🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 21:42:43 UTC No. 16257305
>he doesn't know about autism's high testosterone and other hormonal abnormalities
>he doesn't know that autism has a deficit of two types of estrogen receptors
>he doesn't know that autism has diminished aromatase, needed to naturally convert testosterone to estradiol
>he doesn't know how necessary a proper hormone balance is to cognitive function
>he doesn't know that schizophrenia symptoms also improve with estrogen
>he doesn't know that autism and ADHD are at increased risk of occurring according in relation to hormonal factors, such as overexposure to hormones in the womb
>he doesn't know that ADHD also has a deficit of an estrogen receptor
>he doesn't know that a larger deficit of this estrogen receptor correlates to higher childhood autism and ADHD scores
>he doesn't know that intake of external hormones ends up coincidentally altering symptoms related to hormone balance
>he doesn't know that mental state improvement on HRT most likely indicates treatment of a hormone imbalance above anything else
>he doesn't know that androgen deprivation can lead to depression
>he doesn't know that castration leads to cognitive decline
>he doesn't know about autism and ADHD associations with fetishism and hypersexuality
>he doesn't know that porn and fetishism create an addictive, mind-altering framework, hijacking sexual gratification as a motivator for transition
>he doesn't know that gender communities act as "unsafe spaces", hijacking social status, belonging, and FOMO as motivators for transition
>he doesn't know how social media and face filters can introduce and reinforce body discomfort and desires of self-alteration
>he doesn't know that abuse can also alter one's body image
>he doesn't know how much of a perfect storm has brewed in ignorance of proper biological/psychiatric study and treatment
>he doesn't know that the transgender crisis could have been avoided by genuine research and common sense
>he doesn't know
>he just doesn't know
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 05:41:23 UTC No. 16257736
>>16257305
All the pro-estrogen stuff you've suggested is offset by the person getting more estrogen becoming more like a woman. Also, only stupid people use social media (4chan doesn't count, you specifically alluded to picture-based, one-on-one interactions or self-re-presentations which anons are quite free to ignore, and which I do ignore by avoiding boards like /soc/ altogether).
Basically I have the hard, hyper-masculine giga-autism which is impervious to trooning out. I hate dumbphones and social media because those are things for stupid little girls. And 90% of the population are, psychologically speaking, stupid little girls.
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 06:34:13 UTC No. 16257780
>>16257305
If you're a tranny you're a schizo. Schizos have a muted difference between the sexes, that is they never develop fully male ir female, but always something in beyween; it isn't so much that you are a female trapped in a male body, but it's more that you aren't completely a man. (or the reverse)
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:05:01 UTC No. 16257843
>>16257305
Some efforts have been made over the last couple years to make the transgender issue all about autism and it's not clear to me why.
I don't think there's any deeper meaning other than autism being some form of embodiment of social deviance. Psychiatric/psychological studies suffer from the problem that they deal with correlates and then derive individual explanations from it when they actually shouldn't. Atypical autobiographic memory has been noted in autism, yet I fail to see what relevance this has on an individual case when, for example, such correlations could easily be down to a tail of outliers, not otherwise representative of the whole cohort.
The sources listed aren't as powerful as it claims to be:
The paper cites the source [131], first page, uses the source to substantiate the claim that autistics exhibit atypical category learning.
The paper says, among other things: "Although hat values and Cook's distance statistics confirmed the robustness of findings (in regards to atypical category learning), results of Egger's test and a funnel plot suggested the presence of publication bias reflecting an overrepresentation of disadvantageous findings for autistic groups. Nearly all of the sources are based on sampling and administring surveys or tests. Such studies suffer from the problem that they're likely biased to begin with and that the result can be pre-determined.
Source [27]: "Androgens Tend to Be Higher, but What about Altered Progesterone Metabolites in Boys and Girls with
Autism" comments: androgen levels are higher in boys and girls with autism, but evidence for progesterone metabolites is much sparser. ...increased CYP17A1 activity has been suggested, the stronger routing towards androgens is further implied in line with our findings of lower progesterone concentrations in boys and girls with autism than healthy controls.
If a research paper says "implied" or "indicates", it means they have no actual proof.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:15:03 UTC No. 16257849
>>16257843
Source [23]: "The promiscuity of the oxytocin-vasopressin systems and their involvement in autism spectrum disorder"
The paper claims that targeting oxytocin/vasopressin systems would improve social deficitis in autism. Oxytocin trials were already made, they failed miserably.
Source [127]: "Association of the androgen receptor gene (AR) with ADHD and conduct disorder"
The paper deals with genetics and is from the '90s. Pretty obsolete.
Source [95]: "Autism genes are selectively targeted by environmental pollutants"
The paper says that practically anything causes autism.
It says: "The increasing incidence of autism suggests a major environmental influence". Unfortunately, the threshold to qualify for autism diagnoses has also been lowered over the years so we would have to analyse that further. The paper fails at identifying any causal agents.
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:56:19 UTC No. 16257947
>>16257305
>I didnt read this