Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:53:29 UTC No. 16266481

>>16266474
You can shine lasers at mirrors on the moon to measure the distance.
How did they get there?

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:44:27 UTC No. 16266572

What did OP mean by this?
>>16266495

sage at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:47:32 UTC No. 16266582

>>16266572
cut him some slack, he's a nigger

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:09:04 UTC No. 16266626

literally who
lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 00:43:19 UTC No. 16266949

tired of seeing this hermaphroditic negro everywhere

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 07:03:19 UTC No. 16267332

>>16266481
Aliens

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 08:19:43 UTC No. 16267381

>>16266474
>did we go to the moon?
yes
>I doubt it
that's your problem
>I think Terrence Howard's argument on NASA's current massive struggle to go "back" to the moon only proves this
your problem, again

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:56:44 UTC No. 16267429

>>16266481
While I'm not a 'men have never been on the Moon' conspiracy theorist, the mirrors could have been placed there by unmanned probes. Also unless you are operating the equipment yourself and have inspected it completely to verify its operation, you can't say it actually is sending anything to the Moon, much less receiving it back.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 10:52:45 UTC No. 16267460

>>16266474
If the moon landing was fake then you should be explain how the near-100GB of apollo images were procured that look completely photorealistic to the point that they're impossible to replicate even with modern CGI

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 14:01:20 UTC No. 16267601

>>16267460
They didn't use CGI back then
(those photographs are taken not that far from here)

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 15:24:15 UTC No. 16267683

>>16266474
>did we go to the moon
No group including you went to the moon, therefore, no.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 15:32:14 UTC No. 16267691

>>16267601
Funny how noone can replicate them even with real objects, then

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 15:40:19 UTC No. 16267700

>NASA's current massive struggle to go "back" to the moon

The NASA of the 1960s was young, lean, smart, and had a clear and simple mission.

The NASA of today is a mature and bloated bureaucracy, filled with DIE, and tied down like Gulliver to congressional politicians, who mandated they return to the moon using only leftover shuttle parts rather than a new clean-sheet rocket. All else stems from that.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 15:50:27 UTC No. 16267709

>>16266474
I used to believe 100% that people were on the moon. Today I'm like 99% but none of it has anything to do with that retarted attention whore nigger. There is just a lot of messy shit around it. A lot.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:27:09 UTC No. 16267753

>>16267691
What is there to replicate? Did anybody try?