Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 14:26:37 UTC No. 16262848

The first sentence in the article answers your question. So fuck off.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:00:55 UTC No. 16262890

>>16262844
Pajeets will save CERN. We should be grateful that a superior population will show CERN how it's done

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:09:48 UTC No. 16262896

>NO, YOU HAVE TO REJECT RELIGION IF YOU LIKE LE SCIENCE YOU CANNOT APPRECIATE THE EXPRESSION AND CULTURE DURING THE OLD DAYS IF IT RESEMBLES RELIGION REEEEEEE
just a symbol, retard
If I had the chance to steal some catholic statue I'll do it

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:14:26 UTC No. 16262899

>>16262844
It's explained in your image, it's a gift from India.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:52:07 UTC No. 16262930

>>16262896
I thought scientists believed in the Big Bang, not Shiva, dancing the universe to existence

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:04:10 UTC No. 16262936

>>16262844
>The statue is a gift from India, celebrating CERN's long association with India
>As a plaque alongside the statue explains, the belief is that Lord Shiva danced the Universe into existence, motivates it, and will eventually extinguish it.
>Carl Sagan drew the metaphor between the cosmic dance of the Nataraj and the modern study of the 'cosmic dance' of subatomic particles.

Personally, I wouldn't have accepted the presence of an explicitly religious symbol in a scientific environment.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:10:52 UTC No. 16262943

>>16262936
Big bang. Catholic priest. Blah blah blah, you don't need to hear it again.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:16:36 UTC No. 16262953

>>16262943
I don't see your religious symbol. A man of faith can be a man of science. And the "big bang" has no religious connotation. If he'd called it "the word of God" and people had continued to call it that (inconceivable, but hey), then I'd have seen a problem with that too.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 20:07:47 UTC No. 16263211

I've also heard there are some hieroglyphics like shit in the detectors??

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:59:39 UTC No. 16263959

>>16262844
Soiyence faggots love to shit all over Christianity and pretend they're doing so because of a general disdain for religion, but when other religions are being discussed the soiyence twats always become reverent and respectful. Why is that? Why does Christianity get singled out for special hatred?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:05:45 UTC No. 16263968

Atheism, Hinduism & Mahayana, Zen, Vajaryana, Dzogchen are a monistic Universalism: the totality exists & nothing else. There is no multiplicity, everything is absolutely identical. This is qualified of acosmatic.
They mix this view with a huge amount of symbols, incantations, rituals, worship, idolatry, mantras, deities, chanting, entertainment, lengthy Scriptures with thousands of verses, sacrifice & sacred objects, & rules for lay people in order to create a religion.
For those gurus, people have the knowledge that they have a true nature, but people are misguided on what they take as their true nature. This is why they say that people are already enlightened, they just do not know about it... The true nature of people is not the 5 senses or their objects, but the mind itself with the world [loka] itself identified with the cosmos, or their deification of this, ie their Brahma or their Buddha or non-duality, & when people realize this they are enlightened. The way to realize this is by relying on lots of sacrifice, chantings & rituals, also on material objects which magically purify the minds for them, like sounds, logic, mantras, little beads, amulets.
Mahayana-Hinduism tries to make a human society, some political system too.

It is only when there is a allegedly good creator [a god or just ''nature''] that it makes sense to ask the usual question ''why the cosmos produce things which do not know that they are the cosmos?'' ie ''why some good god did not get people to be born directly enlightened? instead of being born unenlightened which produces lots of suffering?''
So far the Hindus have no answer to this ''problem of evil''. They keep replying with their main dogma, ie ''because people do not know their true nature, which is pure primordial mind & cannot be described'' & that's their pathetic cope...

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:06:47 UTC No. 16263972

>>16263968
in Buddhism, there is no non-duality, people do not have a true nature, people are not the cosmos, people are not Brahma, people do not come from Brahma, people are not nibanna, people do not come from nibanna, people are not Buddha, people do not come from a buddha, people are not their mind, people are not loka, people are not born already enlightened. In Buddhism there is only craving for pretty things & the pretty ideas of having ''a true nature'', & there is the opposite: a lack of craving for pretty things & pretty ideas. People get enlightened when they stop craving for those. The way to get enlightened is to purify the mind, however not with useless incantations & rituals nor with magical objects, nor worship, unlike the Hindus do, but with the mind itself, ie all the time inclining [with the mind] the mind towards what the buddha calls good qualities & then directly knowing the mind as it really is, which is anicca, dukkha, anatta [contrary to what the hindus say], which is the condition for dispassion, dispassion which is the condition for liberation, liberation which is the condition for direct knowledge that dukkha is ended.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 23:10:51 UTC No. 16265109

>>16263959
>Why does Christianity get singled out for special hatred?
because Jesus flipped over some kikes' tables 2000 years ago

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:31:26 UTC No. 16266256

>>16262844
How many Christian religious monuments do they have at scientific institutions in India?
Other than their technology, all of which was invented for them by Christians

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:46:47 UTC No. 16266281

>>16263968

Ah yes, le good ol "we are all the same" bs. Lumps atheism with buddhist schools and hinduism. Allow me to pill you:

> hindus believe in souls, buddhists don't and majority of atheists don't
> hindus and buddhists believe in reincarnation, atheists don't unless they're eternal return theorists
> hindus and some atheists assert a monistic universalism, buddhists and existentialist/nihilist atheists instead assert in the intrinsic nothingness of things
> atheists generally don't believe in a path to salvation, hindus believe in moksha and buddhists in nirvana
> atheist psychology is informed by cognitive science and neuroscience, or psychoanalysis at worst, hindus and buddhists believe it is influenced by cosmic karma across one's rebirths

I could go on. No, atheism is not hinduism is not buddhism is not atheism. There, there's your wheel of reincarnation

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:49:03 UTC No. 16266286

>>16262844
they fire big thing around in a metal circle
they want statue with metal fire circle
hindu god has ring of fire
hindu god looks badass
got badass ring of fire statue for ring of fire facility
simple

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:00:02 UTC No. 16266379

>>16263972
Complete contradiction. Mind has no reason to be any other way. The more or less, good or bad, are value judgements. Moreover, they are steeped in your existence, culture, and upbringing. What sort of true mind rejects what is before it?

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 06:59:30 UTC No. 16267327

>>16266256
>How many Christian religious monuments do they have at scientific institutions in Europe?
none, but they have hindu ones

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 05:14:05 UTC No. 16268520

>>16267327
No doubt they have jewish ones too

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 03:15:24 UTC No. 16269896

>>16266256
>Other than their technology, all of which was invented for them by Christians

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 03:56:07 UTC No. 16269929

>>16262844
>the statue is a gift from India
The article answers the question for you, retard.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 04:43:30 UTC No. 16269967

>>16262844
1. It was a gift
2. Scientists are giant fucking nerd losers. It's the same reason they come up with smug acronyms for everything.

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 04:25:36 UTC No. 16271070

>>16262930
scientists don't have consistent beliefs, their beliefs are conditional.