Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 04:38:09 UTC No. 16268473

>>16268416
Aliens downloaded the info into his brain

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 04:53:34 UTC No. 16268496

I mean, the way we use this numeral system in the west is kind of ass.
I could see how a more natural way of thinking about it could lead to better results.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 05:18:48 UTC No. 16268528

>>16268416
Consider how you yourself come to conclusions through intuition. Consider the obvious statement, if a and b are greater than 0 then a+b is greater than both a and b. Now this is something everyone will say well yes obviously because you are adding and getting more. Now this is different from giving a rigorous argument. Saying it is obvious doesn't say jack shit to someone who doesn't know what addition is. Now lets up the game a bit, I don't know your level of education, but many people who have taken calculus would find the statement, the nth derivative of the product of two functions can be expressed as a the sum of products of derivatives of order less than n of the functions, is quite obvious too and most people would say that is just the product rule. But this would obviously look like nonsense to someone who know nothing about calculus. The point is that intuition grows as one learns more shit. It also depends on your "mental speed" some people simply can do shit in their heads faster. It seems Ramanujan was both obsessed with math, in particular in solving certain class of math problems, and was extremely fast, which builds intuition a lot. I mean he basically failed at everything that wasn't math or religion, which may explain why he found explanation of certain things through his religious views. He also was really only interested in certain mathematical questions. WIth this is not really that crazy that for me to believe what he achieved. There are people who have individual characteristic of this and they are already rare, it just take the proper combination.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 15:42:49 UTC No. 16269051

Based Gigapajeet

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 15:58:44 UTC No. 16269077

>>16268416
His notes fully derived that equation. He attributed his discoveries to divine inspiration but regardless there is no reason to believe he magically pulled anything out of his ass.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 17:44:02 UTC No. 16270516

There has to be a logical way to come up with that equation, right? It cannot just exist on its own without a step-by-step way to find it, right?

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 18:03:42 UTC No. 16270534

>>16270516
Even the greatest poojeets are smelly lying cow worshipers.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chudnovsky_algorithm

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 18:38:30 UTC No. 16270569

>>16270534
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramanujan%E2%80%93Sato_series retard, that algorithm is literally "based on Ramanujan's π formulae" what are you trying to prove?

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 18:39:54 UTC No. 16270570

God did it... well an indian god but same idea

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 18:44:10 UTC No. 16270576

>>16270570
Based Raman believed all religions were equally correct

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 18:44:32 UTC No. 16270577

>>16270569
There’s a full proof showing how to derive it. It didn’t come out of nowhere

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 19:26:00 UTC No. 16270628

>>16270576
Lol that's a veiled way of saying they're all incorrect because they can only all be equally correct if their correctness is zero, since they're all mutually inconsistent. A mathematician wouldn't use the word "equally" lightly.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 19:58:15 UTC No. 16270658

>>16268473
fpbp

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 20:01:16 UTC No. 16270662

>>16270628
>all religions are equally wrong
*tips fedora*

No, correct in the sense they were all paths to the same divine spirit. Mathematicians are capable of compartmentalizing and accepting there are different kinds of truth. Faith and hard logic in a non-autistic mindset can be complementary.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 20:50:43 UTC No. 16270718

>>16270628
there isn't anything mutually inconsistent. you're just ignorance. if you talk to some jeet they believe that all gods from different religions are just the same eternal god manifest into different bodies at different era to pass on their teaching. in fact, they also believe that different religion are just different manifestation of the multiple ways to worship such god. hence they believe all religion are correct as long as they teach someone to belive in god.

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 04:06:53 UTC No. 16271058

>>16268416
Atheists? heh, checkmate.

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 13:35:48 UTC No. 16272779

>>16270576
Not really a revelation if all religions are wrong.

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 13:38:08 UTC No. 16272781

he was fed them by a white guy with white guilt

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 13:51:00 UTC No. 16272795

>>16270718
There is another group out there that structures God as those elements common in religion which do not contradict each other. This narrows down most claims about the afterlife to its mere existence. Obviously, religious beliefs like global warming and atheism are not in this group, so their whinging fugues be damned.

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 13:53:01 UTC No. 16272797

Fags

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 17:27:29 UTC No. 16273005

(((x+1)^2+(y)^2)-1)(((x-1)^2+(y)^2)-1)(((x)^2/1)+((4-y)^2/16)-1)=0.1

Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 17:06:09 UTC No. 16274391

number equals some convergent series isnt an impressive thing

Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 17:08:22 UTC No. 16274400

Can someone name a more useless and ugly mathematics than number theory?

Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 17:10:17 UTC No. 16274406

>>16274400
scategory theory

Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 17:53:16 UTC No. 16274519

>>16274400
The only mathematics worth doing is that which has no practical use

Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 20:16:29 UTC No. 16274927

>>16268416
Many early analyses of Ramanujan's work claim that he tended to pull theorems out of thin air. Indeed, his early notebooks (before he moved to England) often had huge leaps. The reason was that he couldn't afford to write down every step in his notebook. Paper costs money, and if you're the son of a low-level village civil servant in 19th-century India, the cost is actually quite significant. So he did most of his work on a slate and only committed "significant" steps to paper. Also, he didn't exactly have a comprehensive library, and often overestimated the state of the art, assuming that many of his results were already well known (when they were actually completely novel) and not worth wasting valuable paper on.