🧵 PDF thread
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 07:18:24 UTC No. 16260805
Post and discuss math and science related books, articles, lecture notes, etc.
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 07:37:05 UTC No. 16260824
>>16260805
I plan on reading this guy. I've gotten through the first two chapters, but the second chapter was a real struggle. Currently learning a bit about topoi, so hopefully my brain can get more accustomed to this level of abstraction.
Your notes look nice, but browsing through, it seems weird that e.g. you spend so long on Schur's lemma. Also, I'm not a fan of the informal style, frequently writing in first person singular or in second person. There's a lot of unnecessary asides, while it seems you maybe skip over important details.
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 07:48:08 UTC No. 16260833
>>16260805
http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.02031
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:24:01 UTC No. 16260988
recommend me a good book on algebraic topology
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:14:05 UTC No. 16261603
>>16260824
Love the way the japanese school treats algebraic geometry. Kato's "Heart of Cohomology" is another book I really like
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 07:07:37 UTC No. 16262540
>The Earth-atmosphere system is in radiative equilibrium with a theoretical solar constant, and all global mean flux density components satisfy the theoretical expectations.
>The greenhouse effect predicted by the Arrhenius greenhouse theory is inconsistent with the existence of this radiative equilibrium.
>Hence, the CO2 greenhouse effect as used in the current global warming hypothesis is impossible.
https://files.catbox.moe/23o4uz.pdf
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:41:38 UTC No. 16262621
>>16262540
>>16261616
stop posting schizo garbage
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 18:33:32 UTC No. 16263086
>>16261616
not math or science
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:32:19 UTC No. 16263782
Johnathan Tooker
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:52:15 UTC No. 16264829
>most recs are memes
really high-brow board here
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 06:25:58 UTC No. 16265553
>>16264551
people have been able to do that since forever ago
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:22:23 UTC No. 16266420
>>16263782
hes dead
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 06:25:41 UTC No. 16267303
>>16266420
Death came for Tookie once, but he was in a neighborhood at infinity with all of the other non-trivial zeroes. Death couldn't tell the difference.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 19:15:51 UTC No. 16269344
>>16268408
kys
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 19:25:55 UTC No. 16269355
>>16269344
>(((you))): I want science to discover the secrets of life extension
>science: Just like you asked, we discovered the secrets of life extension, enjoy
>(((you))): NOOOOOOOO!!! THATS NOT THE ANSWER I WANTED!!!! I NEED A AN ANSWER THAT CONFORMS TO MY MATERIALISTIC SELF CENTERED HEDONIST LIFESTYLE!!!
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 19:29:32 UTC No. 16269359
>>16260988
Spanier is fantastic. Hatcher is very good too. Don't read May, it's full of mistakes and will drive you insane. Bredon I found a bit bizarre and confusing. Same with Fomenko&Fuchs.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 19:40:41 UTC No. 16269378
>>16269355
Who are you quoting? The voices in your head? Get help
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 18:02:27 UTC No. 16270533
>>16264551
there is no formula for gayness you fucking noob
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 18:41:16 UTC No. 16270573
>>16261616
Politicians and Corporations intentionally and not caring killing civilians is not math or science
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 18:42:38 UTC No. 16270575
>>16270533
>ah finally a real boo-
>category theory
goddammit I prefer the schizo /pol/ pdfs more than this shit
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 20:32:31 UTC No. 16270702
>Carbon dioxide is a gas that is of fundamental importance to life as we know it. If its concentration in the atmosphere becomes too low, the bulk of the living things on the surface of the Earth will die, and the surface will become as barren as the other planets in the solar system
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 01:47:49 UTC No. 16272315
In this paper we have reviewed data on climate and temperatures in the past and ascertained that there have been large (non-stationary) temperature fluctuations resulting from natural causes.
Subsequently, we have summarized recent work on statistical analyses on the ability of the global climate models to track historical temperature data. These studies have demonstrated that the time series of the difference between the global temperature and the corresponding hindcast from the global climate models is non-stationary.
Thus, these studies raise serious doubts about whether the global climate models are able to distinguish natural variations in temperatures from variations caused by man-made emissions of CO2.
Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 03:43:38 UTC No. 16275550
>>16270702
Carbon dioxide is more important for life on Earth than O2 is, plants can generate their own O2, but no living creature can make CO2. Life can exist without O2, but not without CO2
Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 03:51:13 UTC No. 16275554
>>16275550
>Life cannot exist without CO2
Yes it can, dumbass.
Anonymous at Thu, 11 Jul 2024 01:14:28 UTC No. 16276779
>>16275554
no it can't
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 06:15:48 UTC No. 16278332
>In conclusion, our MR analysis, utilising large-scale GWAS data, did not find a significant causal association between genetically predicted consumption of red and processed meat, including pork meat, mutton meat, and beef meat, and the risk of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, or stroke.
>These findings suggest that the consumption of red and processed meat are not a contributor to the development of these cardiovascular disease outcomes.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 11:55:20 UTC No. 16278620
>>16276779
you're so stupid i actually feel bad for you
Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 05:20:13 UTC No. 16279913
>>16278620
You're clearly upset and emotional for some reason or other which is why you're attempting to be insulting.
>>16278332
>These findings suggest that the consumption of red and processed meat are not a contributor to the development of these cardiovascular disease outcomes.
Its nice to see someone finally publish what has been plainly obvious to most of humanity for tens of thousands of years.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:45:53 UTC No. 16282000
>>16281072
this paper always massively triggers the low IQ know-it-alls on this board.
they're all so positive they understand nutrition because "mommy said ice cream is bad for you"
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 07:56:40 UTC No. 16283274
>>16279913
>for tens of thousands of years.
several million years
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 02:48:47 UTC No. 16284449
>>16282000
Meds
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 02:53:01 UTC No. 16284454
>>16260805
An article on how first-person consciousness is evidence that physicalism is false
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 02:56:07 UTC No. 16284457
>>16260805
Principia Qualia: Mike Johnson's theories on consciousness
https://opentheory.net/PrincipiaQua
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:37:39 UTC No. 16285651
In the last decade fundamental theoretical equations were developed for describing and under- standing the global average radiative equilibrium state of the Earth-atmosphere system. It is shown that using the well-established laws of radiation physics the key climate parameters of the planet can be deduced theoretically, from purely astrophysical considerations and some plausible assumptions on the material composition of the planetary surface and the structure of the atmos- phere. It is also shown, that the Earth-atmosphere system is in radiative equilibrium with a theo- retical solar constant, and all global mean flux density components satisfy the theoretical expec- tations. The greenhouse effect predicted by the Arrhenius greenhouse theory is inconsistent with the existence of this radiative equilibrium. Hence, the CO2 greenhouse effect as used in the current global warming hypothesis is impossible.
https://www.researchgate.net/public
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 05:33:33 UTC No. 16286055
>>16285651
Kys. you're actively lowering board quality
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:38:31 UTC No. 16286117
>>16284454
>here's the history of the question
>here are the assumptions
and then suddenly
>the virtues of this argument are the following:...
dude, where is the argument itself?
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 09:05:48 UTC No. 16286460
If we aen't purely material then how far do we go?
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 10:03:53 UTC No. 16286709
>>16261616
kek
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 11:54:44 UTC No. 16287046
deeper
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 12:57:16 UTC No. 16287118
>>16263744
>FORTRAN is a bad language in 2023
>"the FORTRAN code itself
has reached 441,668 lines of code. As a result, it can only run on a supercomputer"
Actual retard.
Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 04:26:56 UTC No. 16288054
>>16287118
none of the people using that code understand how or why it was written back in the 1980s, they couldn't produce their own code, thats why they're forced to rely on 40 year old software written back in the days of much more limited computing capability.
the people using the code in the present day are literal cargo cultists
Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 01:08:10 UTC No. 16289076
>>16288054
If that software was any good to begin with then it would have been able to accurately predict in the 1980s the current climatological conditions in the present day. Instead it predicted science fictional trash like massive sea level rise
Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 21:12:08 UTC No. 16290098
>>16269387
Agnotology is the study of how ignorance arises via circulation of misinfor- mation calculated to mislead. Legates et al. (Sci Educ 22:2007–2017, 2013) had questioned the applicability of agnotology to politically-charged debates. In their reply, Bedford and Cook (Sci Educ 22:2019–2030, 2013), seeking to apply agnotology to climate science, asserted that fossil-fuel interests had promoted doubt about a climate consensus. Their definition of climate ‘misinformation’ was contingent upon the post-modernist assump- tions that scientific truth is discernible by measuring a consensus among experts, and that a near unanimous consensus exists. However, inspection of a claim by Cook et al. (Environ Res Lett 8:024024, 2013) of 97.1 % consensus, heavily relied upon by Bedford and Cook, shows just 0.3 % endorsement of the standard definition of consensus: that most warming since 1950 is anthropogenic. Agnotology, then, is a two-edged sword since either side in a debate may claim that general ignorance arises from misinformation allegedly circulated by the other. Significant questions about anthropogenic influences on climate remain. Therefore, Legates et al. appropriately asserted that partisan presentations of controversies stifle debate and have no place in education.
Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 21:34:35 UTC No. 16290128
>>16287118
>As a result, it can only run on a supercomputer
oh no
it's not like every single gamer on earth owns one of those or anything
Anonymous at Sun, 21 Jul 2024 19:39:05 UTC No. 16291250
>>16288054
People in climate science can't do math, thats why they can't write their own code. You can get a climate science degree without passing calculus
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 00:23:56 UTC No. 16291652
>>16260805
I see alot of posting and no discussion.
For most of these I question why you are even reading it beyond macho bullshit reasons like "i like math/science" "hard math/science problem" "filtered"
Are any of these papers interesting to everybody or useful in your work?
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 02:29:51 UTC No. 16292988
>>16291652
>reeeeee stop reading things I don't like!!!!!
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 02:50:52 UTC No. 16294271
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 01:54:21 UTC No. 16295505
>>16291250
inability to do math or think critically is a prerequisite for one on those "degrees"
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 05:49:51 UTC No. 16295676
>>16295505
You cant do math either
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 22:42:53 UTC No. 16296592
>>16260805
This reads like a try-hard just copypasting shit from other books. He's elated that he's manage to accomplish this clever feat.
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 04:03:23 UTC No. 16296916
>>16295676
>either
you're admitting that you can't do math, the fact that you made that admission inadvertently shows of your lack of critical thinking ability
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 04:42:04 UTC No. 16298442
This thread is full of excellent PDFs, plx poast moar
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 03:42:30 UTC No. 16299890
>>16298442
thanks, i posted all the good ones
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 18:58:55 UTC No. 16302205
>>16298442
This
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:05:28 UTC No. 16302222
>>16301053
Did r9k really write that?
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 02:44:56 UTC No. 16305370
>>16303981
>Hidden cardiotoxic effects of mRNA
why did they hide those toxic side effects?
Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 05:06:26 UTC No. 16306622
>>16305370
Scientists only act out of greed and lust for money
Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 05:38:09 UTC No. 16308145
>>16308012
"It is essential to ensure a satisfying relational and sexual life in ASD"
is this really what you are into? retards humping?
Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 03:36:10 UTC No. 16309334
>>16308012
>people who have been diagnosed with autism are all pedophiles
interesting, explains a lot
https://web.archive.org/web/2006071
>The Star Trek connection
>A surprising number of child sex abusers appear to be Trekkies. Trying to figure out what that means, however, shows how little we really know about pedophiles
Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 04:56:42 UTC No. 16309422
>>16260805
>pdf file thread
Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 10:51:43 UTC No. 16309628
Introductory Literature for Natural Language Processing / Computational Linguistics
https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/
Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 13:15:36 UTC No. 16309704
>>16308012
Aren't they diagnosed with autism for less punishment? Because people are often going to diagnose themselves with barely anything just to escape justice.