Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 06:42:14 UTC No. 16267311

the creator isnt omniscient

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 06:48:15 UTC No. 16267317

>>16267311
god isn't necessarily omniscient either but he's omnipotent (probably) so he could be omniscient whenever he wants (I'm making all of it up)

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 07:01:20 UTC No. 16267330

>>16267308
The creators can be technologically advanced but still otherwise mortal and limited humans.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 10:24:20 UTC No. 16267441

zero evidence to back up simulation theory,
like ZERO

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:14:24 UTC No. 16267561

Simulation theory is Jewish trickery
Creationism is le based and retvrn-to-trvditivn-pilled

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:34:53 UTC No. 16267581

>>16267561
The Old Testament is literally written by Jews, what the hell are you on about

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:51:32 UTC No. 16267594

>>16267308
Discussion of the meta-universe is inherently unscientific and exists solely in the realm of logic.
So yes, simulation theory is very similar to creationism.
Creationism (let’s just ignore YEC) is no less credible than any other meta-universal theory (many worlds, samsara, etc,). You either entertain meta-universal ideas generally, or you shut up about them. The worst is being hypocritical about it and being a simulation theorist (everything in the universe was fine tuned to match the real one) while acting as though “God” is a laughably stupid concept.

My own opinion is as follows:
Everything about the universe seems infinitely reducible in scale. This is noncharacteristic of any currently producible simulation; and there’s no evidence that a simulation can run with numbers which are infinitely reducible.