Image not available

220x229

typical greedy sc....jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Scientific journals have a credibility problem.

Anonymous No. 16261630

Scientific journals have a credibility problem.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/06/24/scientific-journals-covid-credibility/

>What we see here is a crisis caused by bad incentives. Publishers charge anywhere from $1,000 to $12,000 for publishing a single open-access article. Every time the publisher rejects a submission, they lose potential revenue. This creates a strong economic incentive to lower the quality standards โ€” a temptation that many publishers cannot resist.

An epidemic of scientific fakery
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/06/11/scientific-journals-retractions-paper-mills/

>A record number of retractions โ€” more than 10,000 scientific papers in 2023. Nineteen academic journals shut down recently after being overrun by fake research from paper mills. A single researcher with more than 200 retractions.

>The numbers donโ€™t lie: Scientific publishing has a problem, and itโ€™s getting worse. Vigilance against fraudulent or defective research has always been necessary, but in recent years the sheer amount of suspect material has threatened to overwhelm publishers.