Image not available

3000x3000

interpretations o....png

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16266414

Why do people think spamming the word "quantum" over and over is how you win a debate? First off there's no consensus on how to interpret quantum mechanics. Not even close. No sorry but neither the question of determinacy or indeterminacy has been settled.

Image not available

996x452

1718579770552.png

Anonymous No. 16266422

>>16266414

Anonymous No. 16266453

> First off there's no consensus on how to interpret quantum mechanics.
So what? They all in the end give exactly the same results when you perform the calculations. None of them show that quantum mechanics as a theory is wrong.

Anonymous No. 16266462

>>16266414
>First off there's no consensus on how to interpret quantum mechanics.
Quite naturally, most of those who use that word are not aware of that (not that they care, not that they would understand)

Anonymous No. 16266463

See: >>16266453
neither understands nor even cares

Anonymous No. 16266464

>>16266414
That's what happens when every interpretation gives no testable predictions to tell you which, if any, is the correct one. That's why they are called interpretations.

Anonymous No. 16266466

>>16266414
How is ensemble interpretation evil?

Anonymous No. 16266467

>>16266463
I understand and I don't care. I simply find it funny you seem to care so much about something that doesn't affect you in any way.

Image not available

304x360

1720035954862.png

Anonymous No. 16266468

>>16266414
Don't care. Still gonna quantoom. Simple as.

Anonymous No. 16266469

>>16266414
quantum quantum quantum quantum quantum quantum quantum

Anonymous No. 16266475

>>16266467
I care about the truth, even when I do not understand it. And so should you.

Anonymous No. 16266478

>>16266475
You don't care about the truth or else you wouldn't repost that retarded and wrong OP picture. In fact, I can infer that you only care about trolling and shitposting.

Anonymous No. 16266489

>>16266478
The only thing I answered to the picture is "How is ensemble interpretation evil?" (at first I didn't even look at it)

Anonymous No. 16266763

>>16266414
superdeterminism is the least schizo theory here.

Anonymous No. 16266779

>>16266414
"Many Worlds" is more philosophical/nonscientific than "Quantum Mysticism"
assuming that consciousness is fully figured out is really funny.
it's even funnier that it's easier for redditors to assume infinity universes than accept that consciousness isn't fully understood.