Image not available

1080x1497

Bw6.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16263432

37% life expectancy reduction for people who took the covid vax

Anonymous No. 16263453

>>16263432
Any control for age?

Anonymous No. 16263460

>>16263453
Of course, that would require antivaxxers being honest

Anonymous No. 16263475

Must be the clots, the worms, the aids, the erectile dysfunction, reduced IQ, lowered lung capacity, nanomachines, brain fog, 5G spirits, sterilization agent, DNA splicing gene therapy, and spike protein generation, and I forgot what else.
Really saps the life out of you when your body has to do all these extra things after receiving some shots. Crazy how the fit all that in there.

Anonymous No. 16263488

>>16263432
I absolutely love these threads because paid shitlib shills stalk all the blue boards and they have to see all this shit.

Anonymous No. 16263506

>>16263475
maybe it just damages your immune system
https://odysee.com/@Realfake_Newsource:9/RFNS-12.23-001-009:7

Anonymous No. 16263508

>>16263475
So true! Adverse effects from a medical procedure? Impossible and totally unheard of!

I’m doing my 2nd round of recreational chemotherapy as we speak!

Anonymous No. 16263610

>>16263475
Surveillance via microchipping
Magnetizes the body
Mercury poisoning
Aluminum poisoning
Toxins poison breastmilk
Causes 'sudden death'
Causes anaphylaxis
Causes intussusception
Causes colonic lesions
Causes nerve damage and paralysis
Causes multiple sclerosis
Causes narcolepsy
"The death toll from the COVID-19 vaccine is greater than every vaccine in the last 20 years combined"
"My baby is hypersensitive"
"Vaccines are GMO's"
Bill Gates wants to depopulate the Earth with vaccines
Polio is actually caused by DDT
Is Haram
Natural immunity is better

I can't think of any more.

Anonymous No. 16263615

>>16263432
>270,227,181 people in the US got the vax
>somehow our population hasn't dropped by 30+%
Do people even think this schizo shit through?

Anonymous No. 16263624

>>16263615
That's not what that says.

Anonymous No. 16263627

>>16263610
You're forgetting jakob creutzfeldt and heart damage

Anonymous No. 16263635

>>16263610
You want to really piss off this board?
Let them know that they haven't even classified all the types of rna, let alone know what they do, or how they do it.
In fact, they haven't even fully specified cholesterol.
This is the saving grace of their death shot: it is on record before they had the power to destroy all of humanity.
Thanks jabbies. You have ensured our future for a krispy kreme donut. I shall think of you fondly every Sunday morning while me and the boys at church eat donuts.

Anonymous No. 16263653

>>16263610
you are a midwit

smart people wouldn't take it because
a) there is a chance it didn't work and
b) a chance it is dangerous in the long term which could not be tested and
c) what's the point of taking it if everyone else is?

dumb people wouldn't take it because they thought it would magnetise them

Anonymous No. 16263659

>>16263432
I'm figuring people with existing health problems took the vax at a higher rate because they were more concerned with Covid

Vax probably responsible for part of that though and who knows what it will cause in the future.

Anonymous No. 16263694

if you got vaxxed and died your genes just weren't worth preserving. this was all a eugenics program.

Anonymous No. 16263697

>>16263653
This, covid wasn’t even dangerous for non-geriatrics so why even take a risk with some RNA concoction?

Image not available

1024x839

ben garrison pwnz....jpg

Anonymous No. 16263965

>>16263653
>dumb people wouldn't take it because they thought it would magnetise them

Anonymous No. 16263967

>>16263432
When he marks the entire text yellow he should use a different color for the important parts

Anonymous No. 16263974

it is fascinating how inept humans are at modeling complex risks in their mind

Anonymous No. 16263988

>>16263694
Why would you think that they only gave the vax to childless people?

Anonymous No. 16264116

>For those vaccinated with two doses, the loss of life expectancy in 739 days is 1.37 times that of the unvaccinated.
Calculate this over, let's say, an expected life expectancy of 75 years to arrive at roughly 55. Is this extrapolation going to hold true? Probably not because adverse side effects usually kick in earlier than later.
>>16263615
>Do people even think this schizo shit through?
Let's say some agent has been introduced to your environment that causes mortality to increase by 10 %. This increase would be barely noticeable for the average person because it deviates little from the baseline.
Yet, such an increase would mean that nearly 1 out of 10 deaths can be attributed to the newly introduced agent. As far as I know, mortality rates were still 10 - 15 % above normal in 2023 relative to the baseline before 2020. Whether or not this is due to the virus, stress, the vaccine, I can't tell. But it figures that the vaccine could cause a relatively high number of

Anonymous No. 16264118

>>16263432
>gone from suddenly dead in two weeks to 37% life expectancy reduction
that dude getting hundreds of shots really broke their minds

Anonymous No. 16264119

>>16263635
>while me and the boys at church
while the boys and I

Anonymous No. 16264134

>>16263615
most literate /sci/ user

Anonymous No. 16264135

>>16264116
>Whether or not this is due to the virus, stress, the vaccine, I can't tell. But it figures that the vaccine could cause a relatively high number of

It's got to be a combination of factors
>direct vaccine deaths
>indirect vaccine deaths from long term injury
>direct covid deaths
>indirect covid deaths from long term injury
>delayed treatment from lockdowns
>sedentary lifestyle from retirement/working from home
>fentanyl epidemic (I myself found a dead guy with a crack pipe in his hand who was dead in his car)
>overeating/overdrinking during the lockdowns and after
>aged population
>social isolation

Image not available

505x572

nobrain.png

Anonymous No. 16264192

>>16263460
>>16263508
>>16263610
>>16263615
>>16263659
>>16264118
>>16264134

Image not available

456x680

A.Bourta.jpg

Anonymous No. 16265023

Anonymous No. 16265034

>>16263432
>work out a lot
>eat a lot of zinc
>wear N100 respirators when around people indoors

respiratory viruses are not that hard to beat if you actually try

Anonymous No. 16265054

>>16264135
>>16264116
Seems like vaccines didnt help if the control unvaxxed people live longer and are happier.

LMAO

Anonymous No. 16265061

>>16265034
>wear N100 respirators when around people indoors
I still wear a regular cloth mask around people when shopping and haven't had a cold/flu in 2.5 years. Normally (before covid) I'd be sick around 5/6 times a year. I also clean the inside of my nose with water and paper towel when I get home.

Anonymous No. 16265070

>>16265061
I still got a mild case of COVID wearing an N95, that's when I upgraded to N100s. No cold/flu/RSV/covid in 3 years since.

Image not available

2400x2400

0AAkwPN.jpg

Anonymous No. 16265373

New Peer-Reviewed Study : A Critical Analysis of All-Cause Deaths during COVID-19 Vaccination in an Italian Province - Alessandria et al,

Published Date : 30 June 2024

Findings :
>"All cause death risks to be higher for those vaccinated with one and two doses compared to the unvaccinated"

>"Subjects vaccinated with two doses lost 37% of life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population"

>"The booster doses were ineffective"

>"We should admit that vaccination increases the risk of death for causes other than Covid-19, or by direct damage (adverse effects) or by indirect damage, e.g : to immune system"

Anonymous No. 16266283

>>16263432
>37% life expectancy reduction for people who took the covid vax
not enough for my tastes, how do we get it up to 100%

Anonymous No. 16266302

>>16264135
It is a combination, as the lockdown themselves were hugely detrimental to well-being
Still, you should not underestimate the impact of events even if they only affect a small percentage of people at any given moment. An increase in the baseline of death rates by 10 % doesn't sound like it's a lot, but this small increase percentage-wise already implies a reduction of someone's average (or expected) life expectancy by 7 to 8 years.

We're currently at a point where post-industrialization has led to an over-abundance of products. Hence, why we can assort a lot of resources and people to the elderly. This is going to stop at the precise moment the model, which until then been used to funnel money to stakeholders, becomes obsolete or can't be supported anymore.

Anonymous No. 16266309

Can you just make a general for these trash threads? There are about six fucking threads on this crap already.

Image not available

594x690

clucking chicken.png

Anonymous No. 16266317

>>16266309
I can tell that you're experiencing emotional distress by your use of profanity "for emphasis".
Pic is what you look like btw

Anonymous No. 16266319

It will only get worst from here and you people proved scientifically to be bad at politica

Anonymous No. 16267190

>>16266317
They only get so upset at threads about the covid vaccine because they regret having gotten vaccinated.

Anonymous No. 16268101

>>16263432
>only 37%
pfizer bros…

Anonymous No. 16269371

>>16268101
37% so far

Image not available

768x1262

clotadamsspeaks.png

Anonymous No. 16269516

>>16263965

Anonymous No. 16270686

>>16263965
why is dogbert in an ice cube full of mosquitoes?

Image not available

1009x1079

758.jpg

Anonymous No. 16271527

>>16263460