Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 07:37:20 UTC No. 16260823

>>16260819
That's not IQ, climate change or homework.
Not /sci/

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 07:43:13 UTC No. 16260829

>>16260819
>implying nu/sci/ even knows what geometric langlands let alone rep theory is about

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 07:50:46 UTC No. 16260834

>>16260819
math is fake

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 07:52:46 UTC No. 16260835

>>16260834
>brainlet cope, the post

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 08:16:05 UTC No. 16260852

He wrote sex on the board lol bet that nerd doesn't get any irl

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 09:09:46 UTC No. 16260876

>>16260819
He's not black.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:09:51 UTC No. 16260933

Yes, /sci/ is dead. I still come here occasionally out of habit but usually leave again when I see that nothing changed. The bots and spammers have won. There are no insightful discussion threads anymore. The few knowledgeable posters either left or learned their lesson that making good posts in this shithole is a waste of time and resources. Have fun with your endless "science is fake and gay" and "new climate change clickbait" spam. I can have better discussions about science and math on /pol/, /g/ or /lit/.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:18:29 UTC No. 16260936

>>16260819
>Langlands
>In 2004, mathematicians Edward Frenkel, Dennis Gaitsgory, Kari Vilonen, and Mark Goresky were awarded millions of dollars in the form of a grant by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). The project being funded was to relate the geometric Langlands program to quantum field theory.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:26:29 UTC No. 16260938

>>16260834
>>16260852
>b-but its le fake!!
you retards always say this but then the next atom bomb will use that math. Starting to think youre getting paid to spread this nonsense... the fact that the us military funded this research makes this even more obvious

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:56:25 UTC No. 16260959

>>16260933
Add "climate", "vaccine" and " "how come" to hide filters. Do not reply to spambots and poltards.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:57:40 UTC No. 16260961

>>16260819
Who gives a shit? Mathematicians are all schizophrenics anyway.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:58:34 UTC No. 16260962

>>16260961
exhibit A

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:59:52 UTC No. 16260965

>>16260938
The atom bomb used physics, not math. Literally zero applications will from this conjecture.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:01:37 UTC No. 16260968

>>16260959
Then half of the board is hidden and the remaining threads are still filled with trash like >>16260834 >>16260961
This board is dead and it's time to leave. If you want to discuss science or math just make a thread on /pol/, add some /pol/ buzzwords to make it tangentially ontopic and you'll get exponentially better quality replies than on /sci/.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:02:39 UTC No. 16260970

>>16260968
Only 20 posts hidden with my filters

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:03:14 UTC No. 16260971

>>16260965
the mathematical advances in the 19th century made it possible to seriously study the physics in the first place

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:04:15 UTC No. 16260973

>>16260965
>he doesnt know

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:07:01 UTC No. 16260974

>>16260819
Yukarifag leaving when I realized this board turned to shit

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:09:54 UTC No. 16260978

>>16260971
All those advances were made by physicists. You're delusional

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:15:07 UTC No. 16260981

>>16260965
>zero applications will from this conjecture
quite the bold statement. Can you please explain what geometric langlands is about so I know I won't waste an hour educating a moron?

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:22:03 UTC No. 16260987

>>16260978
No, read up on some history. Especially on the history of modern differential geometry. Ask yourself why Riemannian geometry is named after a mathematician and not a physicist. Also look at Riemanns habilitation thesis, particularly his thoughts on what kind of space we live in

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:06:04 UTC No. 16261017

>>16260933
>/g/
that board is entirely composed of ragebait, spam, and dunning-kruger, I've literally never seen a good in-depth technology discussion there
/tg/, /k/, or very rarely /v/, are the place to talk technology or science

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:26:44 UTC No. 16261025

The only good poster here is Barkon. At least he posts new stuff. The rest is old NPC bollox.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:20:34 UTC No. 16261066

>>16260938
Lmao cope of a weak ass nerd nigga
noone cares lmao

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:32:47 UTC No. 16261072

>>16260819
langlands is some of the most incomprehensible bullshit in all of mathematics. most professional mathematicians don't even have any idea what the fuck is going on

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:33:12 UTC No. 16261073

>>16260834
>algebra is fake
ftfy

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:39:08 UTC No. 16261077

>>16260981
Yeah yeah, you're either a schizophrenic number theorist or a pedophilic string theorist. Either way you're a chronic liar. Not going to play your cancerous game. If an application exists, it's on you to say what it is. Otherwise the default position is to assume it has no applications.
>>16260987
Riemann was a physicist and a mathematician. You're conflating his works.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:44:55 UTC No. 16261085

>>16261077
NTA, but you're delusional.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 14:15:17 UTC No. 16261121

>>16261077
Virgin detected

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 15:17:44 UTC No. 16261195

>>16260819
Geometric langlands seems a bit idealistic though it already has a good track record.
How long until this gets peer reviewed?

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 16:57:22 UTC No. 16261403

>>16261072
>>16261077
>>16260936
>all the retards that got filtered by langlands proudly presenting their low IQ

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 16:59:28 UTC No. 16261410

>>16261195
given that the proof is very long and there are hardly any people qualified to review it, I'd guess a year or two, slightly longer than perelman's proof

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:08:18 UTC No. 16261439

>>16261077
Edward Witten is literally studying geometric langlands too lol. Ask yourself why the greatest physicist currently alive would do that if it were a meme with 0 applications. Want something with actually no applications? Look no further than combinatorics research

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:11:45 UTC No. 16261446

99% of this board doesn't understand what Langland's conjectures even are (me included), nor could we even if we dedicated years to learning it.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:13:35 UTC No. 16261450

>>16261439
>Ask yourself why the greatest physicist currently alive would do that
Roger Penrose isn't doing that, as far as I'm aware.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:15:09 UTC No. 16261454

>>16261077
Meh. It seems, unlike pop-sci ranting in the internet, that string theory dominates theoretical physics. Quantum gravity called swampland program, holography used to blackhole information and condensed matter, mirror symmetry and geometric Langlands in math.

I used to have prejudice on string theory, but I changed my mind because it flourishes in the academia

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:17:12 UTC No. 16261458

>>16261446
This. I have a math degree and I'm still far away from understanding Langland. It seems to be a topic only for a small elite of research mathematicians. I admire those who are wise enough.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:17:33 UTC No. 16261459

>>16261450
Penrose basically died 20 years ago. He wrote a great book on spinors but what he did in the past decades is hot fucking garbage. That quantum brain bullshit is only the tip of the iceberg. Going on Jordan Peterson and Weinstein's podcast really showed how much he lost it. Meanwhile Witten is still going strong

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:18:26 UTC No. 16261461

>>16261450
I'm sure Penrose is interested in this. He's not only a physicist but also a mathematician.

>>16261459
So far he was right about microtubules.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:21:27 UTC No. 16261469

>>16261459
I actually talked to him a few years back and he was the sharpest octogenarian (he wasn't yet 90, at the time) I've ever met, by far. Him talking to Jordan Peterson, which was by all accounts a terrible discussion and that was largely due to Peterson being a moron. In person he showed remarkably little sign of any cognitive decline at all, at least in my brief time chatting with him.
Witten might be a bit sharper at the moment, but he's also quite a bit younger, and my comment was tongue in cheek anyway.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:24:27 UTC No. 16261479

>>16261459
>>16261469
holy fuck dont remind me of Peterson's interview. He couldn't stop himself from interrupting Penrose and making some long off-topic comment on something hardly related. It was painful listening to Penrose attempting to explain Godel incompleteness to Peterson and him just babbling over non-determinism.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:25:00 UTC No. 16261484

>>16261469
>Him talking to Jordan Peterson, which was by all accounts a terrible discussion and that was largely due to Peterson being a moron
(meant to finish)... has little bearing on Roger's own mind, beyond his apparent inability to judge who's capable of holding a quality conversation and who isn't.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:26:37 UTC No. 16261489

>>16260834
>>16261077
>string theory is le fake and gay
reality has inherent hidden degrees of freedom described by a degree-3 algebraic hyperkahler curve embedded in Kaluza-Klein-esque compact dimensions. We have literally shown this experimentally

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:30:44 UTC No. 16261501

>>16261077
>it has no applications even doe the US military is funding it
Kek.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 17:55:11 UTC No. 16261553

>>16260970
Get better filters

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:41:10 UTC No. 16261681

>>16261077
yikes

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 20:12:37 UTC No. 16261862

>>16261489
>KK shown experimentally
Meds. Now. Does your mom know you're in pain?

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 20:13:20 UTC No. 16261864

>>16260819
Post your nose, OP.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 20:15:20 UTC No. 16261870

>>16260933
Everyone knows this
If i deploy a chan that lives on blockchain event logs would you pay to post?

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 20:17:20 UTC No. 16261872

>>16261864
>nose fetishist back at it

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 20:27:24 UTC No. 16261886

>>16260961
how come

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 05:32:07 UTC No. 16262475

>>16261025
samefag

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 07:18:33 UTC No. 16262549

>>16261870
Sure I'd pay to call you a faggot on the blockchain.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 07:36:27 UTC No. 16262556

>>16260819
I like how you were THAT mad about not getting enough attention that you made two threads >>16261086

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 08:40:37 UTC No. 16262618

>>16262556
>>16261864
>>16262549
>l-let me talk about politics on a math and science board!!!
back to /pol/ with you, subhuman

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 13:59:12 UTC No. 16262823

>>16262618
I never talked about politics.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 14:02:00 UTC No. 16262827

>>16260819
We have more pressing matters at hand such as Covid and why you should take ur Vaccine

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:09:29 UTC No. 16262939

>>16260819
Dropped out of school in 8th grade and have been a day laborer ever since reporting in

After clicking like 20 Wikipedia links my understanding of this conjecture is that it describes the "shapes" that arise from the boundaries and angles of "shapes" of both internal and external "shapes" relative to the empty space now defined as a "shape".

Is this right? Why does this matter? Is this not just measuring shit?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 17:44:50 UTC No. 16263043

>>16262939
It is essentially a translation exercise, which reformulates one field of mathematics into another field. It's important because it reveals answers one field otherwise wouldn't have.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 17:52:08 UTC No. 16263051

>>16260933
Trannys killed it not random Anons. Trust the science bro. Current year science is pozzed AF.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 17:55:18 UTC No. 16263054

>>16262939
You should start studying again

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 18:08:52 UTC No. 16263064

>>16260819
Can you even describe it rather than just making a clickbait remark then linking it? I didn't click your link, btw.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 18:32:31 UTC No. 16263085

>>16263064
bot post

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 18:39:42 UTC No. 16263093

>>16262939
congrats anon, youve figured it all out

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 18:41:33 UTC No. 16263095

>>16260938
He's right, you know

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:20:19 UTC No. 16263125

>>16260819
>A few weeks ago
That's a lifetime in maths. We've moved on. Sorry you missed it.
Maybe the arcives are more your speed than a real time discussion board.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:23:52 UTC No. 16263129

>>16263125
>That's a lifetime in maths
You've got to be joking.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:32:16 UTC No. 16263143

>>16263129
You're still going on about something we discussed minutes ago?!?
Please try and keep up. Maybe you'll find the introductory course more your speed.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:38:06 UTC No. 16263153

>>16263125
learn to read. OP said /sci/ didnt care when the proof first came out which seems to be true as I can't find anything in the archives

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:56:12 UTC No. 16263191

>>16260819
this is what "culture war" gets you
everything of quality has moved into little enclaves and secret societies, except they aren't secret because they still rely on social media and communication infrastructure.
it's gonna get more and more impossible to just lurk, you'll have to prove yourself and meet standards to the point where you may as well just interact and live in the real world.
which isn't that bad of a fate, it's just a shame that the real point/utility of the internet was lost because some warlord freaks wanted more power.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:57:16 UTC No. 16263196

"the pinnacle of warfare approaches the formless"
- sun tzu

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 21:11:48 UTC No. 16263303

>>16263153
Bitch, you learn to read. We have moved on.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 01:57:28 UTC No. 16263634

>>16262939
How dare you

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:22:16 UTC No. 16263765

>>16263085
Nah he makes a fair point. If OP is upset about this result not getting any attention on /sci/, the least he could do is start the discussion by giving a little bit of an overview for people who are unfamiliar with it.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:26:39 UTC No. 16263771

>>16263765
no it's not a good point at all. Just look it up, you'll find hundreds of posts on stackexchange if you want to be spoonfed that badly.
Besides, it is a major proof. OP shouldn't have to explain jack shit. A math board that doesn't know of geometric langlands isn't a math board at all

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:29:08 UTC No. 16263776

>>16263771
So why even bother making the thread? Just to complain?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:30:22 UTC No. 16263779

>>16263776
retard

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:32:22 UTC No. 16263783

>>16260819
I think one of the biggest improvements that could possibly be made to /sci/ would be to autoban anyone who posts with anything entered into the name field.
/sci/ namefags are invariably schizos who literally reply to themselves to converse with the voices in their heads. Namefags are shit on every board but it is absolutely fucking startling how much worse they are on here.
Another major improvement would be banning all discussions related to climate change, vaccines, IQ, and race.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:34:47 UTC No. 16263786

>>16263303
No, we haven't. Cope harder

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:35:52 UTC No. 16263788

>>16262939
What the fuck did you read to come to that conclusion?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:38:38 UTC No. 16263790

>>16263064
read the paper dumbfuck. The 5th paper even clearly outlines the importance of the proof

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:40:04 UTC No. 16263791

>>16260819
i have a masters in mathematics and even i didn't understand the paper

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:40:06 UTC No. 16263792

>>16263771
>I shouldn't have to explain why I'm upset, you should know why
Literally passive-aggressive women's logic. If you want to talk about the proof, actually talk about the proof (in /mg/ perhaps?). Don't just make a thread simply whining about how nobody else is talking about it.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:41:26 UTC No. 16263793

>>16263792
Are you okay, anon? This has nothing to do with what I've said

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:42:11 UTC No. 16263795

>>16261886
because brainlets can't imagine shit like mathematicians do

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:44:21 UTC No. 16263796

>>16261446
Eric Weinstein got you. Just read the following books: http://theportal.wiki/wiki/Read
This will get you there in no time

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:45:32 UTC No. 16263798

>>16260933
best post ITT

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:47:06 UTC No. 16263799

>>16263783
There should be a health care or COVID board like on Komica

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:50:20 UTC No. 16263804

>>16263791
probably because you got it in applied math

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:54:38 UTC No. 16263808

>>16260965
>i am too retarded to understand it so it must have no use
good thing youre not an authority on math and will never be

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:55:14 UTC No. 16263809

>>16263804
i had both applied and pure, but never studied functors. the subject seems interesting

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:01:19 UTC No. 16263819

>muh conjecture
No one cares, nerd. There's nothing "important" about this irrelevant squiggle crap. This doesn't do anything to improve the state of the world or all the problems occurring. Talk about real science, not chalkboard playtime for virgins.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:04:58 UTC No. 16263822

>>16263819
another filtered retard

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:07:02 UTC No. 16263826

>>16263819
>This doesn't do anything to improve the state of the world or all the problems occurring
the conjecture probably won't improve the state of the world right now, but it might in the future. mathematicians don't prove stuff for the better good of the world, they prove because they like to. it's like a challenge for mathematicians.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:07:37 UTC No. 16263827

>>16263809
to be fair the people at bonn research a lot of very exotic topics.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:08:21 UTC No. 16263828

>>16260933
>There are no insightful discussion threads anymore
There never were. More revisionist history retard shit from newfags. I was on /sci/ in 2010, it was exactly the same.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:10:09 UTC No. 16263830

>>16263819
>a conjecture claiming there are massive connections between geometry and algebra
>even studied by hundreds of physicists
>"b-but it has no use!!"

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:11:24 UTC No. 16263833

>>16263822
>f-f-filtered!!
>for my shitty nerd masturbation ritual
oh nooo not the heccin matherinos
not the heccin conjecture that cant be used for anything
not the retard time wasting grabassery

>>16263826
>morons who spend all time masturbating over games they make up for themselves actually believe they're "cHaNgInG tHe wOrLd"
you spend all day playing the math equivalent of wordle and then get pissed that "THE BOARD IS DYING BECAUSE NO ONE PAYS ATTENTION TO MY SHIT ANYMORE!!"

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:12:25 UTC No. 16263834

>>16263830
>i-it's even studied by hundreds of OTHER time-wasting masturbating retards who don't contribute!!!! you have to listen to MUH AUTHORITY!

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:12:39 UTC No. 16263835

>>16263828
in 2010, you didn't have bots like >>16263833

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:13:40 UTC No. 16263837

>>16263834
Edward Witten does contribute though?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:14:03 UTC No. 16263838

>>16263830
Holy shit, do consensus slaves really?

>>16263835
>You dared to criticize my irrelevant garbage? Y-you must be a bot!
Embarrassing.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:14:12 UTC No. 16263839

>>16263833
why are you even on this board

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:15:05 UTC No. 16263842

>>16263838
don't reply to me, filth

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:44:06 UTC No. 16263878

>>16263799
I honestly don't think it would help. They already have appropriate boards to discuss politics and conspiracy theories, but it doesn't stop them doing it everywhere else. A lot of the posters shitting up this board and the rest of the website (outside of /pol/ and /x/ where they belong) with COVID/vax/etc stuff are doing it because they think they're going to redpill people or own the libtards.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:36:11 UTC No. 16263996

Holy shit /sci/ is such a shit tier board. It's just a bunch of brain dead 5 year olds.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:39:42 UTC No. 16264000

>>16263878
>to redpill people or own the libtards
Does this actually work?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:14:08 UTC No. 16264030

>>16263783
Just fucking ban politics. Everyone knows that’s the #1 factor in terrible quality posts.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:23:37 UTC No. 16264043

>>16260819
well nobody talks about it because even among legitimate mathematicians over 90% of people cannot comprahend it
its impact for the field may be quite big but in itself its a very narrow niche

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:19:57 UTC No. 16264102

>>16260819
>one of the most important conjectures in math
Conjectures in hyper-specialized fields that only six people in the world bother to tackle aren't sexy, especially when those conjectures are young.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:27:18 UTC No. 16264115

/sci/ is just a bunch of political activists, schizos and high school science students. The implication being it doesn't have any top tier people in sciences or math anymore.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:17:57 UTC No. 16264195

>>16263771
>Just look it up, you'll find hundreds of posts on stackexchange
Sounds like there's no reason for it to be here. Stay on stack exchange if you like it so much better there

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:25:19 UTC No. 16264202

>>16264195
90% of scientists and math nerds have already anon, and other smaller less well-known online spaces

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:35:10 UTC No. 16264209

>>16263788
I started with Laplands Conjecture and clicked most of the links related to that

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:37:31 UTC No. 16264211

>>16264209
Langland*

see I don't even know what it's called

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langlands_program

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galois_group

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automorphic_form

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_representation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_group

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_field

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adele_ring

that'll give you a better idea

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 12:20:41 UTC No. 16264233

>>16264202
I just went to discord communities with friends or GitHub for colleagues. Calling people here retards is my outlet

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:48:59 UTC No. 16264821

>>16264233
Laughing at /sqt/ questions is mine

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 03:56:31 UTC No. 16265385

>>16260933
>Create containment board for people with opinions you don't like.
>Get pissed off that they have their own board full of opinions you don't like, so pay libtard shills to drive them out.
>It works and they start coming here.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:11:49 UTC No. 16266141

>>16265385
based retard

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:45:44 UTC No. 16266170

>>16260933
>newfag just discovered 4chan is a waste of time
And is that what passes for a reaction pic these days? Say it ain't so.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:57:14 UTC No. 16266182

>>16260968
>/pol/-covid-tourists have shitted up and killed the board.
>Making a thread on /pol/ will somehow be better.
Huh?

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:02:12 UTC No. 16266194

>>16260959
Added "global warming" and "aliens"

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:03:49 UTC No. 16266201

>>16266182
Those spammers on /sci/ are not even genuine /pol/tards. They don't care about politics or political arguments, they just want to shit up /sci/ with lowest quality. The quality on /pol/ is much higher.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:05:30 UTC No. 16266209

>>16266170
>muh reaction pics
Go with the times, grandpa. We have tiktok now

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:15:47 UTC No. 16266227

>>16261017
yeah /g/ is on LTT niveau.
millions of cs students meet somewhere else..

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:19:23 UTC No. 16266413

>>16266201
yeah I doubt that kek

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:02:06 UTC No. 16266494

>>16260819
You should have translated it into simple english if you want us to care (I'm not even a mathematician, and I'm pretty sure that most of mathematicians are in some other fields, so they wouldn't understand it in the hardcore form as well)

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:10:54 UTC No. 16266500

>math
>proven
you do understand that math only exists to describe reality, right?
Reality doesnt describe math, math describes reality
Its not real, like how the word "tiger" isnt literally a tiger, but a series of symbols used to describe an animal

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:11:35 UTC No. 16266505

>>16266494
>You should have translated it into simple english if you want us to care
intellectual welfare

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:13:10 UTC No. 16266508

>>16266500
t. Terrence Howard

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:13:55 UTC No. 16266509

>>16266500
>Its not real, like how the word "tiger" isnt literally a tiger, but a series of symbols used to describe an animal
Surprisingly well said

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:16:40 UTC No. 16266513

>>16266508
new flavor of the month /sci/ tourist spam?
i saw 5 minutes of that guy on JRE and had to turn it off, have no idea how joe can platform an unironic schizo like that

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:24:42 UTC No. 16266530

>>16266505
Actually, since we pay their salaries, they should translate their stuff into human. With neuronets at hand it shouldn't be much of a trouble.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:26:03 UTC No. 16266532

>>16266500
>Its not real, like how the word "tiger" isnt literally a tiger, but a series of symbols used to describe an animal
this is what you learn in high school math if you're not two digit IQ.
equations represent physical spaces in graphs

Edward Witten has already said geometric Langlands could be useful for S duality in quantum physics.

do you actually know any math?

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:28:03 UTC No. 16266537

>>16266532
>do you ACTUALLY know MATH bro??????
>but the MATH bro!
thinking math is real is the ultimate midwit trap, thanks for playing

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:33:25 UTC No. 16266542

lmao /his/ and /lit/ are far better academic boards than /sci/, /psg and a few other threads are the only reason why I come here, the rest is all global warming deniers that sit in their air-conditioned basement and act like all's right with the world as long as they get their Wendy's takeout

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:33:53 UTC No. 16266543

>>16266500
Tigers aren't real.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:34:48 UTC No. 16266545

>>16266543
now youre thinking like a physicist!

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:43:12 UTC No. 16266569

>>16266545
The tiger has yellow and black stripes because he is an oscillating superposition of a lion and a black panther.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:46:34 UTC No. 16266579

>>16266569
my prediction is that the black stripes are actually dark matter
brb gonna go write a paper about it

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:51:19 UTC No. 16266591

>>16266579
include me as co-author bro

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:56:49 UTC No. 16266605

>>16266591
co author?
bro youre the one reviewing it

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:08:13 UTC No. 16266624

>>16260819
If only you knew how bad things really are

https://archive.org/details/2015-4chan-janitor-channel-leak

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 02:38:36 UTC No. 16267040

>>16266532
>Edward Witten
Who the fuck cares what this grifter has to say? Not a single one of his physical models is falsifiable. Let me frame the question as followed: what, specifically does he do to benefit society?

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 02:48:46 UTC No. 16267052

>>16260834
It's not fake but mathematicians are indeed retarded symbol manipulators who usually can't explain what their symbols mean. Best I can tell is that they're like monkeys hammering at typewriters until some lucky monkey finds the right combination of symbols that makes the other monkeys nod

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 02:50:14 UTC No. 16267053

>>16261489
Lol you can't even explain what any of that jargon means without introducing more undefined jargon

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 03:40:37 UTC No. 16267134

>>16260819
The whole site is comped. The Riemann proof was posted multiple times, and no one cared. In fact, they purposefully let the thread slide. Sci would die if it wasn't astroturfed and kept alive day after day. Hardly anyone posts anything here, and most of what is posted is regurgitate. It's mostly an empty honey pot.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 06:21:00 UTC No. 16267302

>>16260819
>most important conjectures in math
If it's so important then why its wiki page is so short? Checkmate, another nothingburger.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 07:16:14 UTC No. 16267345

>>16267052
>>16267053
>>16267302
>>16266494
>s-spoonfeed me!!!

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 07:50:02 UTC No. 16267367

>>16267345
This, but unironically.
Spoonfeed us.

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 08:11:59 UTC No. 16267379

>>16267345
I don't think there is anybody smart enough to spoonfeed it unironically.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 08:22:20 UTC No. 16267382

care to explain a bit what makes this important? any way this will affect regular ppl in their lifetime?

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 10:58:35 UTC No. 16267464

>>16261489
>Kaluza-Klein-esque compact dimensions. We have literally shown this experimentally
Lol. Lmao even.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:05:26 UTC No. 16267467

>>16267382
Here I'll help, because the mathfags and crypto physicsfags (i.e. string theorists) are too embarrassed to answer honestly.
>Math problem too hard
>Show it's equivalent to potentially easier problem
>(N.B. Easier problem not even solved—begging question of how it's identified as easier)
>PROGRESS!
That's literally all this is. It's a fucking nothing burger. They're treating it like the second coming of the cds/antidesitter correspondence. You know, the most widely cited paper in all of theoretical physics. The same topic that's string theory, has not been experimentally validated in any kind of way, and has more citations than ckm's landmark papers (theoretically predicting heavier generations of quarks), higgs landmark paper, feynmans papers, etc. all of whom are nobel laureates, induced paradigm shifts in theoretical physics... Yeah cited less than the cds/antideshitter paper. Why? Because the string theory grifters all cite each other and pass all their papers through peer review and don't give a shit about applications let alone actually modeling reality. These are the same fags crying that nobody is talking about the reimann proof, as if anyone other than they do gives a shit.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:08:49 UTC No. 16267469

>>16261454
>string theory dominates theoretical physics
Yeah and it poisoned that well so badly that the OG theoretical physicists had to coin a new field of study called phenomenology just to divorce themselves from the cancer that theoretical physicists have become. Pheno is what physics theory USED to be because it got coopted by stringfags

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:12:19 UTC No. 16267472

>>16263826
>mathematicians don't prove stuff for the better good of the world, they prove because they like to
Remind me again why they deserve govt funding to jerk off?

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:50:41 UTC No. 16267782

>>16260819
I still need to memorize my times tables lol.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 06:58:56 UTC No. 16268620

>>16260834
t. undergrsd that just learned of limits

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 12:57:24 UTC No. 16268907

>>16260834
Jews

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:05:05 UTC No. 16268916

>>16260938
>Starting to think youre getting paid to spread this nonsense... the fact that the us military funded this research makes this even more obvious
I think the massive influx of shit quality posts here isn't done by humans. I think it's actually an experimental deradicalisation campaign where people flood the chans with bots to lower the quality so much that people in spaces with anonymity are forced to leave due to how insufferable the discussion gets.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:10:38 UTC No. 16268922

>>16260819
At the very least I can assure you anon that in this ocean of nonsense some folks read this and do care. I'm one of them.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:16:43 UTC No. 16268932

>>16260819
>Wtf happened to this board?
People without a clue about the topics can't refuse to give their opinions.
Trolling is constant.
Uneducated just wants to dismiss what they don't like for what ever reason.
/sci/ guys with self-respect is just moving on as things are not getting better

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 19:16:53 UTC No. 16269346

>>16268932
this

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 05:35:28 UTC No. 16270006

>>16268916
>>16260938
I also think it's bots flooding /sci/

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 05:56:18 UTC No. 16270031

>>16266201
>the guy who screams about /pol/tards nonstop is actually a /pol/tard
Is anyone here surprised?

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 08:46:57 UTC No. 16270082

>>16260819
>/sci/ is dead
It's not just /sci/. 4chan in general is dead. When was the last time this community created a new meme? I don't even remember. All the hot new memes like hawk tuah or skibidi toilet come from tiktok now.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 10:38:14 UTC No. 16270143

>>16270082
It's not though. Other boards have significantly better quality than /sci/.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 11:07:54 UTC No. 16270169

>>16270143
then spend time there instead of whining here