got to know her in the first place because we got talking and found out we're both into that shit in a way normies just couldn't give two craps about.
Since historically that's not an area most normies would be interested in for prestige, for which there's plenty of competition at the top, where you have to literally 'prove' shit, and where there's no physical disadvantage, I doubt anyone ever really had a problem with women who were drawn to the subject and capable - least of all other mathematicians/academics. Especially considering some of the relevant fields for mathematics, and if a woman wanted to study math, teach herself, and work on advanced problems, how could you realistically stop her anyway?
Especially in an era where you have girls taught math in school, if that's her bag, she's going to fucking know about it pretty quick and have access to everything she needs to demonstrate her aptitude, generate a record of it, get noticed, and go all the way with it.
Outside of that, is some stock market fag going to give a shit if his number-cruncher is a skirt if she's making him money? Is anyone going to get upset if some chick just shows up and dumps a proof for the Riemann Hypothesis on their desk?
It's like this scene never struck me as some kind of feministy shit or out of place in any way:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahH
Seems like an ideal field for a housewife actually.
The sad thing in the CURRENT YEAR is, you couldn't just google the top female mathematicians throughout history without getting some sickeningly politicised list that is desperately grasping for nobody bitches who once added two and two together, then overblowing their actual work and achievements in a manner you can't take at face value.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:27:53 UTC No. 16256975
>>16256972
(cont ... )
... Nor could you just believe any woman with some degree or even employment position is actually qualified.
Though my standard response to the 'muh Pay Gap' bullshit is to tell them women do get paid less but it's because they suck at math - they can't even take an average correctly. I'm half-joking, but if you want 'evidence' women are worse at math on average I'd say that qualifies considering the number of bitches who believe it and repeat it.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 20:15:56 UTC No. 16257162
>>16256768
I don't think it's gaslighting, it's just a bunch of a priori facts.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 21:07:24 UTC No. 16257245
>>16256287
I'm going to lay down 2 truths on you:
1: Most math is totally unimportant and does nothing good for society. All the useful math is basic arithmetic
2: Women had their time and it's over now. They are both extraneous and a threat to the continuation of the species.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 21:13:06 UTC No. 16257255
>>16256377
Now you know why scientism is a thing. Whores', kikes' and sois' only weapon is social manipulation. Hence the modern age.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 23:13:34 UTC No. 16257420
>>16257245
>math is useless
>enjoy using his computer, the internet, city infraestructrue etc.
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 23:27:17 UTC No. 16257435
>>16257420
Oh computers use something other than basic arithmetic do they?
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:24:00 UTC No. 16257483
>>16257435
Yes. They do.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 02:52:41 UTC No. 16257562
>>16257162
You should Google fact
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 02:54:08 UTC No. 16257565
>>16257162
>Says made up thing
>Calls it a fact
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 03:08:20 UTC No. 16257581
>>16257483
No. Like with everything, the field has simply been overcomplicated by overeducated retards (though less overeducated by the day, if you know what I mean (dot, not feather)).
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:40:07 UTC No. 16257734
>>16257565
I know it's difficult to understand, not everyone gets to be smart.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 07:05:16 UTC No. 16257816
>>16256768
>I want to see evidence
talk to women, loser.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:19:06 UTC No. 16257853
>>16257816
>Women dominate education system
>Girls get better at education system.
Imagine my shock
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:22:44 UTC No. 16257857
>>16257853
They're actually actively giving boys worse grades now also.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:26:47 UTC No. 16257861
>>16257857
Really? I thought it's because education system is female orientated, and that's the reason, but do they really giving boys worse grades? Any evidence?
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:32:53 UTC No. 16257863
>>16257816
You go far and far from the first question. Roastie
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:41:22 UTC No. 16257866
>>16257861
It's been exposed several times now. It's become an institutional problem.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ful
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:51:01 UTC No. 16257870
>>16256541
What does this comic try to convey, scientifically speaking? Doubt is a mask for anger, anger is a mask for sadness, and sadness is a mask for loneliness?
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:52:24 UTC No. 16257873
>>16257734
Female gaslighting session number 3568
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:52:32 UTC No. 16257874
>>16257816
Women prefer men who share their values, but men are not allowed to prefer women who share their values?
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:56:45 UTC No. 16257876
>>16257874
Yes, men should be slaves for women and give them all money through taxation and gifts. If you question it we will get your money out
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:00:25 UTC No. 16257877
>>16257870
It tries to convince anons that their questions and disaproval of current mainstream opinion is consequence of loneliness with inheritly no evidence of it.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:20:38 UTC No. 16257886
>>16257870
men who show emotions are stunted manchildren
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:39:38 UTC No. 16257893
>>16257870
Men who disaprove women in anything are lonely losers
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:51:59 UTC No. 16257896
>>16256287
I think a world (literally our current world) where only men are in power is a shitty world. I think a world where only women are in power, or at least a majority of them, can only be a better one.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:59:34 UTC No. 16257903
>>16257896
Women have never been more in control of everything at any point in human history. That's exactly why everything is fucking imploding.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:15:19 UTC No. 16257915
>>16257903
>Women have never been more in control of everything at any point in human history.
That's right, brother. They went from 0% to 1%. It's true that going from nothing to something, even something tiny, is technically a huge step forward. Is it significant? No. The world is the way it is (i.e. shitty, let's be honest) because men are in power.
Women don't fight wars. It's not women who sell you shit. It's not women who make you work 8 hours a day for 50 years before dying with your body and mind completely ruined. They're not women who make you hate your neighbor because his hair color is different from yours.
Of course, if you look hard enough, you'll find a woman ceo who's been running a shitty company for 3 years after 50 years of male management, and who's selling us crap. Or you'll find me a female politician with a bit of power who advocates crap. But as they say, for every rule, there are exceptions. The rule is the man. The exceptions are women.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:26:22 UTC No. 16257921
>>16257915
Did you forget that shillary was literally a bloodthirsty sec of state? Also ALL modern wars serve kikes - a literally matriarchal tribe. And women are in control of EVERY corporation at this point. That's why they're all run for shit now. They're in charge of ALL media, ALL hiring at every job in America, they're enforcing social bullshit that NOBODY wants and is highly unpopular. This is ALL women and men obeying women. All of it.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:27:59 UTC No. 16257923
>>16256565
>sqrt(sqrt(2)) is irrational
Prove it.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:58:56 UTC No. 16258349
>>16257873
No amount of cope is going to cure your inceldom.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:25:05 UTC No. 16258470
>>16258349
I'm personally a married man, but same cannot be said about you, cat roastie or effeminated faggot
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:30:40 UTC No. 16258482
>>16258470
OK incel.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:34:09 UTC No. 16258486
>>16258349
Nobody wants to fuck women anymore. Your one weapon is eroding FAST, whore.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:35:10 UTC No. 16258487
>>16258482
OK landfill. Enjoy obsolescence.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 19:13:46 UTC No. 16258546
>>16256357
\thread
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 20:41:39 UTC No. 16258697
>>16258482
Incel is not an insult you say to someone you dont like, roastie
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 08:35:54 UTC No. 16259480
>>16258487
Lo, mogged
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:49:34 UTC No. 16260081
>>16257876
Women..
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 07:41:33 UTC No. 16260827
>>16257874
>men are not allowed to prefer women who share their values?
To find which women share your values, you must first know how to talk about them.
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 07:43:04 UTC No. 16260828
>>16257863
>Roastie
Think's I'm a woman because I know how to talk to women. kek
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:55:00 UTC No. 16261094
>>16260828
You behave like a rostie therefore you are as bad as a roastie
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 16:13:22 UTC No. 16261287
>>16256287
>example
literally just square root any irrational number at all
tracey is a dumbass
vegan at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 16:16:09 UTC No. 16261296
>>16257923
Rational number: any number written as a ratio of integers
Product of any two integers: another integer
therefore, a/b*c/d=e/f will always be integer e and f (rational e/f) assuming integer a, b, c, d
Therefore, if x^2 is irrational, x is necessarily irrational
Therefore the root of any irrational is irrational
therefore sqrtsqrt2 is irrational
therefore you should kys yourself
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 16:18:48 UTC No. 16261300
>>16261296
kys now
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 16:20:55 UTC No. 16261305
>>16261300
>triggered that a vegan out-proofed you
lol
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 03:36:04 UTC No. 16262378
>>16261296
No one cares if you are a vegan
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 03:48:18 UTC No. 16262394
>>16262378
Yet (you) care enough to reply even though the post doesn't say fuckall about being vegan.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 03:48:57 UTC No. 16262396
>>16256287
Yes. Most young boys are too monkey brained to sit still in class. They end up behind behind in basic concepts as the class moves onto more difficult areas
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:24:19 UTC No. 16262907
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:40:57 UTC No. 16262920
>>16256287
Why are you so American? Did you try to stop?
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:47:32 UTC No. 16262924
The question is wrong because the answer is right.
(SQRT(2)+SQRT(8))^2=18
Let's simplify. SQRT(8) simplifies to SQRT(2*4).
SQRT(2)*SQRT(4) = 2*SQRT(2)
(1*SQRT(2) + 2*SQRT(2))^2 = 18
Which becomes (3*SQRT(2))^2 =18
(3^2)*(SQRT(2)^2) = 9*2 = 18
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 03:16:08 UTC No. 16263685
>>16260828
im sure he thinks youre a woman because you have no sense
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 03:25:44 UTC No. 16263699
>>16262907
Your point? The post you previously replied to doesn't say fuckall about being vegan.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 13:55:32 UTC No. 16264318
>>16263699
You concertate on vegan part
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 14:00:42 UTC No. 16264323
>>16257581
you are retarded
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:09:19 UTC No. 16264375
>>16262924
You literally can't read properly
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:15:09 UTC No. 16264379
>>16264318
>>16261296 doesn't say anything about being vegan in the post body
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:12:37 UTC No. 16264746
>>16256377
It's not just that. Large proficiency in logic and math is inherently inversely proportional in being able to tolerate social bullshit and other such factors that makes one "softer". This is very important for handling babies, who apparently get some mental scarring from their mom (or parent) ignoring their antics for too much and the parent not smiling at them.
Foregoing a description why that is right now, it's clear that males are more autistic, and autism is bad for child rearing. Aspergers is correlated with math and logic ability. Hence, women such at logic/math comparatively.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 06:03:38 UTC No. 16265530
>>16264746
No, women are better at everything it's just oppression that makes them worse
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:15:00 UTC No. 16266404
>>16264379
>t. Attention seeking vegan
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 03:36:14 UTC No. 16267125
>>16256357
Women don't need to be in that field
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 03:39:03 UTC No. 16267130
>>16256815
>it's da tranny
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 03:40:35 UTC No. 16267133
>>16257255
I always lol when /pol/cels talk about "low at males", "soibois" and "beta males" and them you see how they look IRL
KEEEK
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 03:41:48 UTC No. 16267139
>>16257816
>mental health game aka height face and frame
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 04:51:42 UTC No. 16267221
>>16267133
argumentum ad hominem. <=This is what you do
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 06:08:40 UTC No. 16267291
>>16267221
If you think about it, what that /pol/ shizo described is literally themselves kekekekekek
Only high T chads argue against the /pol/ schizo circlejerk on their own board
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 10:01:10 UTC No. 16267430
>>16267291
Ho back to gif
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:50:56 UTC No. 16267593
>>16257861
Well the fact that males score better than females on standardized tests of math (SAT-M, AP calculus exam): http://aweonline.org/arp_infosheet_
within the united states and outside (PISA): (pic rel)
should enlighten you to the idea that school is anti-boy in the sense that boys are more likely to do shit that pisses off the teachers (not hand in assignments be rebellious etc).
Interestingly studies showed that home schooled children both did do better than regular public/private school students and that there was virtually no sex difference: https://web.archive.org/web/2013010
Another interesting tid-bit is that the math scores of girls suddenly spiked than dipped back to normal (below boys) in the 2021 GCSE's. What caused this? The pandemic meant that the schools had to use students teacher assigned grades instead of, you know, taking a test: https://www.theguardian.com/educati
Males are more variable (more male retards and more male geniuses, more female normies) and the gap in quantitative reasoning in this regard has increased: https://www.sciencedirect.com/scien
In fact this is so well known that there is even a name for it, its the variability hypothesis:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varia
And the fact that this monster article confirms this to the level of the actual brain morphology should prove this to you: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ar
School grades are just contests to prove who can suck up to the teacher the best, that's really it, turns out girls can do that pretty darn well.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 14:47:37 UTC No. 16267650
>>16267593
>Interestingly studies showed that home schooled children both did do better than regular public/private school students and that there was virtually no sex difference
Well, we should remember that homeschooled boys most likely be schooled by other women as well. Who unintentionally school in a female orientated way
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 15:20:27 UTC No. 16267680
>>16256606
Flat vs peaked bell curved.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 17:10:23 UTC No. 16267803
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 19:17:46 UTC No. 16267954
>>16262396
No, women can't teach them
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 00:41:15 UTC No. 16268285
>>16257923
Note: sqrt(sqrt2)=4th root of 2
Lemma. for all n>3, nth root of 2 is irrational
proof: BWOC, suppose nth root of 2 is rational. Then there exist positive integers a,b coprime such that a/b=nth root of 2. This implies a^n=b^n+b^n, contradicting Fermat's last theorem. Hence, nth root of 2 is irrational for n>3.
Theorem. sqrt(sqrt(2)) is irrational.
proof: apply lemma above with n=4. Q.E.D
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 07:49:57 UTC No. 16268658
>>16256287
Roasties are roasted
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 12:35:37 UTC No. 16268886
>>16262396
I would have said the opposite was true, in that most girls don't give two shits about STEM subjects as it is, but after they hit puberty are extremely preoccupied with everything but.
Nerd males can naturally handle puberty AND math class, because being competent in something is how males ultimately get money and women, but it was my observation that most of the girls were too worried about social shit, having 'Inside Out' anxiety about how they looked socially, (and everything else under the sun), to have much mental capacity left for academic shit. It's like the worst time to try to teach them literally anything because by that point they're realising they can get males to do whatever they want anyway, are obsessed with trying to get the most competent male available, think they're hot shit and too cool for skool.
A more specific example is they wouldn't want to get 'public' ridicule for asking a 'dumb question' in class, which is necessary to really learn anything. Females are more geared to worry about that kind of shit and take it badly, so the fear of it undermines their ability to learn anything. Also as above they can use their female skillz to just leech off the nearest male who does know what he's doing so they don't have to think.
Like I gave my wife a multiple choice IQ test once. It became apparent she wasn't even 'thinking' about the questions at all, she was just watching me knowing I knew the correct answer and saying shit to gauge my reactions before committing to an answer. Literally this shit:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleve
No shock her IQ came out close to mine, (unlikely).
It's literally easier for a woman to do that kind of thing than think for herself, so it's natural, habitual.
>eg. Between asking for directions and just figuring out how a map works, the former is the easier option for them.
Males to them are like what an AI assistant is to you and makes them mentally lazy in a similar way right from the get go.
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 03:40:34 UTC No. 16269918
>>16267650
The study doesn't specifically say standardized tests that measure math. Remember there are also vocab subjects that are tested (stuff that girls do better at) which depend on if you did the SAT subject tests. It's totally possible in my eyes that boys did better in science and math related subjects in standardized tests (they typically do). But since there are more humanities and language subjects than math and science subjects, that lifted girls grades the extra 1 percentile (which is fucking nothing). Your hypothesis is also possibly true, but I feel that regardless of who the parent is, the parent will know the learning style of their own child 500x better than some random with a degree, which would boost the grades of the home schoolers the extra 37 percentile points. Schools primarily use rote memorization (remember the facts then write them down / remember the process then use the process) instead of using cognitive abilities, problem solving and working memory. Standardized like the SAT were literally modeled after IQ tests with a correlation with IQ of 0.82
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10
The first goal is college readiness (of course), but standardized tests are basically cognition tests and are pretty good ones at that.
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 03:52:13 UTC No. 16269925
>>16269918
>SAT subject tests
I just found out they got rid of those in 2021. I'm living under a rock.
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 15:28:56 UTC No. 16270387
>>16267803
She is a woman, she can't understand it
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 17:43:52 UTC No. 16270515
>>16263685
This
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 04:27:19 UTC No. 16271074
>>16269918
I doubt it
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 05:56:34 UTC No. 16271133
>>16271074
Why?
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 06:14:23 UTC No. 16271155
>>16271133
I took sat and this test isn't for high iq. If you learn how to make specific problems in this test you could easily get 800 in math
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 06:27:53 UTC No. 16271169
>>16271155
Nobody said it was for high iq, its for the college bound population. Sure you may be able to get 800 but the not everyone will and we get to compare and contrast different scores with different people to find a bell curve that suits best. That correlation with IQ of 0.82 means something.
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 06:37:24 UTC No. 16271175
>>16256287
Women aren't bad at math. There are just men that are really good at math. Men tend to have higher IQ ranges while women cluster more towards a slightly higher average than like half of men. So women are definitely just as capable. In reality, you would need to define every state like gene x with expression y statistically relates to state z. Then keep doing this for every possible state and relate that to the IQ determinant. I will say men are often smarter because they happen to be statistically more likely to have a high IQ sometimes. High IQ people generally like complex patterns because normal patterns don't hold much meaning.