Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:15:38 UTC No. 16263120

Glad he's finally taking a break from Musk after getting BTFO with FT4

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:25:05 UTC No. 16263132

>>16263120
The only way he talks about Musk again is if the ift5 tower catch goes catastrophically wrong, and I doubt he'll livestream it. I think Musk even talked about him recently, something like
>yeah lots of armchair rocket scientists online, many of them academics. And if you look at what they've actually accomplished it's uh, not much

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:35:33 UTC No. 16263148

>>16263132
>And if you look at what they've actually accomplished it's uh, not much
Besides the multitude of published research papers and one of the most successful Youtube channels of all time. Lol

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:42:15 UTC No. 16263161

>>16263148
Wow cool. Does he live in a multi million mansion? Can he take a trip on his 300 m triple storey yacht? Can he fuck 10/10 girls in the ass in a hot tub that can fit multiple sailboats?

I don't like musk at all but I wouldn't care about a semi tranny making Videos on YouTube if I were him.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:49:06 UTC No. 16263172

>>16263161
By those heavily materialistic standards, >99% of humans are unaccomplished losers. Thunderf00t is an accomplished scientist and content creator.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:50:26 UTC No. 16263178

>>16263161
Musk a freaking stupid hypocrite

https://www.hydrogenfuelnews.com/elon-musk-hydrogen-fuel-cells/8552516/

https://phys.org/news/2021-10-mars-colony-hydrogen-factory-propellant.html#:~:text=One%20particular%20location%20in%20the%20solar%20system%20does,on%20the%20red%20planet%20is%20in%20water%20form.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 20:18:35 UTC No. 16263228

>>16263148
>he has got a big YouTube channel dude.

I mean Elon is actually building rockets and taking risk. It’s easy to sit on the Internet and criticize when you’re not actually The one taking risks.

It’s like sports somebody criticize the football player, but yet they don’t have the athleticism to play football.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 20:22:41 UTC No. 16263232

>>16263161
What color is your butthole?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 20:23:28 UTC No. 16263233

>>16263228
Starship isn't going to get close to achieving its goals. He is contributing to the privatization of the space industry which is a bad thing.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 20:44:33 UTC No. 16263259

>>16263233
>Whaaaaa, 1 ship doesn’t work.

Elon Chad musk

I have the most successful electric car company

I have the largest constellation of satellites with star link.

Cope and seethe faggot

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 20:48:47 UTC No. 16263264

>>16263172
any man who paints his nails is a pathetic loser

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 21:20:37 UTC No. 16263317

>>16263178
The energy density of hydrogen fuel cells for vehicles is really bad. Hydrogen as a component of methane for a methalox rocket engine is going to be important on Mars. The fact that you see any similarities whatsoever between the articles you posted means you understand neither
>>16263148
>le published papers
>le youtube channel

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 21:23:48 UTC No. 16263324

>>16263233
>privatization of the space industry which is a bad thing.
With this statement you've proven yourself to be completely ignorant not only on rocketry and space flight, but also free market vs government capabilities. The Falcon 9 is probably the greatest rocket to ever have flown, and starship is set to take that title if things keep progressing. You will seeth when it happens so I'm not even going to bother finishing this post

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 21:34:32 UTC No. 16263352

>>16263233
>He is contributing to the privatization of the space industry which is a bad thing
I normally despise privatization but this is one of those cases where it actually serves the benefit of humanity. In less than two decades SpaceX has advanced rocketry more than any government space agency in the last 40 years.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 21:39:56 UTC No. 16263363

>>16263352
>In less than two decades SpaceX has advanced rocketry more than any government space agency in the last 40 years.
LOL

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 22:22:32 UTC No. 16263416

>>16263172
>accomplished scientist
Even /sci/ has a published paper. LLMs have dozens of known published paper and probably thousands of uncredited ones by now. Published papers are regularly found to be fraudulent or wildly incorrect when someone actually bothers to do a real review on them. Bragging that someone has a published paper is like bragging a negotiator got a free can of green beans as part of a "Buy One, Get One Free" deal at the supermarket.
You're going to have to get into more details of what he has accomplished as a scientist other that published some papers.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 23:50:37 UTC No. 16263523

>>16263000
>Debunked Falcon 9..... oh wait maybe let's just forget about that one