🧵 Exotic numbers
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 00:05:50 UTC No. 16260413
Are there any new exotic number systems being worked on? It fascinates me
List of non standard numbers:
Transfinite numbers: Numbers that are greater than any natural number.
Ordinal numbers: Finite and infinite numbers used to describe the order type of well-ordered sets.
Cardinal numbers: Finite and infinite numbers used to describe the cardinalities of sets.
Infinitesimals: These are smaller than any positive real number, but are nonetheless greater than zero. These were used in the initial development of calculus, and are used in synthetic differential geometry.
Hyperreal numbers: The numbers used in non-standard analysis. These include infinite and infinitesimal numbers which possess certain properties of the real numbers.
Surreal numbers: A number system that includes the hyperreal numbers as well as the ordinals.
Fuzzy numbers: A generalization of the real numbers, in which each element is a connected set of possible values with weights.
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 00:15:54 UTC No. 16260426
>>16260413
About half of your question is a topic of set theory, the other half is answered in a course on algebra.
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 04:57:52 UTC No. 16260684
>>16260413
anything past the natural numbers is schizophrenia.
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:00:27 UTC No. 16261014
>>16260413
Yesterday this guy popped up in my yt feed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 03:30:42 UTC No. 16262370
P-adics are by far the most interesting.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 04:00:19 UTC No. 16262409
>>16260684
natural numbers are "infinite" which is an absurdity and a schizophrenic delusion
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 06:37:01 UTC No. 16262519
>>16260413
Did you make the picture? I'd like to request that you include the constructible and the computable numbers.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 07:38:20 UTC No. 16262558
>>16262409
>natural numbers are "infinite"
You can't name one natural number that is infinite let alone multiple natural numbers that are infinite.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 07:47:51 UTC No. 16262563
>>16260684
>>16262409
>>16262558
https://4chan.org/rules#global
>You will not post any of the following outside of /b/:
>Troll posts
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 07:57:00 UTC No. 16262570
>>16262563
I see you are clearly unable to name a natural number that is infinite, so I accept your concession.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 07:58:28 UTC No. 16262572
>>16262570
Stop trolling.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:04:57 UTC No. 16262583
>>16262572
Stop answering a question that necessitates a natural number with words that clearly have nothing to do with natural numbers.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:05:45 UTC No. 16262584
>>16262583
Your trolling is futile. You are wasting time.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:17:11 UTC No. 16262596
>>16262584
The only thing you can do is waste time to cover up the fact that you will never be able to name an infinite natural number.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:18:34 UTC No. 16262598
>>16262596
Your troll attempt failed. Accept it. Move on.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:21:16 UTC No. 16262602
>>16262598
You are the troll who is still answering number questions with words since you know there is no natural number that is infinite and no way to actually provide an infinite natural number as your answer.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:23:55 UTC No. 16262605
>>16262602
You are trolling nobody but yourself.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:26:53 UTC No. 16262606
>>16262605
You still can't point out a single natural number that is infinite and have to use whiny words to cope with being wrong.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:29:15 UTC No. 16262607
>>16262606
Your trolling is too repetitive.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:32:21 UTC No. 16262611
>>16260413
I invented my own
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:34:15 UTC No. 16262612
>>16262607
>>>/lit/
Since you obviously don't understand how math works and will never mathematically prove your point, go whine on the board made for midwit wordcels like yourself.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:41:20 UTC No. 16262619
>>16262611
Its underpins box math and is the true basis for set theory
[math]0 \circlearrowleft \infty \circlearrowleft 0 \circlearrowleft \infty = \{\{\}\} = 1[/math]
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:41:30 UTC No. 16262620
>>16262607
>Unable to answer a simple math question over and over despite claiming he knows the answer over and over.
>Durr you repetitive.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:44:00 UTC No. 16262624
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:53:22 UTC No. 16262630
>>16262612
>>16262620
Samefagging doesn't save your failed troll.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:58:22 UTC No. 16262633
>>16262630
Responding with more irrelevant words still isn't a proper response to a simple math question >>>/lit/.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:11:49 UTC No. 16262643
>>16262633
Here are some numbers for your trolling: 0/10.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:15:53 UTC No. 16262645
>>16262643
0, you mean like the exact same number of infinite natural numbers you have successfully been able to identify?
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:17:59 UTC No. 16262646
>>16262645
Repeat yourself again, troll.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:28:26 UTC No. 16262651
>>16262646
Keep answering math questions with poorly constructed prose, tard.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:34:16 UTC No. 16262653
>>16260413
Elliptical numbers, complex would be a subset of those.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:35:11 UTC No. 16262654
>>16262651
I don't get it. Can you explain again?
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:51:06 UTC No. 16262672
>>16262654
Obviously you don't get it or you wouldn't keep giving poorly constructed sentences where simple numerical answers are necessitated.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:52:05 UTC No. 16262674
>>16262672
Maybe post it another dozen times, troll?
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:55:17 UTC No. 16262676
>>16262674
Maybe finally admit you can't name any natural number that is infinite, so I don't have to keep pointing out you are wrong and can't answer to your own claim about an infinite natural number.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:57:00 UTC No. 16262677
>>16262676
You will infinitely reply to me with your same lame troll shit.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:58:54 UTC No. 16262679
>>16262677
Not even possible the way threads are designed to expire over time, dipshit, but good job continuing your trend of always being wrong about everything.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:02:12 UTC No. 16262682
>>16262679
Don't ever stop replying. You do want to troll me really hard, don't you?
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:18:04 UTC No. 16262692
>>16262682
No, I know getting corrected triggers your ODD, but I just want you to quit constantly being wrong about everything.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:19:22 UTC No. 16262693
>>16262692
Learn some math, troll.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:19:54 UTC No. 16262694
>>16262693
No, u, dipshit who can only answer math question with retarded prose.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:25:22 UTC No. 16262698
>>16262694
You don't know math, troll.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:28:54 UTC No. 16262701
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:44:23 UTC No. 16262709
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:50:29 UTC No. 16262713
>>16262709
I will as soon as you can use math to show that there is a natural number that is infinite instead of using words to cope with the fact you were wrong.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 11:10:32 UTC No. 16262721
>>16262713
Still trolling, huh?
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 11:33:43 UTC No. 16262731
>>16262721
Still can't actually prove your claims with math and have to type seething sentences of uninteresting text instead, huh?
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 12:05:20 UTC No. 16262745
>>16262731
Your trolling failed. Time to give up.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 12:07:44 UTC No. 16262748
>>16262745
You still aren't doing math, you are still seething about being wrong and being wholly incapable of proving your point using math.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 12:12:32 UTC No. 16262751
>>16262748
I don't even read your replies anymore, you failed troll.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 12:34:58 UTC No. 16262764
>>16262751
Why would you when you know you are going to fail at the task and your best option is to just be snarky and pretend like you aren't a failure at basic math?
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 12:35:50 UTC No. 16262765
>>16262764
Time to learn basic math, troll.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:47:48 UTC No. 16263800
>>16260413
Are there no other transcendental irrationals? What the fuck does a tranny number even mean? Just non-computable? But Pi seems very computable
Help my cute adorable little head understand
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:58:56 UTC No. 16263816
>>16263800
Transcendental (over a particular field) means that it is not a root of a polynomial (with coefficients in that field). Commonly, that field is taken to mean the rational numbers.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:09:15 UTC No. 16263829
>>16262409
>natural numbers are "infinite"
wrong
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:40:55 UTC No. 16263874
>>16263829
Retard
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:47:04 UTC No. 16263883
>>16262765
Yes that is what I have been telling you, its time for you to learn basic math, so you quit trying to answer math questions with snark and poorly constructed sentences that contain no math whatsoever.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:48:50 UTC No. 16263886
>>16263883
Retard
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:50:04 UTC No. 16263888
>>16263886
>t. the retard who still can't name a single infinite natural number, despite screeching about it for days
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:52:16 UTC No. 16263890
>>16263888
You WILL reply endlessly.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:54:02 UTC No. 16263892
>>16263890
Only because you will never be able to actually mathematically prove your point and will just post rambling nonsense that is easily refutable instead.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:55:30 UTC No. 16263893
>>16263888
For every natural number, I generate an infinite number of natural numbers, such that there exists an infinite number of natural numbers that hold an infinite number of natural numbers
>checkmate atheists
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:57:01 UTC No. 16263895
>>16263892
Dance for me, slave
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:02:51 UTC No. 16263902
>>16263895
Keep using retarded words instead of math since you will always be a slave to semantics and will never understand basic math. >>>/lit/
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:03:40 UTC No. 16263903
>>16263893
>inb4 you say I can't generate an infinite amount of natural numbers for each natural number...
In that case, I simply negate all the axioms and formalisms that lead to such a statement being true.
>numbers aren't even real
>cries in logic
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:05:03 UTC No. 16263906
>>16263902
You crave the insults, don't you, moron?
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:09:47 UTC No. 16263907
>>16263906
>t. the wordcel dipshit who is addicted to being insulted for being wholly unable to provide a single math proof of his retarded obviously false claims
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:10:51 UTC No. 16263908
>>16263800
There's an uncountably infinite # of transcendentals, but only a countably infinite # of names we can assign, so practically all of them are unknowable.
The liouville numbers are definitely computable though
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:15:01 UTC No. 16263910
>>16263907
Didn't read.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:17:23 UTC No. 16263913
>>16263910
Why would you when you know it definitely proves you wrong and you can't possibly refute it with actual math, so its much better to just bury your head in the sand and pretend like you aren't always wrong about everything?
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:18:21 UTC No. 16263914
>>16263913
Your stupid
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:22:52 UTC No. 16263916
>>16263914
kek words are your only refuse since you have 0 math ability, yet you're still too retarded to know when to use your vs you're, maybe you shouldn't even go to >>>/lit/ and just need to go back
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:25:36 UTC No. 16263919
>>16263916
Keep trolling, dummy
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:30:26 UTC No. 16263926
>>16263919
I might start trolling when you post a single math equation to prove your claim and make me look as retarded as you have looked this entire thread, until then I am just holding you to your claims while you trololololol and seethe about being retarded and wholly unable to prove your claims.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:31:42 UTC No. 16263928
>>16263919
>>16263926
And watch as you prove once again you are too retarded for math and have to cope and seethe with more retarded words and not a single math equation.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:33:33 UTC No. 16263931
>>16263926
Very low IQ post
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:34:43 UTC No. 16263933
>>16263928
Try harder, troll
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:39:38 UTC No. 16263936
>>16263933
I don't need to, I perfectly predicted how your retardation would express itself >>16263928 and how you still can't do math because you are too busy mashing words together poorly to think and compute for yourself.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:41:10 UTC No. 16263938
>>16263931
There is no reason to label your posts, everyone knows by now and your retarded brain definitely can't provide more insight than onlookers can gleam for themselves.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:44:18 UTC No. 16263941
>>16263936
You WILL reply
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:45:27 UTC No. 16263943
>>16263938
Dedicate your time to me
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:45:54 UTC No. 16263944
>>16263941
You WILL prove once again you are too retarded for math and have to cope and seethe with more retarded words and not a single math equation.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:46:56 UTC No. 16263945
>>16263943
Its better than you dedicating your time to being incorrect about everything all the time.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:48:44 UTC No. 16263948
>>16263944
I'm your girlfriend now
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:49:53 UTC No. 16263950
>>16263945
Humiliation ritual
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:53:52 UTC No. 16263953
>>16263948
>>16263950
Ah, you have a subservient humiliation fetish, no wonder you like being repeatedly proven wrong while talking about yourself on social media.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:00:42 UTC No. 16263960
>>16263953
Projecting
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:05:56 UTC No. 16263969
>>16263960
You brought those things up, submitting to me as my gf and humiliating yourself ritualistically, I am just interpreting your words since you can only seem to use poorly constructed semantics and never any actual math.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:06:37 UTC No. 16263971
>>16263969
Didn't read. You will reply regardless.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:11:17 UTC No. 16263977
>>16263971
As predicted
>>16263944
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:12:54 UTC No. 16263979
>>16263977
Endless reply loop
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:15:13 UTC No. 16263982
>>16263979
Yes that is how being wrong works, you will be wrong forever and someone else will eventually be here with the truth to correct you.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:21:15 UTC No. 16263987
>>16263982
Continue
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:28:51 UTC No. 16263989
>>16263987
Yes you will continue to be wrong until you actually learn math and post mathematical proofs.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:29:51 UTC No. 16263991
>>16263987
>>16263989
But feel free to post more poorly constructed semantics that prove you don't understand basic math.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:30:36 UTC No. 16263992
>>16263989
Projecting
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:31:46 UTC No. 16263993
>>16263991
Le troll face
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:35:59 UTC No. 16263995
>>16263992
Good job proving how wrong you can be and how little understanding you have of the words you use.
>>16263993
Le still not able to understand basic math or post a single math proof face.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:38:21 UTC No. 16263998
>>16263995
Go on
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:39:32 UTC No. 16263999
>>16263998
Ok, here is some math for you to consider since you have yet to post anything math related:
The odds of you ever posting a single math proof to back up your claims (0.00%) multiplied by the amount of times you have been correct in this thread (0) equals 0.00% * 0 = 0.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:41:34 UTC No. 16264003
>>16263999
You failed. Try again.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:46:49 UTC No. 16264008
>>16264003
While I knew you were too stupid for middle school or higher math, I never would have guessed you were also too stupid to understand that 0*0=0.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:50:34 UTC No. 16264011
>>16264008
You WILL reply
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:03:19 UTC No. 16264020
>>16264011
You WILL never post anything related to math because it is far beyond your abilities.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:05:23 UTC No. 16264022
>>16264011
Yet, you WILL seethe and cry with more vague semantics about the fact that you will never be able to prove your claims with basic math.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:13:57 UTC No. 16264029
>>16264020
Say it again
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:15:06 UTC No. 16264032
>>16264022
Dance for me
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:20:40 UTC No. 16264040
>>16264029
Its still true, so why not.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:22:46 UTC No. 16264042
>>16264032
You are the one dancing for me since the closer we get to 300 posts, the closer we get to page 10 and the closer we get to proving that this exchange can't possibly be endless as you keep falsely claims, so all we are doing is getting close and closer to definitely proving you are wrong about everything.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:23:54 UTC No. 16264044
>>16264040
Need more repetition.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:25:13 UTC No. 16264046
>>16264042
You are wrong.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:27:08 UTC No. 16264048
>>16264044
Ok, you haven't posted a single math fact and you don't even know that 0*0=0.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:28:08 UTC No. 16264049
>>16264046
You just have to dance for me a couple hundred more times and find out the hard way you are wrong and there is no way to make this exchange endless.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:29:09 UTC No. 16264050
>>16264048
Say it again.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:30:18 UTC No. 16264051
>>16264049
You will never be free
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:31:16 UTC No. 16264052
>>16264050
Ok, you haven't posted a single math fact and you don't even know that 0*0=0.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:32:53 UTC No. 16264054
>>16264051
You will never name an infinite natural number and you will never be in an endless 4chan thread.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:35:43 UTC No. 16264055
>>16264052
What?
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:36:59 UTC No. 16264056
>>16264054
You will never stop replying
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:39:08 UTC No. 16264059
>>16264056
Now try to prove it with math instead of saying nonsense over and over.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:40:08 UTC No. 16264061
>>16264055
You haven't posted a single math fact and you don't even know that 0*0=0.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:42:08 UTC No. 16264064
>>16264059
False
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:43:17 UTC No. 16264065
>>16264061
Why?
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:45:16 UTC No. 16264068
>>16264064
Correct, your "proof" is false because you don't know how math works.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:46:47 UTC No. 16264070
>>16264065
I am guessing because you are inherently stupid to the point you can't figure out basic kindergarten math, but it could be some kind of brain damage or genetic problem you picked up along the way.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:48:50 UTC No. 16264074
>>16264068
How?
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:49:59 UTC No. 16264076
>>16264070
Why?
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:58:03 UTC No. 16264078
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:59:04 UTC No. 16264079
>>16264076
It makes the most logical sense and your brain damage can be mathematically described in relation to the shear number of times you are wrong in a single thread.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:05:12 UTC No. 16264085
>>16264078
Wrong
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:06:22 UTC No. 16264087
>>16264079
Projecting
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:11:44 UTC No. 16264093
>>16264085
see
>>16263999
>>16264003
You think 0*0=0 is a failing equation because you don't understand basic math.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:13:01 UTC No. 16264096
>>16264087
Yes I am making a statistical projection about how your brain damage influences all your answers to primarily be wrong.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:17:58 UTC No. 16264100
>>16264093
False
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:19:08 UTC No. 16264101
>>16264096
You are wrong.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:20:46 UTC No. 16264104
>>16264100
Nope that post definitely exists for anyone to see, you are getting worse and worse at denying reality as time goes on.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:21:52 UTC No. 16264106
>>16264104
Dumb and wrong
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:22:42 UTC No. 16264109
>>16264101
Only because I probably am still underestimating the total detrimental effects of your brain damage and how it hurts your ability to coherently process reality and do basic logic like kindergarten tier math.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:23:32 UTC No. 16264110
>>16264109
Projecting
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:24:04 UTC No. 16264111
>>16264106
Nope its definitely correct because the posts definitely exist and have their own serial numbers I can still refer to >>16263999 >>16264003.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:26:26 UTC No. 16264114
>>16264110
Yes I am projecting how your brain damage affects your ability to process reality, you just aren't able to screen the projections because of said brain damage and your poor grasp of language.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:37:23 UTC No. 16264120
>>16264111
You are butthurt
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:38:32 UTC No. 16264122
>>16264114
You WILL reply
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:41:32 UTC No. 16264125
>>16264120
Yes, lies being force fed by retarded liars is painful to deal with.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:42:57 UTC No. 16264127
>>16264125
Keep seething
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:43:09 UTC No. 16264128
>>16264122
You WILL remain brain damaged while bumping this thread to the limit with retarded nonsense since you can't do math.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:44:09 UTC No. 16264129
>>16264127
As long as you keep lying, I will complain about it.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:46:08 UTC No. 16264130
>>16264128
Stupid and wrong
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:47:17 UTC No. 16264132
>>16264129
Autism
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:55:55 UTC No. 16264136
>>16264130
Why did you tl;dr my summary of you without getting it down to a single monosyllabic grunt as you tend to do?
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:57:03 UTC No. 16264137
>>16264132
>You have the mental disorder that makes people more likely to be logical and correct about math.
You really dunked on me there, retard.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:06:05 UTC No. 16264142
>>16264136
Retard
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:07:28 UTC No. 16264144
>>16264137
I'm right, your wrong
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:12:57 UTC No. 16264147
>>16264142
There are those grunt we have come to expect.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:14:01 UTC No. 16264149
>>16264144
You are about halfway to finding out how wrong you are when this "endless" thread reaches its limit and goes to the end of the line to die.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:15:40 UTC No. 16264150
>>16264147
Reply
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:16:50 UTC No. 16264153
>>16264149
You have no brain
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:18:38 UTC No. 16264155
>>16264153
damage.
Correct, I have no brain damage.
You on the other hand, don't understand how math or threads work due to your significant brain damage.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:19:41 UTC No. 16264157
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:20:48 UTC No. 16264158
>>16264150
But we need more so you can be proven wrong faster.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:21:48 UTC No. 16264159
>>16264150
If that is ok with you which it is since you clearly don't understand cause and effect very well.