Image not available

576x723

yjk.png

🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16268006

which is more likely to produce retarded kids, having a child with a 40+ year old woman, or having a child with a close relative, like impregnating one of your daughters for instance

pic unrelated

Anonymous No. 16268010

don't do it

Anonymous No. 16268017

>>16268010
which? let's say hypothetically i just want a good kid and these are my only options

Anonymous No. 16268029

>>16268006
fun fact: +40 yo boomer men are also likely to produce retarded children due to low quality sperm

Anonymous No. 16268149

>pov: you just unzipped you're BBC

Anonymous No. 16268157

>>16268006
Whichever one is redheaded or has redheaded parents or grandparents.

Image not available

646x907

le no son face.jpg

Anonymous No. 16268158

Anonymous No. 16268183

>>16268017
>let's say hypothetically i just want a good kid and these are my only options
In your case, donor sperm. Also the obvious answer to your question is to avoid procreation with relatives.

Since you have never properly defined "retarded" and probably don't mean Down's which is one of the few conditions actually related to and correlated with old mothers, the question is ill-defined in the first place. And since the one group likely to ask that question are socially reclusive virgins with developmental issues/mental health problems in their early to late '20s, the options for a "good" kid are quite limited in the first place.

Anonymous No. 16268207

>>16268006
Having a kid with an old woman has higher chance of the kid being retarded.

Anonymous No. 16268311

>>16268006
>which is more likely to produce retarded kids, having a child with a 40+ year old woman, or having a child with a close relative, like impregnating one of your daughters for instance

A 40+ year old woman would statistically skew towards a more literally retarded child; autism, aspergers, that kind of thing.
A child with your own child would skew more towards physical deformities; fused fingers, bent legs or bone problems, hair lip, impotency, unexpected auto-immune problems, that kind of thing.

>>16268017
>which? let's say hypothetically i just want a good kid and these are my only options

In this hypothetical it'd be less about a "good kid" and more about what you, personally, think would think would be more tolerable.

Anonymous No. 16268519

>>16268006
>one of your daughters
That would for sure be retarded. You should be having children with ALL of them.

Anonymous No. 16268572

>>16268006
>having a child with a close relative, like impregnating one of your daughters for instance
this is more likely. probabilistically speaking

Anonymous No. 16268576

>>16268017
>these are my only options
pathetic

Anonymous No. 16268611

>>16268006
Anon having kids.
Which is difficult to happen anyway.

Anonymous No. 16268626

>>16268006
I want to impregnate each and every woman in this image. holyshit

Anonymous No. 16268688

>>16268029
t. salty roastie

Anonymous No. 16268705

>>16268006
depends how old they are but probably the roastie if she can even get pregnant
the risks of inbreeding are generally overblown assuming they aren't compounded

Anonymous No. 16268722

>>16268311
>A 40+ year old woman would statistically skew towards a more literally retarded child; autism, aspergers, that kind of thing.
First, it wouldn't.
Second, in what way does asperger's, for example, make someone retarded since that diagnosis specifically calls for an absence of mental retardation? The answer is incoherent.

Anonymous No. 16268725

>>16268722
>The answer is incoherent.
I don't think people care about that. the whole point is that they try to rationalize why they should score with teens and why this doesn't make them pedophiles. since we're talking about dumbfucks they don't know any other diagnosis than muh autism so they come up with some made up association between old mothers and their own diagnosis. it's all projection.

Anonymous No. 16268730

I could fuck any woman and my sperm would create a perfect child.

Anonymous No. 16268732

>>16268722
Your reply reveals that you have Asperger’s, and are therefore retarded

Anonymous No. 16268742

>>16268732

Taste me bro.

Anonymous No. 16268755

>>16268688
t. single boomer

Anonymous No. 16268759

>>16268149
why do white people make incels seethe so much

Image not available

720x888

Merry.jpg

Anonymous No. 16269010

>>16268006

Anonymous No. 16269012

>>16268006
chav aesthetic

Anonymous No. 16269036

Having a daughter is a huge L. I used to think about how horrible that would be when I was a fuckboy in high school and undergrad. No more, I am too paranoid about having a daughter now. I will adopt a son if I ever decide to actually get married.

Anonymous No. 16269379

>>16269036
Depends on how many children your father had.
My dad had six kids between two woman, 4 sons and 2 daughters. My grandfather had 5 sons and 5 daughters. So statistically I should have a 50-60% of my first born being a boy.
Of course if you're a whitey with no siblings you'll never know

Anonymous No. 16269422

Imagine all the black cocks penetrating his daughters

sage No. 16269439

>>16268006
Incest is the best way to have abnormal children.

Anonymous No. 16270606

>>16268759
Because most incels are brown

Anonymous No. 16270613

>>16268006
Inbreeding increasing the odds of poor gene expression
a hag's eggs are so fucking malformed you'll have all kind of new genetic issues plus the environmental issues from an old infertile womb

Anonymous No. 16270635

>>16269036
>I am too scared to have a daughter
>so I will ADOPT a son

Anonymous No. 16270650

>>16268157
fingers of an envious woman typed that crap

Anonymous No. 16270653

>>16268207
I know people who had a retarded daughter when they were young, and ten years later had two absolutely normal kids (looking pretty much like them, so I suppose they are their own flesh and blood)
so your crap is just another side of the anti-natalism cohen (the first one was "you're too young to be a parent")