Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:11:23 UTC No. 16267557

>>16267554
>A x A = 2A
lol no

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:19:07 UTC No. 16267566

>>16267554
>A x A = 2A
Seems legit. Excellent work, Travayon.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:20:31 UTC No. 16267568

>>16267554
>A x A = 2A
>1 x 1 = 2(1)
>1 x 1 = 2
that's not algebra:

one thing (1 set of some number of elements) x another thing (1 set of 1 element) = 2 things being multiplied.

Therefore, he answers a question which isn't the correct way to interpret the arithmetic expression "1x1":
>how many things are being multiplied?
In other words, he is counting expression components. If he were referring to a textual phrase, he'd be counting the number of words in a phrase.

But that's not how arithmetic works. Arithmetic, in particular when expressed as multiplication of sets of elements, is a simplified way of expressing a long addition (counting, the basic function of arithmetic), an addition that occurs in the " back-end" of multiplication. Therefore, multiplication answers the following question instead:
>how many total set elements are there once one adds a certain number of sets of a certain number of set elements each
For example, 5 x 4 means either
>add 4 things to each other 5 times, or
>add 5 things to each other 4 times.

That's why it doesn't matter which way you do multiplication (permutation), it's fundamentally addition!

Terrence's playing with words, messing with your brain, basically.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:24:53 UTC No. 16267576

>>16267568
Are you so autistic that you can’t understand sarcasm?

Stop being such an uptight fag

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:57:52 UTC No. 16267599

>>16267566
תודה

>>16267557
youre not part of this solution.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 21:47:11 UTC No. 16268131

>>A x A = 2A
Dayuummm I always thought sum wrong in maffs, dis theorem finna proves it!! Dey always taught A x A =A^2 which sounded wrong to me. I'm now fully convinced by the nigga that he's right.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 22:22:05 UTC No. 16268167

1x1 = one ones
2x2 = two twos
3x3 = three threes

0x0 = zero zeros, that would make empty spot 0x0=_

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 23:20:54 UTC No. 16268212

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 23:48:37 UTC No. 16268252

>>16268212
>Neil didn't invent the tetriom , the huntriom, or the cosmic foam thermoze
At least science meets pop culture somewhere... What the slope of this equation??

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 23:55:13 UTC No. 16268259

>>16267554
>when this NPD addled fucktard showed up to debate Weinstein with all his tinker toy widgets and all the other could do was compliment how pretty they looked like a mystified adult tacking some ugly crayon art to the fridge

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 01:05:24 UTC No. 16268300

>>16268259
tbf Weinstein does like geometry toys and even brought some of his own

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 02:01:44 UTC No. 16268343

Am I understanding him right?

If 1×1=2 in Terryology, then 2×1=4 in Terryology? And 20×1=40? Is that what his system is?

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 02:55:29 UTC No. 16268375

>>16267568
lol wordup

The Will Of God at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 03:10:06 UTC No. 16268385

Is it heresy to say, like Terrence Howard, that the root of all evil is the love of money??

>Baháʼí Faith For The Middle East

The Will Of God at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 03:12:01 UTC No. 16268386

>>16268131
Le Tree Fiddy equation

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 18:05:29 UTC No. 16269238

>>16267554
yeah mayne, if i like got me one piece ah fraahd chikin and have anotho piece ah fraahd chikin by it, looks like ah gats me 2 pieces ah fraahd chikin. no wat im sayin mayne? 1 by 1 = 2 chikin

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 18:50:36 UTC No. 16269303

>>16267554
kek

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 19:04:40 UTC No. 16269326

>>16267568
>In other words, he is counting expression components. If he were referring to a textual phrase, he'd be counting the number of words in a phrase.
Sometimes I think it would be fascinating to round up all the blacks and quarantine them to allow them to develop culturally and intellectually without the interference of humans, and observe them as they develop into humans and start to work out these new concepts like math and philosophy on their own.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 19:08:47 UTC No. 16269333

>>16268343
>then 2×1=4 in Terryology?
2x1 is 3 in Terromatics. 20x1 is 21. He's just summing the number of integers because he doesn't understand multiplication.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 19:51:54 UTC No. 16269392

>>16268385
>the root of all evil is the love of money??
No anon, the root of all evil is trauma.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 19:53:35 UTC No. 16269393

>>16269333
Wait but I thought his principles were
>action and and action always cause a reaction
>actions must be expressed under units within Terryology to make sense of their dimensions, you can't make physical sense of something without units to measure it
>1x1=/=1 in Terryology because it's doesn't properly relate the reaction of taking an action expressed as a unit of 1 and another action whose unit happens to have the same value in this example, otherwise it'll just leave us with one or the other action without the second action, hence no reaction, so the result of 1x1 must be something other than 1
>multiplication is exaggerated addition, we take a unit of something and keep adding the units together under the signifier of another unit instead of expressing a long chain of the former units under the addition sign
>therefore 1x1=2
If I correctly understand his logic he is basically redefining multiplication within his particular philosophical framework that starts with a basic assumption about action and reaction. For him 1x1 seems to be the same as saying take 1, as in take the literal first item of the expression, and add it to the other unit of the expression which is a stand in for the repeated addition of that unit a particular amount of times, so 5x5=30, 7x2=21, etc.

It's also why in his original paper he gives the example of taking 1 away from each unit of the expression to result in the contradiction of 1=0. Obviously this is just silly under our normal rules of inference but, if we go off of the assumptions of Terryology this makes perfect sense by
1. The way he redefines multiplication
and
2. His metaphysical system where something (an action) cannot be the same as nothing (no-thingness or no-actioness). The contradiction of 1=0 is not just a logical contradiction for Terry, it's a metaphysical one too.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 19:55:08 UTC No. 16269396

>>16268259
Weinstein did an amazing job at handling this dude. Maybe hebes aint so bad.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 20:12:50 UTC No. 16269413

>>16269393
>>16269333
I forgot to mention that 2x1 would not be the same as 1x2 in Terryology. Multiplication under Terryology is not commutative (xy=/=yx)

In Terryology, if I am understanding the logic correct, 1x2 means the same as: 1+(1+1)=3; but 2x1 would mean the same as: 2+(2)=4.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 20:38:46 UTC No. 16269464

>>16269393
>as in take the literal first item of the expression, and add it to the other unit of the expression which is a stand in for the repeated addition of that unit a particular amount of times, so 5x5=30, 7x2=21
this is too high for me. i cannot reach unto it.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 22:54:44 UTC No. 16269636

>>16269393
It is rrally not that hard of a concept to understand, and the clearest example is "if you have an apple and multiply it by another apple, you get nonsense, not 2 apples or 1 apple"

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 04:32:12 UTC No. 16269956

>>16269636
That concept is so fucking stupid because that's not how numbers work. This is basic ass arithmetic elementary level, retard.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 09:18:04 UTC No. 16270104

>>16267568
>Terrence's playing with words, messing with your brain, basically.
Projection as that's what you're doing.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 10:30:07 UTC No. 16270139

>>16267554
>A x A = 2A
>3 x 3 = 2(3)
>3 x 3 = 6
anon.....................................................................................................................................................................

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 10:36:50 UTC No. 16270141

>>16269333
actually if one attempts to follow terryology to letter, we get that 2*2=6

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 10:51:54 UTC No. 16270154

>>16269636
that's why you multiply two by two, not two apples by two apples. some cultures never made that jump btw, they have no numbers-as-nouns.
advanced use: unit algebra. two apples times two apples equals four apples squared.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 12:49:52 UTC No. 16270251

I have the fatigue bros

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 18:31:26 UTC No. 16270562

>>16267554
Surely you mathleets can create a metric where 1^2=2 and 1^3=abs(pi)

It would be impressive to demonstrate rayleigh plesset on the metric

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 18:35:20 UTC No. 16270565

>97 patents
Not counting the fact that most of his patents are fake and gay (filed is different from being awarded, retards try to file a patent sometimes), patents have very low intellectual content. They're probably worse than course projects by grad students. One good paper at a top venue might be worth 10 patents.

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 12:34:49 UTC No. 16271415

>>16267554
Why did he do it /sci/ bros

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 12:42:57 UTC No. 16271425

>>16271415
Nobody cared who he was until he published the trash

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 22:40:30 UTC No. 16272097

Four hours of good faith debate and criticism and at the end Howard is still saying shit like
>I want to give these tools to the scientific community
He simply does not understand humility. Even after having his hand held by Weinstein and being told he might have bits & pieces worth looking at with his ideas on music temperament, Howard still imagines himself a prophet and it’s everyone else’s fault for not listening.

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 23:33:23 UTC No. 16272169

>>16267554
AA = BA
Something

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 02:39:40 UTC No. 16272371

>>16267554
You have been conned by an ACTOR. Don't feel /too/ stupid, bro; that's his 'job'.

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 11:23:55 UTC No. 16272701

HI TERRANCE! EVER BEEN IN A DINOSAUR THREAD?

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 14:15:41 UTC No. 16272816

>>16267576
The whole point of /sci/ is baiting uptight fags who think they are right about everything.

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:11:16 UTC No. 16272856

>>16272816
NO IT ISN"T!

Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 19:20:41 UTC No. 16274776

>>16269393
Holy shit, the way you laid it out fucking makes sense now. Terrance has an incredible mind but I do think he lacks a lot of capacity in the “ideas transmission” department. Hopefully this do change the world for the better!

Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 22:17:28 UTC No. 16275126

>entire board got btfo by phd in mathematics

Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 22:45:30 UTC No. 16275177

>>16267554
He hasn’t come up with anything. It’s all stuff he’s been taught by his woke rich friends and he thinks he’s doing his due diligence by talking about it and getting people to have a conversation about it. He doesn’t know what he’s talking about but I think it’s cool that he isn’t afraid to talk about it and doesn’t care what people think.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:16:57 UTC No. 16275333

>>16268259
>baby t realizes how far out of his depth he is
>immediately shuts the fuck up every time Big Boy E tells him to shut up
I've never seen someone get so utterly dismantled. After Eric stated that Terrence couldn't do very basic algebra the dude collapsed.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:41:45 UTC No. 16276002

>he's wrong
>goalpost shift
>if he's right all of math is fucked
>goalpost shift
>he is a supernatural character from a fantasy series able to wield fictional word magic that magically warps the brain, he must be stopped!
.

Anonymous at Thu, 11 Jul 2024 04:34:38 UTC No. 16276897

>>16269392
>trauma
All of the most brilliant minds are a result of trauma in their younger years.
Trauma snaps you out of being a simp.

Anonymous at Thu, 11 Jul 2024 12:05:10 UTC No. 16277217

wouldn't the lynchpin be more symmetrical and make more sense if the pentagons would be replaced by circles and connected in the middle with tetra terryen shaped object. It would allow seamless connection.
Going with pentagons and straight lines eliminates the need for tetra terryen in the middle which goes against the very nature of what Terry is trying to tech us.
Opinions?

Anonymous at Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:27:29 UTC No. 16277327

>>16277217
T E T R I U M
E U
T I
R R
I T
U E
M U I R T E T

Anonymous at Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:24:09 UTC No. 16277399

>>16267554
If A×A=2A makes 1×1=2 true,
Then 2/1 must be equivalent to 1.

Multiply it to make it more visual of how retarded you are;

10/5=5
24/12=12

Let's multiply the equation on both sides by any given number;

8×8=16
9×9=18
10×10=20

See a pattern?
It's the fucking solutions for the equation 2×A=2A

Why did this happen?
Because A×A is A2 not 2A dog fucker.

Anonymous at Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:26:49 UTC No. 16277403

>>16277399
Meant to use A^2 at the end there

Anonymous at Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:10:22 UTC No. 16277459

>1^3=pi
does it mean that pi = 3
or
equation 1^3 = pi because the number 1 is allowed to expand in the multiplication process?
if so does is mean that 1x1x1=pi because the value of 1 has accumulated to Cube root of pi in the multiplication process. Would this mean that 1x1= more than one but less than 2,929(2 x cube root of pi)

Anonymous at Thu, 11 Jul 2024 19:46:10 UTC No. 16277752

new news dropped
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xdVdzaQzP8

Anonymous at Thu, 11 Jul 2024 20:44:26 UTC No. 16277837

>>16277752
>panic at the disco

Barkon Approved Post at Thu, 11 Jul 2024 20:45:29 UTC No. 16277840

>>16277837
Ga'qle