Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 18:58:57 UTC No. 16257066

>>16257061
Fuck off to reddit

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 21:20:25 UTC No. 16257267

>>16257061
Geologist here.

Back in the 1950s there were two competing ideas in Atmospheric Science about the future direction of our warming or cooling atmosphere. On one side you had increased CO2 in the atmosphere from a century (at the time) of industrialization which would increase temperature. On the other side you had an increase in particulate matter in the atmosphere from burning coal along with Sulfur Dioxide which can block some incoming light from the sun. This was known as "Global Dimming". Back in the middle of the 20th century there was disagreement as to which of the two forces would dominate the other. Would increase CO2 in the atmosphere warm the atmosphere more, or would increased particulate matter from burning coal along with Sulfur Dioxide dim incoming sunlight cool the atmosphere more?

So, in the 1970s two things happened.
#1. The EPA was formed by President Nixon in the US followed by equal environmental laws in Europe. This restricted air pollution and began bringing down levels of particulate matter and Sulfur Dioxide from coal.
#2. Coal was largely replaced as an energy source for oil which burns cleaner than coal. This lead to a further reduction in particulate matter and sulfur dioxide but continued to belch out large amounts of CO2. Although coal is still used in some electricity production it's a fraction of what it once was. Due to environmental regulations it's also burned "cleaner" although this is relative.

So, by the 1980s the evidence was clear. Global dimming was almost entirely overwhelmed by global warming.

Does that answer your question or is this a thread where you're just making accusations and not actually looking for an answer?

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 21:30:58 UTC No. 16257285

>>16257061
50y ago world population was 4 billion

Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:56:38 UTC No. 16258517

>>16257061
Because scientists are chicken little tier idiots who are always trying to get attention by predicting unrealistic scenarios. They have to do that to get attention because they're incapable of doing anything useful or good.

Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 23:46:02 UTC No. 16258946

>>16257267
he is only doing his job and you are making that difficult

Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:07:12 UTC No. 16260152

>>16257061
because scientists are low iq, same reason their global warming predictions never come true

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 07:36:37 UTC No. 16260821

>>16258946

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:32:34 UTC No. 16261508

>>16257267
>Geologist
not a relevant field

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:06:25 UTC No. 16262585

>>16260152
that temperature data is the """corrected""" temperature record, not the real temperature record

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:57:48 UTC No. 16263896

>>16257285
so?