Faggot at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:27:15 UTC No. 16266251

This isn't news. Look up SCIgen. It's been used for decades to create papers from randomly assembled jargon and buzzwords. In 2005 a paper generated using this software was accepted to a conference on cybernetics. This kind of stuff happening only proves a problem with the gatekeepers not with the quality of research happening.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:30:32 UTC No. 16266255

>>16266245
> publishes shitpost paper in a cultural studies journal
> filled with jargon that'd make postmodernist shills drool
> whoa, it gets published ez

I'm sorry, what does this have to do with quantum physics? You think physical review letters or even nature would fall prey to such tutorial level shitposting?

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:35:17 UTC No. 16266262

I think OP is in the "death to quantum physics" camp because while its complexity is overhyped, yet substance is still beyond him. To his paranoid mind, quantum physics is some ideology that a cabal of fraudulent scientists hide behind in some secret task to fund a "breakaway nation" whatever that means.
tl;dr quantum physics looks like all jargon, this other paper is proven all jargon, all this modern science must be nothing more than jargon, must return to hobbesian materialism

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:43:53 UTC No. 16266276

>>16266251
>>16266251
There had been nothing but hype and jargon in quantum physics it’s obviously a troll. There has been no progress on quantum computing. IBM was doing research on the superconducting computer back in the 70s and they still couldn’t get it to work after millions of dollars and over 2 decades of research.

Sorry anon Accept that you’ve been conned and move on.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:34:47 UTC No. 16266348

Uninronically, Quantum Computing can exist.
Mechanically is the cheapest and easiest to scale. Think of a white billiard ball, now use a solvent printer, paint the surface a randomized grid of colored dots. Now you can spin the ball at varying angles and velocities and get a pseudo "Quantum" result (so long as you don't stream the result) by spinning the ball on a compressed air bearing.

Porous Air bearing
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IT65SE-0ZMs

You can use compressed air bursts to "entangle" similarly duplicated ball cover patterns. This is very cheap to scale and inexpensive to continue to operate.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:47:37 UTC No. 16266363

>>16266348
Air burst to entangle? sounds like schizo quackery babble

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:11:08 UTC No. 16266504

>>16266348
Not quite. Spinning balls don't really reflect the quantum nature namely superposition and entanglement (it's not even remotely close to what you described). If you don't have those two, there's no point of using quantum computing. Quantum computing uses those two phenomena to speed up a very limited set of problems (as far as we know).

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:23:44 UTC No. 16266526

>>16266276
> lasers literally can't exist without quantum physics, and are in pretty much everything
> transistors use quantum mechanics, even more so now that their size is hitting atomic levels
> models of how chemical molecules form used by big pharma use quantum mechanics, so big pharma is conned and should move on?

stfu, clearly you don't get what you're talking about, go back to /x/ and sucking up to quantum woo and succubi

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:35:32 UTC No. 16266547

>>16266526
Transistors do not use quantum mechanics we already went over semiconductor photolithography in another post anon

Cope and seethe

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:36:42 UTC No. 16266552

Quantum physics is real and people that doubt don't necessarily believe that the earth is flat, or 5000 years old, but those groups are at least touching.
That said, the idea that quantum computing will make computers exponentially more powerful somehow is absolutely laughable but the concept is technically possible so research into it is reasonable. They all seem dishonest to me, they should be saying "we don't know if this works practically but we want to find out" instead of "oh yeah this will change the world." The freezers they run those computers in could be the equivalent of the vacuum tube computers of the 1960s, but I think the possibilities are slim.
Even if it's possible to build a practical machine, then you have to start programming in it. Again there is theoretical program language for it. Understanding normal code requires someone bright. I suspect that something built on a quantum assembly will be an order of magnitude harder to deal with. Is it worth the bother? Can it be made better? It will likely take decades to find out.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:43:07 UTC No. 16266568

>>16266547
> creation of transistors involves a fine technique that doesn't involve QM
> somehow that means the mechanism of transistors doesn't involve QM
> somehow this means that when transistors get small to the atomic level like on the computer or phone your fat fucking fingers are typing on, there's absolutely no QM involved

Ok, anon, you misinterpreted one of my three points, then acted like your argument was definitive debunking. Like, you do realize the reason why so much engineering goes into them nowadays is because of tunneling effects, a purely QM effect?

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:46:07 UTC No. 16266578

>>16266245
It's not my beloved theory, but it only tells that peer-review should be abolished and substituted by crowd-review (every sumbission should immediately appear online, and let those professors index it as got-tier or shit-tier, and let the public decide it for themselves.
Sometimes I imagine sci-hub with a comment section (I even wrote to Alexandra about building something on the top of her thing: she said that she will let me to use her vaults, but has no time to do it herself, and I have only ideas, but not qualifications)

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:46:38 UTC No. 16266580

>>16266552

We need the schizos at /g/ to stop jerking off to their stable diffusion AI generated waifus and figure out quantum computer assembly

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:17:38 UTC No. 16266636

>>16266580
I think it will work like a graphics card. Your computer can work without a graphics card (or sound card, those are outdated) but for the specialized tasks you want the specialized hardware. I imagine that IF quantum computing takes off and IF it develops into computer use, it will be like another processor and certain problems like maybe the traveling salesmen will be sent to a quantum processor
But yes all the code right now is totally theoretical except for whatever the eggheads at the cooler are running

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 23:13:44 UTC No. 16266838

>>16266251
>accepted to a conference
meh