Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:47:03 UTC No. 16264409

Aliens are very far away and stuck in their home solar systems, same as we are.
It's impossible to do interstellar travel at speeds that would make the trip worth it.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:47:55 UTC No. 16264411

>>16263709
all around us but not visible to us

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:49:25 UTC No. 16264412

>>16263709
In >>>/x/

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:52:41 UTC No. 16264418

>>16264412
Asking why we don't see evidence of aliens is a valid /sci/ question/topic.
A claim like
>I've encountered aliens and I know _____ about them
Would be a /x/ thing

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:52:41 UTC No. 16264419

>>16263709
Don't exist because this is a simulation.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:54:14 UTC No. 16264420

>>16264409
I'm pretty sure going 90% speed of light is easy we are just incredibly primitive can't manufacture antimatter in significant quantities.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 15:59:16 UTC No. 16264426

>>16264420
Energy sources or propulsion systems aside, the problem is that space would need to be completely and perfectly empty to be safe to traverse at relativistic speeds. It's not perfectly empty.
A spacecraft traveling at just 10% the speed of light would be heavily damaged or destroyed if it hits a speck of dust along the way.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 16:01:12 UTC No. 16264428

>>16264418
Asking about aliens every 2 days on /sci/ with the same picture and exactly same text every time is definitely >>>/x/

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 16:03:20 UTC No. 16264430

>>16264428
Uptight /sci/ jannies don't delete the threads or ban the poster. They tacitly approve of this.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 23:06:38 UTC No. 16265099

We are the aliens

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 23:27:50 UTC No. 16265145

>>16263709
ever heard about the jews?

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:27:22 UTC No. 16265919

>>16263709
South America, they like to terrorize villages and skin people alive. Colares flap, Guarapiranga Resevoir, Pela caras, the more recent attacks in Peru, and more.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:31:48 UTC No. 16265921

>>16263709
They should literally be everywhere. My only explanation is that our reality is a simulation with a simulated universe where life only exists on one planet, ours.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:10:11 UTC No. 16265965

>>16265921
Retard, do you understand how unlikely it is for a planet to harbor the conditions for intelligent life, let alone basic microbial life, to be possible? Do you also understand how vastly empty space is and how far away the nearest star system is, let alone one with life in it? Of course you don't, because you're a schizophrenic Christcuck with cognitive dissonance. You are literally a monkey brain. You haven't evolved.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:28:21 UTC No. 16265987

Aliens probably heard our radio transmissions 50 years ago and are on the way to fuck us up

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:41:14 UTC No. 16266004

>>16265965
Yes it's unlikely for a planet to harbor conditions of intelligent life. Now do the math
>the Milky Way contains between 100 billion and 400 billion stars and, on average, each star of the Milky Way hosts one planet.

100 billion planets. 100. fucking. billion. Minimum. Only in our galaxy.

>Our galaxy is in a Local Group containing 54 galaxies. This Local Group of 54 galaxies is part of a whole, the Virgo supercluster, made up of 100 other Local Groups. And there are 10 million superclusters in the observable universe.

They should be everywhere.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:19:12 UTC No. 16266058

alien infatuation is the famous judeo narcissism: people exposed to judaism deeply believe they are snowflakes in the universe and aliens cross billions of light years just to lurk from the shadows and observe the mighty jews and gentiles which required centuries of analysis to understand lol

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:29:13 UTC No. 16266078

>>16266004
You do not understand the scale of the universe. I don't blame you, because our brains are not designed to understand scales like that, but at least try to really think about it. We observe dozens of new exoplanets every month, and none of them even come close to having similar conditions as Earth. Some of them are thousands of light years away. Yes. There are hundreds of billions of planets "nearby", but relative to us, the distance is just too great. Unless there are aliens in our nearest neighbour systems (LYs to tens of LYs away), it is unlikely we will ever encounter any, unless they are already headed in our direction.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:30:15 UTC No. 16266081

>>16263709
You can see all the aliens you want just go to walmart

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:08:58 UTC No. 16266135

>>16266078
>dozens of new exoplanets every month, and none of them even come close to having similar conditions as Earth
Our ability to detect exoplanets is heavily biased in favor of larger ones, like gas giants, which are less suitable to life.
Also consider that in our solar system, moons far outnumber planets (hundreds of them, with around 20 that are large enough to be regular/spherical), and some of the moons of Jupiter and Saturn are potentially habitable or at least closer to it than the other planets.
It's a reasonable assumption that moons are common throughout the rest of the universe, but we don't yet have a single confirmed exomoon detection. Those exomoons are a massive amount of potential habitat for life that's currently hidden from us

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:31:11 UTC No. 16266160

>>16266135
You raise a valid point. I wish we started examining our moons more.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:58:23 UTC No. 16266183

>>16263709
ayy he is back, listen i'm sorry i told you and your thread to fuck off, i missed it after that...

anyway, the universe is a dark forest, if you find another civilisation out there your in a cold war scenario but worse, many might choose to shoot instead of asking questions, there is no real defense for many typs of attacks, so everybody is quiet as to not get their homeworld burned..


reading the cultre by iain banks atm, they don't have homeworlds anymore but artifical ring worlds and "system ships" i guess on that power level, if you are that spread out you might can stop hideing.. maybe..

we send out radio singnals with light speed however, so by that we are findable, and we can never call the waves back we allready sended.. inverse sqaure law might save us here.. i would not expect intelegent life in the direct nighbourhood..
yet how else would you be noticalbe but by sending signal? well that signal is a growing donut, it starts a hundred years ago and it might stop sooner or later.
for us to find another civilisation we would need to get signals from their signal dounat. since space is vast and time is long, it's very unlikely we finde a dounat or they find ours.
even if in reach, earth would have send 4 billion years of static, a few hundred years of data (depending on when we die out or something) and than static again.

so yeah, chances are we are isolated by time and space and it's all up for graps.

if we find someone out there, they are a danger to us and we to them

Sage at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:58:48 UTC No. 16266184

How does this same shit reach the bump limit every time

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:04:24 UTC No. 16266205

>>16266184
>reach the bump limit
Actually these threads usually die after less than 10 replies

Sage at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:05:53 UTC No. 16266210

>>16266205
even getting 1 reply to this same thing posted multiple times per day requires an explanation. i'm assuming these threads are not being posted and samefagged by the same guy every day.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:17:18 UTC No. 16266234

>>16264418
>we don't see evidence of aliens
Everyone ignores the blatantly obvious proof of their existence at literally every single step and then says, "well there ain't no evidence. I guess they ain't here!"

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:26:56 UTC No. 16266250

>>16266234
What blatantly obvious proof? Care to share the piece/s of evidence you find most convincing?

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:04:06 UTC No. 16266384

>>16266250
It is impossible for materialists to accept only a single planet with life, as it implies humans are special.