๐งต was octopus the ancestor of humans
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:03:37 UTC No. 16266199
consider this: there is confirmed 550 million year old octopus fossil found from the bottom of the sea
octopus looks like a human more so than it looks like an insect
octopus evolved from sea-snail, which is essentially an evolved worm
this is how it might have happened
1. snail evolves 700 million years ago from somekind of original worm
2. snail suddenly grows eyes on stalks and grows a few tentacles on its face
3. snail evolves a calcium shell for its use, on its back
4. snails move to live on land about 450 million years ago when very few others have yet dared to make a trip, this is a dead end and land snails never evolve further but stay the same
5. another branch of snails turned into octopus roughly 100 million years before the landing, due to octopus features they are incapable of living on land despite being more advanced in a number of ways, than a snail
6. yet another branch of snails turns into the first fish, this happened also 550 million years ago
>snails turned into fish by freak mutation: their calcium shell genes went inside the worm instead of outside and they grew an inner skeleton instead of outer hard shell
>proofs? you want proofs?
consider that fish skeleton is made from same calcium material as is snail and octopus like shells, meanwhile insect hard shells are completely different for they dont contain calcium, they are made from proteine called chitin
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:06:48 UTC No. 16266212
more coincidence: the first eel that formed as a side branch of primitive jawless fish, the slime-eel produces snail like slime trail altough its even more potent than snail slime
more so, it also has 4 tentacles on its face similar to snail tentacles, what is different from snail though is it doesnt have eyes on top of stalks
however octopus eyes arent on stalks either, they are directly connected to the brain like human eyes, with a relatively short distance
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:19:36 UTC No. 16266641
>>16266199
Most feminine woman in russia btw
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:29:48 UTC No. 16266662
That sounds cool, but it is disproved by DNA testing.