🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 03:05:55 UTC No. 16257578
https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/
"This wiki provides a place where current physics and cosmology theory can be openly challenged, and new and serious philosophies, theories, and models can be proposed without being labeled "pseudo science". Here you will find the scientists, books, scientific papers, websites, and organizations that are on the forefront of fixing today's broken science.
We do not allow for everyone in the public to edit this wiki. Consensus editing is not working. More often then not, solid criticisms and alternatives are relegated to pseudo-science on the simple fact that they are not supported by the mainstream. This of course is not logical. New ideas as never accepted instantaneously. New ideas take time to take hold. This is the knowledge repository for those new ideas and criticisms."
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 19:14:42 UTC No. 16258550
Like there's sports and womens sports, there's physics and alternative physics. If you need a safe space then it's not real science.
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 06:46:51 UTC No. 16259399
Thats a good wiki, they don't just lazily let any old glow in the dark negro edit it like wikipedia does
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 21:48:35 UTC No. 16260296
Sanger was a retard to think that wikipedia would work out. He must've seen how usenet ended up and known that wikipedia would share the same fate inflicted on it by the same people
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 07:29:12 UTC No. 16260814
>>16257578
>More often then not, solid criticisms and alternatives are relegated to pseudo-science on the simple fact that they are not supported by the mainstream.
Reminder that a reference instrument is not a debate instrument. An encyclopedia is not a debate forum, thought it should have clearly identified entries/sections for criticisms and alternatives.
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:44:04 UTC No. 16261689
>>16260814
wikipedia is a propaganda outlet thinly disguised as an online encyclopedia
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:00:01 UTC No. 16262574
>>16258550
<--- heres your physics.
theres no alternative that could be any more disingenuous or fake than that junk it
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:34:56 UTC No. 16263787
good wiki, very weird, exactly the kind of thing old 4chan would've liked
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:21:06 UTC No. 16263849
"dark matter" is literally just rogue jupiters
tons of stars that didn't make it
they're too cold to see because they didn't start fusion
people are just too addicted to their platonic "le solar system" model so they don't intuit it
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:32:58 UTC No. 16263930
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 20:50:03 UTC No. 16264917
>>16263930
>being this butthurt over an alternative to woke wikipedia
pic is what you look like rn