Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 10:27:15 UTC No. 16268782

Lol

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 10:27:18 UTC No. 16268783

what journal?

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 10:47:01 UTC No. 16268790

>>16268780
This is what happens when your career depends on how many papers you can possibly publish in a year.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 11:30:55 UTC No. 16268822

>>16268780
this shit is peer reviewed lmao

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 11:50:53 UTC No. 16268848

There was also a Swedish whore "researching" BBC cuz she dreams of dick all day

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 12:01:30 UTC No. 16268859

>>16268783
Dance Chronicle

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 12:04:09 UTC No. 16268861

>>16268780
It seems to be a serious injustice that there are brilliant people outside academia who can't get their work published, meanwhile people within the system are shitting up journals stuff like this

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 12:08:56 UTC No. 16268864

>>16268780
This language is so formulaic. Every single phrase depends on some theory of political or social factors. You can't critique this paper in a scientific manner without using the same language. This is the opposite of science. Instead of clear, structured language seeking to describe reality succinctly these people publish byzantine texts that require a degree to decipher. Not one bit of this paper is reproducible or scientifically sound and not based on the personal feelings and preconceptions of the author.

The entire field of social studies needs to be condemned. Defund these people.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 12:18:22 UTC No. 16268873

>>16268861
It's slowly eating away at the reputation of academia, and before you know it being published in an academic journal just won't carry any prestige or sense of official recognition, and serious people will find other means to communicate their research.
Institutions like that aren't set in stone.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 12:20:29 UTC No. 16268875

>>16268864

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 12:38:18 UTC No. 16268889

>>16268875
The genius of calvin and hobbes is often so prophetic

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 12:55:02 UTC No. 16268902

>>16268780
relevance of this to science?

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:02:35 UTC No. 16268912

>>16268859
Aims and scope

Dance Chronicle is an independent, peer-reviewed journal published three times a year by Routledge, an imprint of Taylor & Francis. Founded in 1977 by George Dorris and Jack Anderson, Dance Chronicle is one of only two journals covering the field of dance studies in the United States. The journal is international in scope and interdisciplinary in vision—as indicated by its subtitle Studies in Dance and the Related Arts—with a strength in historical research. Dance Chronicle accepts submissions on any topic related to the field of dance within historical or contemporary contexts. Strong submissions situate their arguments within established and emerging conversations on the aesthetic, social, economic, and political dimensions of dance. The journal welcomes interdisciplinary articles and submissions not only from scholars of dance, but also from those working in related disciplines, such as theater and performance studies, cultural studies, ethnic studies, gender studies, and history. Our purview encompasses research rooted in humanities-based paradigms including historical and ethnographic methodologies; quantitative or scientific articles fall outside the purview of the journal. The editors welcome submissions of original, scholarly research, reviews of recent books, and proposals for special issues that address specific topics within dance studies. The journal facilitates an ethical and rigorous review process that supports authors to produce sound, well-written articles. Book reviews and Witness/Experience essays are organized by associate editors. If you have an interest in reviewing a book or responding to an event, please first email one of the journal's editors.

Peer Review Policy:
All research papers in this journal have undergone editorial screening and peer review.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:03:49 UTC No. 16268915

>>16268864
As someone with no history in higher education that paper is actually pretty easy to read, it's trying to sound sophisticated but a lot of the language is pretty basic. Shit doesn't hold a candle to the unreadability of the average STEM paper

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:17:17 UTC No. 16268933

>>16268859
articles from volume 47 2024
https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ldnc20/47/2?nav=tocList
>Tapping the Margins: Feminist Research in Tap Dance History
>Indian Dance Criticism as Decolonial Post-Performance Performative
>Memory Transgressed by Female Bodies: Civil Historiography Contrasted with Official Historiography
>Ariadne’s Thread: A Depth Psychology Exploration of Liminal Immanence in Dance/Movement

It all seems to be like this

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:40:08 UTC No. 16268962

>Booty dances have threatened the status quo by emphasizing group membership, the free movement of forceful Black bodies, and Afro-Diasporic counter-narratives. The Colombian mapalé, or baile negro, is a case in point. Mapalé recalls the fish tail dances of the North American plantation; Davila writes that ‘the fish’s movements after they are captured resemble [the dance’s] pelvic and midriff contractions to the beat of the drum’ (Davila 2009, 120). ‘The only dance that was permitted during times of Spanish rule’, mapalé became associated with rebellion through its liberatory insistence on the body’s value as a vector for the transmission of ancestral knowledge (Davila 2009, 120). ‘Where dance on a social level was criminalized, in Mapalé, it continues to be an indestructible force of Afro-Colombian identity within the fabric of the Atlantic Coast’ (Davila 2009, 134). The batuque, with its ‘artificial rotations and contortions of the hip’ was officially suppressed, as were candombe and the bongo (quoted in Röhrig Assunção 2003, 167). The consensus is that such dances cognate to twerk – as indicated by their names and presence among Bantu-language-speaking slaves – are Central African in origin. A number of scholars well versed in the matter have arrived at Kubik’s conclusion: ‘motional emphasis on the pelvis, buttocks, etc., especially pelvis thrusts or circular pelvis movements described in United States jazz dance history as “Congo grind” are always suspect of a Congo/Angola background’ (Kubik 1979, 20).

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17528631.2015.1055650

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:47:20 UTC No. 16268967

>>16268780
how isn't twerking the most patriarchal and sexist and offensive dance there is? everything in it seems to be about the ass and hip and making woman have big asses to make men hot

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:49:19 UTC No. 16268969

>>16268915
You recognize the words but that is all. Amongst social scientists these words have meanings specific to their discipline. The specialist usage of these words is one defense against critique. Because you might think you are formulating a good rebuttal but the scholar can simply turn around and retreat into academics.

Stuff like racism is prejudice plus power is a great example. Normal people read a paper from the social sciences where whiteness is described as something bad. We think, that that is clearly racist, as in, prejudiced against a certain race. But the social scientist can ignore accusations of racism because in his field racism is something else than in everyday use.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 14:45:00 UTC No. 16269006

Women really think that because human men absolutely lose their minds over pussy, that their vaginas are actually magic.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 14:50:27 UTC No. 16269011

>>16269006
They're not wrong, actually.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 15:19:35 UTC No. 16269025

This is social "science". It has nothing to do with the hard sciences or mathematics. People shit on medicine for being non-rigorous at times, but these fields are on another planet.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 15:24:45 UTC No. 16269032

>>16268915
The average STEM paper is not commenting on larger systems, it is only making narrow claims about its field using highly technical language understood by its small audience. Papers like these are aimed at a much wider audience and intend to have a social impact. I certainly cannot read high-level papers outside my field easily, but I can within my field.

There is also >>16268969. We mean highly specific things by our jargon which are easily falsifiable with new data. The typical social sciences response to criticism, even the empirical sort, is to pretend what you wrote means something else.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 15:55:43 UTC No. 16269071

>>16268780
Why do you post gender studies on math and science board

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 15:56:28 UTC No. 16269072

>>16268822
problem?

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 17:22:30 UTC No. 16269192

>>16269006
>that their vaginas are actually magic.
This paper is actually claiming that black asses, rather than vaginas, are magic. Maybe African vaginas will be the subject of a separate paper.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 17:24:20 UTC No. 16269194

>>16268967
Nooooo you don't get it it's actually empowering or something you're just a shill for the patriarchy

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 17:45:48 UTC No. 16269216

>Dance Chronicle is an independent, peer-reviewed journal published three times a year by Routledge, an imprint of Taylor & Francis. Founded in 1977 by George Dorris and Jack Anderson, Dance Chronicle is one of only two journals covering the field of dance studies in the United States. The journal is international in scope and interdisciplinary in vision—as indicated by its subtitle Studies in Dance and the Related Arts—with a strength in historical research. Dance Chronicle accepts submissions on any topic related to the field of dance within historical or contemporary contexts. Strong submissions situate their arguments within established and emerging conversations on the aesthetic, social, economic, and political dimensions of dance. The journal welcomes interdisciplinary articles and submissions not only from scholars of dance, but also from those working in related disciplines, such as theater and performance studies, cultural studies, ethnic studies, gender studies, and history. Our purview encompasses research rooted in humanities-based paradigms including historical and ethnographic methodologies; quantitative or scientific articles fall outside the purview of the journal. The editors welcome submissions of original, scholarly research, reviews of recent books, and proposals for special issues that address specific topics within dance studies. The journal facilitates an ethical and rigorous review process that supports authors to produce sound, well-written articles. Book reviews and Witness/Experience essays are organized by associate editors. If you have an interest in reviewing a book or responding to an event, please first email one of the journal's editors.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 17:47:30 UTC No. 16269217

>>16269216
>Peer Review Policy:
>All research papers in this journal have undergone editorial screening and peer review.

>The Institute of Scientific Information Journal Citations Report for 2003 ranks th out of journals in (Social Science) and th out of journals in , with an impact factor of .[broken embed]

>_____________________________________ -->
Interesting.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 18:11:42 UTC No. 16269248

>>16268967
Manipulating a man with T and A is easier than earning his respect

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 02:02:43 UTC No. 16269815

damn

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 02:05:50 UTC No. 16269819

>>16268780
That is the last straw.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 22:17:47 UTC No. 16270839

>>16269072
dey jelly of da twerking magic

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 22:20:08 UTC No. 16270843

letting black and women into sciences was a mistake. they're just leeches and possibly detrimental to the pursue of human knowledge. is it a coincedence that science has been increasingly stagnant the more women and black allowed into academia? I think not. we most likely need a purge of those useless excrement from academia before any other breakthrough can be achieved.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 22:54:19 UTC No. 16270870

>>16268902
There is none. It's a journal for art degrees.
>quantitative or scientific articles fall outside the purview of the journal

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 23:42:04 UTC No. 16270923

>>16268780
Our Black queen is autistic about twerking. One more paper.

https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/ourj/vol5/iss1/3/

#RacialJusticeNow
#BlackLiberationNow
#NoFapNow

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 00:01:52 UTC No. 16270935

>>16268861
if they were brilliant they'd find a way in. politics is a part of life in every field out there and is a necessary skill

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 00:14:18 UTC No. 16270953

>>16268780
It's a hideously vulgar animalistic mating ritual. So of course feminists love it. It's also a great example of feminist hypocrisy, seeing how twerking is literally appropriating chimpanzee culture.