Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:55:50 UTC No. 16266375

>>16266373
This was censored on Hacker News, lol:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40768902

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 00:31:51 UTC No. 16266928

>>16266373
>Peter McCullough
>Elsevier
Doubt

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 00:34:21 UTC No. 16266935

>>16266373
>Can this be debunked?
The best way to test this would be to keep vaxxing all liberals over and over again to see if the effect is 100% consistent.
Don't worry: They will agree to it if you just say drumpf opposes it.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 00:41:06 UTC No. 16266948

>>16266928
You've got your tenth booster then, right, anon?

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 00:48:29 UTC No. 16266955

>>16266375
The fact check they linked on the article when it was first published is terrible. Not even a veneer of a fact check. Just a statement of other things when the study itself would be classified as primary, or at most, secondary data. This is precisely the type of treatment one would expect on updoots or wokepedos.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 01:30:04 UTC No. 16266988

>>16266373
Uhh the scientists promote a research that contradicts my political propaganda that I've been swallowing for the last 4 years. Therefore the scientists are wrong

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 02:54:47 UTC No. 16267059

>>16266373
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ovn_loJp2y0&t=23s

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 02:57:31 UTC No. 16267064

>>16266373
>Forensic Science International
Sounds like a piece of shit journal, just like 95% of them. If it were in Nature, maybe it can be seriously considered.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:55:43 UTC No. 16267597

>>16267064
Appeal to authority

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 20:25:38 UTC No. 16268047

>>16267064
lol

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 21:32:08 UTC No. 16268109

>>16267597
>>16268047
what are you fags doing but not appealing to authority posting this trash paper? if we're all appealing to authority, I'll be appealing to the bigger more established authority instead, fag.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 21:35:14 UTC No. 16268114

>Can this be debunked?
Yes. Literally just fucking read their fucking data. They voted to call a fucking fatal head injury and an allergic reaction to painkillers as caused by the vaccine. None of the autopsies cited in the paper actually fucking blamed the vaccine for jack or shit.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 16:22:58 UTC No. 16269114

>>16268114
look at how bent out of shape this retard is, angrily spewing the f word because it moronically thinks it's post will somehow count more if it uses bad words for emphasis. maybe you can just scream and cry like a baby if you really want to be convincing, shit in your pants while you're at it, then you'll definitely earn our respect

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 16:39:16 UTC No. 16269133

>>16268109
nobody in this thread appealed to the authority of the publisher or authors, they presented the evidence (the paper), which you ignored to discredit the source and appeal to the authority of the great paper Nature. you have no comprehension of what logical fallacies even mean.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 16:54:21 UTC No. 16269151

>>16268114
The summary in the supplemental data isn't all they looked at. They looked at the actual autopsy reports my nigger.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 05:21:07 UTC No. 16269993

>>16269133
Nature is a political propaganda outlet, not a scientific journal

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 08:34:17 UTC No. 16270074

>>16266373
You're so desperate for attention you had to make two threads about the exact same article?

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 05:21:41 UTC No. 16271099

>>16270074
why does this topic upset you so badly?

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 13:01:53 UTC No. 16271439

>>16271099
Don't evade the question. Why did you make two threads?

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 13:36:36 UTC No. 16271473

>>16266928
>bot comment

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 13:37:42 UTC No. 16271474

>>16268109
>trash paper
You're basing this on what exactly?

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 14:24:16 UTC No. 16271507

>>16271474
Read the actual paper and not the headline. They blame covid vaccine for physical accidents.

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 15:12:41 UTC No. 16271544

>>16271474
have you ever tried to... READ the actual paper to see what kind of braindead faggots wrote this trash?

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 15:30:44 UTC No. 16271556

>>16271507
Where do they blame the vaccine for physical accidents?

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 15:55:40 UTC No. 16271581

>>16271544
What specifically is the issue with the paper?

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 16:11:24 UTC No. 16271593

>>16266373
>contained 325 autopsy cases.
I can already debunk that stats by noticing that 325 70years old men dying from post vaccination is well into the 90% efficacy rate of any vaccine
Yes
People will die even vaccunated due to the vaccine, no vaccine is 100% safe if you are a 70 yeard old dude, and I don't know why is this fact shocking, new or impressive

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 16:16:10 UTC No. 16271601

>>16271593
This
The paper noticeably left out the ratio of 70 years old men that got vaccinated and didn't die to the ones that did
If that's all they could find, damn it must be like 1 every 100k or something like that

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 16:30:17 UTC No. 16271616

>>16271593
>>16271601
What a mundane and stupid notion

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 17:03:21 UTC No. 16271637

>>16271507
Did you make this up?

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 17:13:01 UTC No. 16271644

>>16271616
How is it wrong tho

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 18:14:33 UTC No. 16271736

>>16271593
>>16271601
Yes, the paper implies misattribution of death and there were very high. The likeliness of other misattribution carries the point home that many other seventy year old deaths have also been fudged, either unexamined here or without autopsy altogether.

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 23:27:44 UTC No. 16272164

>>16271736
I'm not contesting the misattribution
I'm contesting the ratio of dead people that will never be 0, but people seems to cry if it's even 1%

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 23:50:36 UTC No. 16272188

>>16269151
>The summary in the supplemental data isn't all they looked at. They looked at the actual autopsy reports my nigger.
An actual autopsy report that concludes someone died from sepsis or fucking COVID isn't going to blame the god damn vaccine, to say nothing of the aforementioned head injury or allergic reaction. Eat shit and die.

>>16269114
I didn't hear a fucking counterargument. I accept your fucking concession.

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 00:01:32 UTC No. 16272200

>>16266373
fact checked and debunked
https://www.factcheck.org/2024/02/scicheck-review-article-by-misinformation-spreaders-misleads-about-mrna-covid-19-vaccines/

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 00:05:33 UTC No. 16272206

>>16271593
What's the point of the vaccine if the people most vulnerable to Covid19 are old people yet the vaccine is most deadly for them?

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 00:38:43 UTC No. 16272252

>>16272206
Again
You fucking knuckledragger
If you don't know,
The fucking ratio of dead people vs vaccinated non-dead people, how, in the fucking retard world, are you using the worlds "most deadly for them"
How
How, you fucking caveman retard
If there's 10 million old farts vaccinated and 325 cases are vaccine deaths
How the FUCK can you say "most deadly for them"

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 03:23:09 UTC No. 16272404

>>16272206
What's the point of seatbelts if the people most vulnerable to care crashes are old people yet seatbelts are most deadly to them?

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 03:27:44 UTC No. 16272405

>>16271439
Don't evade the question. why does this topic upset you so badly?

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 03:39:14 UTC No. 16272408

>>16266373
I am not sure if listening to music is a sign of low IQ or not but I can say for sure that blasting loud music into your ear is a pretty low IQ thing to do. Not using headphones and disturbing your neighbours is a sign of ape level intelligence

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 07:52:49 UTC No. 16272572

What a dull thread. It's not even trolling. Just bland, bot-like comments.

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 23:51:53 UTC No. 16273426