🧵 STEM cell research retracted, highest ever cited retracted work. Longevity morons btfo.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:48:07 UTC No. 16266103
Hey longevity trannies, antiaging research is fake and gay. You will die alone and pathetically just like all of us. Stop spamming this board with your useless scam science to shill for your web traffic. Buy an ad.
Also:
>The junior author of the retracted paper get the blame for the doctored images that they didnt make
Kek. Worms in the institutions almost guarantee that any future results come out most likely is not significant and not replicated because they're performed by fraudsters. You will not reach the escape velocity. Bahahahaha, fags.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:49:19 UTC No. 16266107
Link here, longevity faggots. Lest you call me a liar.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:55:07 UTC No. 16266115
>>16266107
I dont understand the problem, it just says that the bone marrow stem cells are not the way forward to me, we should get back to cloning embryos or china is already doing it
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:57:33 UTC No. 16266117
>>16266115
>Problem
all of antiaging research is fake and gay. It has been shilled nonstop since the 2000s when I was a teenager and still nothing ever happen hahahahahaha.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:47:00 UTC No. 16266282
>>16266103
If you like death so much, why don't you just kill yourself now?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:46:57 UTC No. 16266470
>>16266282
>If you like death so much
Never said I like dying myself retard. But the constant shilling from the longevity tards based on faulty sciences has me irked for the last few months now. Faggot also called me the n word for pointing out their fantasy will not come true in this timeline.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:47:25 UTC No. 16266471
>>16266103
Imagine linking longevity to troons lmao how brain rotted are you? I assume you're a christcuck?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:50:25 UTC No. 16266476
>>16266471
I'm an agnostic faggot. Oh and I advocate for banning all religions. Just cant stand your bullshitery since the past couple of months. It's unbearable.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 06:01:22 UTC No. 16267282
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:15:13 UTC No. 16267738
>>16266471
I'm not a Christ cuck. Longevity research is typical soi boi technocratic science worship from the cult who believes in "endless progress". It's literally just a materialistic form of religious cope that tells you human immortality is possible: you just have to believe and put your faith in the Science. Longevity research and transhumanism is a quasi-relgious believe system. Even the notion of the "technological singularity" is a sort of messianic/millenialist narrative that tells of a glorious future age to come.
Even if immortality fags did succeed, the technology would only be made available to billionaires and Jews. Regular old goyim like you and me would be shit out of luck.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 05:24:57 UTC No. 16268539
>>16267738
The immortality fantasy cope is popular amongst people who are incapable of reproduction
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 07:01:04 UTC No. 16268621
>>16266103
This has nothing to do with longevity
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 07:08:26 UTC No. 16268624
>>16268621
it does, one of the most shilled longevity topic is using STEM cell to cure diseases, clone and repair organs. embryonic stem cell research is practically banned.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 07:29:23 UTC No. 16268640
>>16268624
Firstly stem cells aren’t an acronym so don’t need to be capitalised and secondly stem cell research has faced many other obstacles anyway. Longevity research has gone to the rejuvenation through Yamanaka factors route which is completely different to this paper.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 12:05:59 UTC No. 16268862
>>16268640
no he meant STEMcels BTFO
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 12:53:46 UTC No. 16268900
>>16266103
>>16268624
>STEM cell
god you people are dumb
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 11:57:28 UTC No. 16270205
ah the anti-white troon dude. he's megavaxxed btw
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 12:07:19 UTC No. 16270213
based anti-antiaging op
sage at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 12:21:28 UTC No. 16270226
>>16266103
>The post has absolutely nothing to do with the subject of the article.
Classic misinformation from /pol/tards who have the scientific culture of an oyster.
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 05:27:21 UTC No. 16271104
>>16270226
>being this obsessed with /pol/
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 12:35:13 UTC No. 16271416
>>16266471
>linking longevity to troons
>linking TRANShumanism to TRANSgenderism
>people who want to do weird stuff to themselves to defy nature
yeah I don't see the link either
Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 16:55:33 UTC No. 16272961
>>16266117
>one study is problematic
>therefore all studies are problematic.
Explain to me the logical fallacy here.
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 04:50:01 UTC No. 16273714
>>16272961
ywnbaw
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 07:32:05 UTC No. 16273841
>>16266103
People are corrupt. So naturally science will be corrupt as well. No different than religion or anything else.
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 07:33:38 UTC No. 16273845
>>16266476
>I'm an agnostic faggot. Oh and I advocate for banning all religions.
It doesn't sound like you're agnostic lol.
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 10:06:29 UTC No. 16273951
>>16272960
ha!
Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 23:03:18 UTC No. 16275208
>>16273845
low iq people lack self awareness so they're prone to contradicting themselves
Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:17:56 UTC No. 16276280
>>16275208
>dumb things are dumb
Anonymous at Thu, 11 Jul 2024 04:42:37 UTC No. 16276903
>>16266103
stem cells are just another line of pie in the sky soiyence lies which appeal to gullible idiots who've seen too much sci-fi and are too dumb to differentiate between movies and reality.
anyone remember fullerenes? same style of scam. someone won a nobel for that junk and its completely worthless
Anonymous at Thu, 11 Jul 2024 12:00:31 UTC No. 16277207
>>16266476
The stemcel in his final form after decades of indoctrination in state-sponsored brainwashing centers.
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 05:53:07 UTC No. 16278295
>>16273845
>I'm an atheist but I'm embarrassed to call myself an atheist because everyone knows what morons all atheists are so I'll try and call myself something else even though I'm too stupid to understand what the something else means
yet another example of how dumb people behave stupidly
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:44:26 UTC No. 16278817
>>16276903
Worthless? I thought bucky balls were going to be used as molecular cages. You could think of it like nanoscale hands, a practical route to Feynman's vision of colonizing the bottom.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:57:21 UTC No. 16278826
>>16266103
this has nothing to do with longevity you nigger. You can still rejuvenate any cell of the body with yamanaka factors. It's done every day.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 15:02:20 UTC No. 16278835
Why are there so many creationist morons spewing their anti science shit all over this board?
You shit for brains have no understanding of science, or even high school level mathematics. You're literally morons. Your hatred of sciencepl purely comes from the fact that you hate evolution. It's so obvious
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:31:04 UTC No. 16279013
>>16267738
You can be a pro-science/futurist without being a soi cringe redditor and wanting immortality only to consume media forever.
Also you may be confusing religious faith with optimism. Both accompany this particular topic but they are different. Try having some nuance.
>Even if immortality fags did succeed, the technology would only be made available to billionaires and Jews. Regular old goyim like you and me would be shit out of luck.
Probably.
>>16271416
Transgenders do wierd stuff to themselves and cause selfharm
Transhumanist would advocate doing wierd stuff to themselves to overcome the human condition.
Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 19:16:38 UTC No. 16279173
While OP is clearly a massive faggot, the article was an interesting read though. It's the sort of thing I'd expect a BobbyBroccoli video about.
Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 05:51:51 UTC No. 16281041
>>16279173
Why does it take 22 years to call an article BS ? 22 years without replication is ridiculous when we’re talking about something so hyped up.
Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 06:53:27 UTC No. 16281073
>>16266107
>scientificamerican.com
Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 07:12:13 UTC No. 16281086
>>16281073
The southern hemisphere doesn't want people to live longer because it makes their giant piles of scam children lose biological value. Nigs sqwack and kikes make problems to cover for them. Op is sour grapes that he wants people to die alone though.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 05:00:37 UTC No. 16282007
>>16266117
>It has been shilled nonstop since the 2000s
its been shilled way longer than that. ponce de leon was given a fortune to go searching for the fountain of youth 500 years ago
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 05:06:21 UTC No. 16282011
like many other fields of biology/medicine, antiaging research is full of fake and fradulent results. if you cultists ever want to reach LEV in this timeline, you should support auditing all of the junk that get published in this field. if there were really any significant gain that came out from those research, it would've made a big headlight and you'll see billionaires living to 120+. instead, billionaires are still dying left and right at around 90-100 max.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 05:12:59 UTC No. 16282014
OP here, I will be dying and you all will be dying like me soon. No hope for all of us. Embrace it hahaha.
>>16275208
you are a fucking retard. being agnostic and being anti-religion are different thing. dumb christ monkeys.
>>16268640
>>16268862
I'm used to type STEM so it's on autopilot. you fucking monkeys can nitpick whatever I type I don't care. you're still retarded for believing in the bullshit that is antiaging research.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 05:27:53 UTC No. 16283190
>>16282011
>like many other fields of biology/medicine, antiaging research is full of fake and fradulent results
its not just biology/medicine, every field of science is plagued by non-christians committing large scale fraud
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 05:35:50 UTC No. 16283195
>>16282014
Careful with the edge anon your mom’s gonna freak when she hears about this
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 19:46:23 UTC No. 16283963
>>16266103
>>16266107
>>16266115
>>16266117
>>16266282
>>16266470
>>16266471
>>16266476
>>16267282
>>16267738
>>16268539
>>16268621
>>16268624
>>16268640
>>16268862
>>16268900
>>16270205
>>16270213
>>16270226
>>16271104
>>16271416
>>16272960
>>16272961
>>16273714
>>16273841
>>16273845
>>16273951
>>16275208
>>16276280
>>16276903
>>16277207
>>16278817
>>16278826
>>16278835
>>16279013
>>16279173
>>16279916
>>16281041
>>16281073
>>16281086
>>16282007
>>16282011
>>16282014
>>16283190
>>16283195
If you love life so much then birth yourselves lifecucks
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 01:06:08 UTC No. 16285840
>>16283963
>t. butthurt tranny
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:26:30 UTC No. 16286313
What even matters at this point?
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 09:38:38 UTC No. 16286598
bump
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 11:31:39 UTC No. 16286973
fags
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 16:31:25 UTC No. 16287414
>>16286313
Nothing physical.
Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 06:12:54 UTC No. 16288131
>>16286313
virtue signaling and getting rich all bureaucrats and merchants, exactly like the first day of the republic.
Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 05:17:17 UTC No. 16289268
Anonymous at Sun, 21 Jul 2024 07:08:08 UTC No. 16290553
>>16266103
>highest ever cited retracted work
makes you wonder what the previous record holder was
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 04:56:15 UTC No. 16291793
>>16289268
lol
good pic
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 02:37:10 UTC No. 16292994
>>16266103
Why don't all of the papers that cited the retracted paper also get retracted? The initial retraction demonstrates that those paper citing it are based on false premises
B00T approved. at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 02:39:49 UTC No. 16292996
>>16292994
That's right.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 02:00:44 UTC No. 16294233
>>16292994
Because the retracted paper is unlikely the single one foundational premise that other papers depend on. For example it could simply be used as a point of discussion (e.g. we found this result in liver stem cells but they found this other result in marrow stem cells).
A research paper cites around 50--150 other papers.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 01:09:00 UTC No. 16295461
>>16294233
so what? if a paper is based on a false premise then the contents of that paper are false.
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 01:21:44 UTC No. 16296761
>>16295461
>I don't care if muh soiyence is fake and wrong
>muh papers muffuguh
>muh publications
>muh CV an sheeeeiiiiiiiiitttt
this is what """scientists"""" actually believe
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 21:49:51 UTC No. 16297951
>>16296761
>this is what """scientists"""" actually believe
atheists don't have consistent beliefs systems, atheists are faithless, they make up and change their stories to fit their egotistical selfish desires as they go along