Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:13:33 UTC No. 16263116

a m****, a n*****, and a k***
This stuff rots your brain

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:14:13 UTC No. 16263117

>>16263113
Joe Rogan is a moron. Eric Weinstein pseud. Terrence Howard is a retard. Thought? I hate them all. What a waste of time and youtube storage space.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:22:03 UTC No. 16263126

>>16263113
I'm extremely disappointed to find out that Joe's concept of a smart person is someone who says lots of words he doesn't know in a row. No wonder he can't tell the difference between a real physicist and Terrance Howard. For him, listening to them is the exact same experience.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:22:09 UTC No. 16263127

>>16263113
I can't believe there are still people watching this shit. All "scientists" on this show are quacks, Weinstein especially. He's been exposed already.

🗑️ 23, pseudo neet at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:23:00 UTC No. 16263128

>>16263116
>a m****
huh? manlet?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:36:35 UTC No. 16263149

>>16263113
So all the threads in the past six months or so about dividing by zero, 1*1=2, square root of 2, infinity and much more were all because of this Terrence guy? I'm completely stunned. None of these threads referred to this guy even once. No way you knew all along. What a psyop. The trolls have won. There's no going back from this. Wow.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:39:18 UTC No. 16263154

>>16263113
Eric Weinstein's reading list: http://theportal.wiki/wiki/Read

Is it good or a meme?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:46:19 UTC No. 16263167

>>16263149
Yeah terrence did another joe rogan episode a month ago that went viral

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:59:09 UTC No. 16263198

>>16263116
*a bald manlet
ftfy

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 20:04:16 UTC No. 16263205

>>16263198
A fag faggy fagerino fahafifaggot

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 20:27:48 UTC No. 16263242

>>16263113
Eric Weinstein is an autist, Terrence Howard is a schizo, both are delusional narcissists.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 20:48:05 UTC No. 16263262

This is what getting divorced 4 times does to a man. And Eric being the clouthungry grifter that he is had to go there with kid gloves.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 23:17:35 UTC No. 16263481

>>16263113
is terrence colour blind?

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 23:44:05 UTC No. 16263516

>>16263242
Eric sounds just as schizophrenic as Terrence. For hours, they're both playing with toys and at one point Eric starts playing a harmonica.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 23:47:38 UTC No. 16263519

>>16263516
they have both written flawed papers promising to overturn mainstream academia with basic mathematical fallacies

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 23:52:34 UTC No. 16263528

>>16263519
and both have a tendency to ramble about metaphors, obscure scientists, and why academia is not open enough. Eric gets mad at Terrence for patenting his ideas, but Eric was famously ridiculed for copyrighting his own theory of everything.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 23:56:08 UTC No. 16263530

>>16263116
racism is the biggest sign of poor education and lack of world experience. Get your life together loser stop trying to impress your little reddit buddies by being edgy. You're a grown adult man

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:07:12 UTC No. 16263550

theyre both half right

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:09:11 UTC No. 16263552

>>16263550
the issue isn't what they are saying, it's them not explaining what any of it actually means. It's one thing to just say you figured out how something works or a neat thing something does, but what does it mean what is Terrence's end goal?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:10:09 UTC No. 16263554

>>16263116
This isn't reddit you nigger-faggot

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:21:02 UTC No. 16263564

>>16263552
terrence just 1 doesnt understand what multiplication IS and 2 is trying very hard to get to alchemy without knowing anything about alchemy while using scientific jargon that he understands even less.
he is right that there are no NATURALLY FORMING straight lines, however. lines are a human invention.
where i think eric fucked up (and terrence too to a certain extent) is that the focus of the entire conversation shouldve been on how special relativity is retarded and relies a lot on things we dont have any hard evidence for, we just think they should exist if we follow einsteinian math.
you can prove anything with math if you try hard enough. that doesnt mean its real.
heres part one of a series of videos that explains what terrence is saying much better than what hes capable of.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzadkHXIUOs
its not some crazy new theory. if anything its babylonian.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:27:48 UTC No. 16263569

>>16263564
i should add, addition doesnt exist in nature either. only multiplication.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:30:52 UTC No. 16263572

have never seen so many schizos all in 1 thread like this before

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:41:45 UTC No. 16263578

>>16263564
i agree with this ANON fag here. Mathematics is just a tool of reference for humans. there is no such thing as math and the universe does not operate on it.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:43:30 UTC No. 16263580

When I was growing up I would often come to fantastic conclusions about the world, get super excited, then learn that we've actually known it for 500 years. At some point I just stopped trying.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:52:21 UTC No. 16263582

the biggest problem with terrence is his sheer hubris to think hes the first person to extrapolate sacred geometry into 3d

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:52:56 UTC No. 16263584

I would like to take this opportunity to post my pseudo-paper once again, on formalizing Howard's paper. I've been intermittently posting it here for the past month and a half.

It isn't legitimizing it but rather taking all of his arguments to their logical endpoints. It is currently unfinished and I'm lazy with working on it but I have 6 pages so far lol. Feel free to rip it apart or disregard it, it's just fun to me

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 01:03:04 UTC No. 16263590

>>16263580
most dumbass post ever

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 01:05:53 UTC No. 16263592

>>16263590

I suspect everyone goes through that at some point when they're a little kid

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 01:37:36 UTC No. 16263617

>>16263592
don't ever type to me again

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 01:41:10 UTC No. 16263623

>>16263584
is this
"[2] Anonymous (2024) >>16224644, 4chan /sci/."
the proper citation format for a 4chan post? Someone get IEEE on the line lol

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 01:43:36 UTC No. 16263625

They just need Ben Shapiro and they can be called the four horsemen

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 02:09:17 UTC No. 16263644

>>16263584
Oh yea I remember your paper you cited me in it too fag. Why don’t you just send it to Terrence Howard

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 02:28:36 UTC No. 16263650

>>16263644
Literally how lol. Also I'm scared he's going to do some dumbass callout post against me and people will find me. I am paranoid.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 02:29:37 UTC No. 16263651

>>16263623
Not sure but I cited two Anons that way. How would it be properly cited?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 03:22:28 UTC No. 16263695

>>16263530
Counter point, the more worldly I become, the more I hate blacks and jews.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 03:28:58 UTC No. 16263703

>>16263617
Did you not have a solipsism phase in kindergarten?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:29:17 UTC No. 16263777

>>16263113
He mentions Wildberger at 25 minutes

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:48:07 UTC No. 16263802

>>16263154
Not bad

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:49:18 UTC No. 16263803

>>16263651
No the citation is fine. You may want to link to the archived post though (e.g. warosu or achived.moe)

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:53:24 UTC No. 16263805

>>16263650
>how
Send it to Weinstein and have him send it to Terrence

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 04:57:02 UTC No. 16263813

>>16263651
It's not that. Your citations are too recent. You'll need a few older 4chan posts so it's more believable

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:26:37 UTC No. 16263858

>>16263584
add me to the citations

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:28:37 UTC No. 16263860

>>16263584
This is retarded. Read Serge Lang's Algebra and properly formalize it. Your extrnsion to the real numbers is nonsense

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:32:25 UTC No. 16263864

>>16263584
You misunderstood him. Watch https://youtu.be/scOiixjrupE?si=PQ2ZgT490wq-aeI-

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:02:03 UTC No. 16263900

>>16263113

This is unuronically how department heads treat undergraduates.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 06:35:18 UTC No. 16263934

>>16263580
>come to a great epiphany
>Kant beat me too it

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:50:56 UTC No. 16264012

>>16263116
midge

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:18:56 UTC No. 16264156

Weinstein's condescension is off the chart
I root for schizo Wakanda science Terrence

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:28:03 UTC No. 16264160

>>16263584
this nigga cited 4chan in his paper

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:49:58 UTC No. 16264172

>>16263580
I feel you, brother. Many ideas for inventions I had when I was a little were either currently existant or realized a few years later (Most of them inconsequential, of course). But I haven't given up. Neither should you, these "new ideas" are proof of your intellectual talent.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:51:24 UTC No. 16264173

>>16263584
Actually more based than most pseuds dunking on him

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 16:39:56 UTC No. 16264483

>>16263858
Lol ok where do you want it
>>16263860
I'll read it sure, I only really have an undergraduate understanding of math anyways
>>16263864
Man I'm still going through his paper, I'm not sure I can handle a video of him spouting more bullshit
>>16264160
And I'll cite you too anon
>>16264173
Thank you lol

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 18:50:11 UTC No. 16264694

>>16263126
King Terry spoke on this phenomenon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0qmkQGqpM8

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 18:55:32 UTC No. 16264701

>>16263154
> Landau & Lifschitz
Into the trash it goes.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 18:58:19 UTC No. 16264705

>>16263126
i'm laughing at the idea of a guy listening to more than five minutes of joe rogan and believing for a second longer that it could be any different.

he's not some deep thinker. he's not even that interesting. he's just a wall. nutty, successful, and often narcissistic people have enjoyed bouncing their own voices off of him to an audience of guys who are similarly uncomplicated.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:04:38 UTC No. 16264717

>>16263126
It's not disappointing, it's the default. Think of all the people on this board praising Witten, Mochizuki, Scholze and other supposedly great mathematicians/physicists whose work they haven't even tried to read. The more inaccessible something is to the pseud the more smart they think it is.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:17:56 UTC No. 16264761

>>16264694
I disagree on the count that Terry conflates complexity with comprehensibility. With no universal standard for what's "simple" or what's "complex", this take quickly falls apart.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:20:08 UTC No. 16264773

>>16264761
>With no universal standard for what's "simple" or what's "complex", this take quickly falls apart.
Why do you say there isn't a universal standard? There are obviously many such universal standards possible. For example, how many pages of textbooks does it take to explain the subject to a smart high schooler.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:20:22 UTC No. 16264775

>>16264717
i feel like most of the witten, mochizuki, scholze, etc. fans are doing it for the bit though

mochizuki is a schizo weirdo with scholze doing damage control and string theory is a joke.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:21:38 UTC No. 16264777

>>16264773
>There are obviously many such universal standards possible. For example [insert vague, incredibly unscientific "standard"]

kek

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:23:04 UTC No. 16264778

>>16264775
What about all the people who constantly sing praises to Landau books, when they've clearly never actually carefully went through them, because if they did they would realize how bad
and nonsensical they are?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:25:25 UTC No. 16264785

>>16264778
yeah, i can't explain that one. /sci/'s filled with silly guys ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 19:46:10 UTC No. 16264817

>>16264701
>>16264778
calm down schizo

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 20:07:45 UTC No. 16264849

>>16264817
Have you read carefully read L&L and disagree with me?
>inb4 no response

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 20:29:26 UTC No. 16264894

>>16263530
>racism is the biggest sign of poor education and lack of world experience
We know, it's already been established that blacks are some of the most racist beings on the planet

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 20:46:39 UTC No. 16264911

>>16264701
>>16264778
>>16264849
Filtered.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 21:10:32 UTC No. 16264953

>>16264911
(You)

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 21:31:58 UTC No. 16264983

>name drops wildberger
based. wildberger on rogan when?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 23:09:36 UTC No. 16265108

>>16263113
this was just eric feat. terrence and joe

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 23:15:43 UTC No. 16265123

>>16263584
i had no idea you could attach a pdf on this site

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 23:17:20 UTC No. 16265125

>>16265108
did eric end up losing his patience and bash terrance's head into the desk?

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 23:49:44 UTC No. 16265168

>>16263113
>>16263530
which one of them is the scientist?

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 00:09:25 UTC No. 16265181

Howard completely obliberiated that big schnozer jude weinstein

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 00:30:45 UTC No. 16265192

>>16263113
>link to a video streaming website thread
>/sci/ - Science & Math

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 00:33:44 UTC No. 16265194

>>16265125
no but eric tells terrence his theories are horseshit and scientifically offensive to his face and that he's obviously self-taught because he mispronounces things. at one point eric puts an equation on the screen and asks terrence to explain it (he couldn't). whenever terrence said something eric spewed a bunch of phd tier math no one else in the room could understand. eric's response to terrence is basically the same as neil degrasse tyson's—"you're wrong but your shapes look cool"

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 00:35:02 UTC No. 16265197

>>16265192
>no fun allowed

/sci/ isn't real

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 03:37:32 UTC No. 16265358

>>16264483
https://theportal.group/th
what im really angry he didn't mention, is that terry's root thing is because n^(1/m))^(m+1)=n*(n^(1/m)) for reason i hope are fairly obvious to you, both in how exp works and from how roots work multiplicatively, honestly eric went at it from a really high level view of howards "root loop" thing

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 04:38:48 UTC No. 16265437

>>16263116
>m****
What

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:10:48 UTC No. 16266139

>>16264849
>Have you read carefully read L&L and disagree with me?
Learn to speak English first. No wonder you have trouble understanding Landau

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:13:34 UTC No. 16266143

>>16264701
Why not join Weinstein' discord and debate it with him? Oh right, because you're a coward

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:37:54 UTC No. 16266163

>>16263113
It's a proof we're living in Idiocracy. The schizophrenic nigger entertainer having an episode with numerological delusions, the harvard phd turned social media grifter taking him up on it and dropping terminology to stun the mouthbreathers, all on the most succesful podcast on earth, headed by a drug-addled moron... we need a Great Flood real bad.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:39:09 UTC No. 16266164

>>16266163
the entertainment industry is the heart of democracy

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:48:44 UTC No. 16266172

>>16263569
> if i have this lake of water and i add to it some rain, i have more water

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:18:23 UTC No. 16266237

>>16266143
Because he's repeatedly proven himself to be a mathematically incompetent delusional buffoon. I won't waste my time debating someone like him.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:25:58 UTC No. 16266248

Things about this podcast that nobody mentions
>it's clear to see Weinstein is pretty damn smart, great references: Stanley Jordan - prodigy jazz guitarist, this math professor at Harvard that beat Weinstein both in music and math, this story showed that Eric isn't just some delusional egomaniac
>Terrence Howard is still clowning around but much more humble than before
>some bizarre stuff that nobody mentions and questions - Eric claims string theorists are stalking him and his family (wtf), Howard apparently helped some academics with growing diamons (wtf x2), it's never brought up again
>Weinstein cocksucking Howard for some strange reason - your mind is like ferrari etc. wtf, he's not smart, he looks clueless most of the time

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:15:13 UTC No. 16266405

>>16266237
so I am right about you, got it

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:16:46 UTC No. 16266408

>>16266248
there's also the bit where howard mentions wildberger. Literally the last person I'd have thought to know of him

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:19:47 UTC No. 16266415

>>16266248
Weinstein graduated from Harvard. He wants to claw them back to prestige, as they are woke and outputting a bunch of shit.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:57:29 UTC No. 16266488

>>16265168
not any one

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:02:40 UTC No. 16266615

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 23:25:17 UTC No. 16266854

>>16266615
This point from Eric was kind of stupid

https://books.google.com/books?id=VZ1axrolCpkC&pg=PA220#v=onepage&q&f=false

>The antecedents of prepublication editorial peer review appear to date from the middle of the seventeenth century, with the publication of the journal Philosophical Transactions

They didn't use the exact phrase "peer review" but it still existed as a concept

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 23:38:22 UTC No. 16266876

>>16263695
are you jelly about larger penus and brain?

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 00:09:57 UTC No. 16266904

>>16266408
>these are the wildberger posters

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 00:58:08 UTC No. 16266961

>>16266408
no way. can anyone link?

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 02:05:30 UTC No. 16267014

>>16263530
>t. never left the resort

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 02:07:19 UTC No. 16267016

>>16263564
That pic looks like some schizo garbage that I would never read. Granted I too have a lot of pages of notes like that

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 03:36:58 UTC No. 16267127

Yeah I have a model of that in my paper

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 04:04:23 UTC No. 16267176

>>16266248
It was actually a very good podcast

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:18:59 UTC No. 16267408

>>16267176
What was the point of using the word isomorphic in explaining that 1 times 1 is 1?
Was it because if he showed the obvious that taking one apple one time gives you one apple, then it would be obvious that nigger is dumb as cunt?

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:21:13 UTC No. 16267412

>>16265437
moron

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:25:02 UTC No. 16267414

>>16266164
This is the reality and why hollywood glorifies democracy as a god thing, when it's just indoctrination to do what the media tells you to do.

democracy is just mob rule but who controls the mob?

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:40:52 UTC No. 16267420

>>16267414
who?

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 10:07:45 UTC No. 16267433

Thanks to this podcast I came across another podcast discussing this talk and it's actually more interesting, this old physics professor guy that talks here is based
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8ora-508Z8

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 10:22:40 UTC No. 16267439

I really hate how Weinstein talked him down

I watched the full 4 hours and I thought I'd get some insight, but instead I got Weinstein saying stuff like

"Don't piss off my community", "you don't know who you are messing with" "you need to get beaten up badly", and all that mafia talk

He was playing good cop bad cop for the (((scientific))) community but acted gatekeepy as hell

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 10:45:46 UTC No. 16267455

>>16267433
man I like AlienScientist but I'm a few minutes in and all I hear is that sefaradi (Jack sarfati) sperging out uncontrollably against terrence howard
I know terrence howard is a schizo retard but so far the only things those counter videos are showing is that howard might be into something

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:11:42 UTC No. 16267471

controlled opposition gatekeepers arguing with eash other on a limited hangout talk show

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:32:38 UTC No. 16267527

>>16267439
Maybe he thought that's the language you need to use with a negro

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:48:40 UTC No. 16267543

Terrence is so charismatic. His voice is so soft and soothing, I can listen to him talk about crystal shape for hours. He is also right about saying that Zero is not equal to nothing.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:23:58 UTC No. 16267573

I'm too stupid to understand why
>1 x 1 = 2
someone explain this. And why
>2 x (1 x 1)
isn't 4.
Thanks!

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:54:30 UTC No. 16267595

>>16267543
>Zero is not equal to nothing
how so? other than one is the connotatus and the other is denotatus (as letter A and sound a are not exactly the same thing, but that's mostly sophistry)
It's as if to say "you are not John, John is not you, but only your name" something along those lines.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:55:34 UTC No. 16267596

>>16267573
> a couple of homosexual kikes are using a homosexual nigger to further destroy the fundamentals of the civilization
move along, nothing to see here

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 14:05:15 UTC No. 16267606

>>16267595
You can multiply something with 0 but you cannot divide something with 0. For 0 to equal to nothing, it has to have the power to multiply and divide numbers simultaneously and equally.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 14:11:16 UTC No. 16267614

>>16263519
He should write out Terrence's proof on the board: https://x.com/terrencehoward/status/925754491881877507/photo/

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 14:27:56 UTC No. 16267629

>>16267573
>someone explain this. And why
>>2 x (1 x 1)
>isn't 4.
Simple
2 x (1 x 1) = (1 x 1) x (1 x 1)
(1 x 1) x (1 x 1) = (1 x 1) x (1 x 1) x (1 x 1) x (1 x 1) = 8

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 14:32:42 UTC No. 16267634

>>16267573
>someone explain this. And why
>2 x (1 x 1)
>isn't 4.
Simple
2 x (1 x 1) = (1 x 1) x (1 x 1)
(1 x 1) x (1 x 1) = (1 x 1) x (1 x 1) x (1 x 1) x (1 x 1) =16

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 14:36:19 UTC No. 16267638

>>16267606
>you cannot divide something with 0
You can take something zero times, but can you divide something into 0 parts?
> For 0 to equal to nothing, it has to have the power to multiply and divide numbers simultaneously and equally.
Can you divide something into nothing? I guess you cannot, and thus zero and nothing are not that different in this one.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 15:33:06 UTC No. 16267693

>>16267455
But all in all interesting talk, Sarfati claims he's working on warp drive and been involved with government projects on UFOs. He seems to be a mix between Bob Lazar and Eric Weinstein to me lol. Btw he also said in this video that Weinstein is afraid to have an online debate with him. Also his way of speaking and calling everybody "schmucks" remind me of Larry David lol.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:48:18 UTC No. 16267780

>>16267634
Bless you sir.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 17:23:49 UTC No. 16267819

>it's another episode of mathlets getting tripped over by field axioms

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 18:06:07 UTC No. 16267868

>>16263113
I can't believe Terrence mentioned Wildberger lmao (25:15).

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 20:05:06 UTC No. 16268023

>>16267439
I agree, eric is autistic and self-important and loves his own voice. He never even let terrence get a sentence in to explain himself. It was so cringey watching him act like science is a mafia and he's a badass intellectual renegade fighting a war against the academic establishment. Eric also constantly bashes terrence for 'teaching' yet eric runs his mouth for 3/4 of the 4 hours to teach things himself. It's obvious the podcast is just a medium for these two to boast. Eric bashes neil degrasse tyson for dismissing terrence yet eric is doing the exact same thing by saying "you're undisciplined and need to study more before your theory can be reviewed". Eric fully knows terrence is a black guru moron who can't be convinced he's wrong; it's a sneaky way of avoiding engagement with terrence and his work.

I was surprised at how well terrence took the criticism considering his ego and long record of assaulting people. Dude has 4 ex-wives for a reason. He's just a piece of shit

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 20:42:36 UTC No. 16268067

>>16268023
Would diagnose him and Bret with level 4 schizophrenia too for sure. Believe there's a very valuable to civilization set of genes that certain groups of people have in spades that tethers IQ and schizophrenia and helps produce mathematicians and philosophers with mystic inclinations. Eric and Bret both have paranoid leanings as well. Probably very high risk scores for schizophrenia but some genes that help prevent full psychosis. Eric and Bret are potentially very valuable to civilization. *I'm* potentially very valuable to civilization.

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 20:55:58 UTC No. 16268078

Listened to most of this didn't watch. Anyone else pick up on over the top don't know the term for it suggestion-persuasion techniques Eric was using? There were hard prhases that stuck out when he was talking to Terrance, like GIVE UP and PLANT A CHIP IN YOUR BRAIN and that were tucked into friendlier conversation. Think he was kindly attempting to tell him that he's schizophrenic and this is just a way to preach for his pet project of funding non-academic physics research. Just very noticeable due to Eric's autism.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 21:22:13 UTC No. 16268102

>>16268067
eric isn't valuable to civilisation he's a failed academic turned social media contrarian grifter. His schtick is to go podcasts and talks to berate and start drama with noteworthy physicists to make it seem to laymen that he's on the same level as famous physicists. He's famous for hating string theory but at one point in the episode he also reveals he's skeptical about vaccines and natural selection too. He's just a contrarian for the sake of being contrarian and to make it seem he's smarter than academia

Bret is like this too. There's something in the family that makes them attention-seeking and anti-authoritarian. I don't think either eric or terrence have schizophrenia, they're just huge narcissists but at least eric is actually smart

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 21:42:31 UTC No. 16268127

>>16268102
>he's skeptical about vaccines
and you're not, because...

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 22:12:53 UTC No. 16268155

>>16268102
>don't think either eric or terrence have schizophrenia
Too flexible a term probably, but Bret and Eric and Terrance have at least traces of whatever qualifies for sure. My understanding is it involves a large number of genes and when you reach a certain point in your inheritance of those genes you become snappable by environmental stressors. European Jews have higher schizo rates than average off the bat (Einstein btw had a schizophrenic son and family members). If you don't snap completely at high risk, you might still be extra inclined, especially with a high IQ coupling, to search for hidden meanings and secret plots and that kind of thing, maybe find metacognitive tasks easier etc and get drawn to certain topics and fields. Terrance I feel is 1-2 grades higher in schizophrenia and is probably diagnosable. Probably actually high IQ too but not quite high enough to dodge white coats if they gun for him. The other 2 might not be diagnosable but I'd bet 1000 dollars if you DNA tested them they'd be in top 5-10% risk category for developing psychosis. Eric loves hidden plots and the way he mentioned his stalker was interesting. Bret I think is more obviously paranoid. My qualifications being, not to brag or anything, I'm at *very* high risk for developing schizophrenia

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 00:37:34 UTC No. 16268284

>>16267868
TH confirmed lurker

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 17:28:39 UTC No. 16269197

>>16268102
both Eric and Bret seem pretty smart desu. And Bret is the less contrarian one

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 17:30:18 UTC No. 16269200

>>16268155
>the way he mentioned his stalker was interesting.
do you have the timestamp?

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 17:40:06 UTC No. 16269212

>>16268155
>I'm at *very* high risk for developing schizophrenia
How do you know?