Image not available

720x707

1715924966357043.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16269264

Explain scientifically why smoking causes cancer.

Anonymous No. 16269270

>>16269264
Smoking does not in any way cause cancer. Smoking increases the chances of getting cancer. By a lot. It is best avoided.

Anonymous No. 16269271

>>16269264
>why is inhaling garbage humans haven't evolved to process bad for you
quite the high brow board if I dare say so myself

Anonymous No. 16269273

tfw no asian qt to smoke deathstix with

Anonymous No. 16269281

>>16269264
i am not a doctor, i took two semesters of biology in college against my will, but my understanding is that cigarette smoke is just very finely aerosolized tobacco bits, and this causes irritation to the mouth, throat, and lungs. this irritation is actually damage that the cells, and after a sufficiently long enough time or sufficiently bad luck, the cells repairing themselves can become damaged enough that they fuck up when trying to fix themselves and you get cancer

Anonymous No. 16269301

>>16269281
I didn't understand any of that you stupid soience moran

Anonymous No. 16269305

high rates of mitosis in lung tissues frequently create defective cells which can become cancerous. dozens of chemicals in cigarette smoke which aren't supposed to be in your lungs interfere with a cleaning process that would otherwise be effective at removing them.

Anonymous No. 16269306

>>16269301
smoke hurt body, body fucks up

Anonymous No. 16269316

>>16269306
What smoke? Like wildfire smoke? We don't ab have mab any deer here lab snab.

Anonymous No. 16269321

Because when you set something on fire, a lot of the products of combustion are truly carcinogenic.
How could breathing in carcinogens be bad for me lol???
Also your breathing gets impacted if you smoke enough and you feel like an asthmatic child every day, that can't be good for your heart.
Thankfully every drug that needed to be smoked can be eaten and / or vaporized now.

Anonymous No. 16269347

>>16269264
Cadmium in tobacco plants

Anonymous No. 16269358

>>16269264
benzopyrene is carcenogenous
(cannabis joints also produce benzopyrene, but thc has such anti-tumor effect, that those who smoke weed, but don't smoke tobacco, have lower chances of getting lung cancer than those who don't smoke either)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBqD_XHA_nI

Anonymous No. 16269460

>>16269281
> the cells repairing themselves can become damaged enough that they fuck up when trying to fix themselves and you get cancer
please explain in detail how this happens.

Anonymous No. 16269462

>>16269347
>>16269358
how do cadnium and benzopyrene cause cancer?

Image not available

342x316

1685982700801978.gif

sage No. 16269467

>>16269264
>smoking in 2024

Anonymous No. 16269470

>>16269467
I'm extremely attracted to girls with colored hair.

Anonymous No. 16269484

>>16269264
reactive chemicals in the smoke damage DNA, which makes cells behave in odd ways. usually the cells recover or die, but occasionally they start growing out of control.

Anonymous No. 16269488

>>16269467
Who is she?

Image not available

1080x1080

1702699055959490.jpg

Anonymous No. 16269489

>>16269467
Give me ONE reason why I shouldn't smoke.

Anonymous No. 16269493

>>16269489
Your teeth turn yellow and you reek like shit

Anonymous No. 16269500

>>16269489
1. Stinky.
2. Makes you seem low class/retarded.
3. Makes your teeth and nails yellow and disgusting.
4. Brings respiratory problems. Enjoy panting like a dog when you take a walk.
5. Expensive. If you smoke long enough you WILL inevitably start smoking a pack a day, which costs about $5-10 a day, which gets pretty expensive.
6. Makes you anxious when you haven't had a smoke in a while. Inconsistent mood.
7. Not allowed in a lot of places and countries.

Anonymous No. 16269501

>>16269264
>Explain scientifically why smoking causes cancer.
what is this, the 1950s all over again?
use the google, dummy

Anonymous No. 16269507

>>16269264
Smoking also raises your IQ. But I've come to realize that the negatives outweigh the IQ gains, and that's why I stopped smoking.

Anonymous No. 16269524

>>16269500
>>16269493
he said ONE dumbass, ergo you INSTANTLY lost this debate.

Anonymous No. 16269528

>>16269524
>debate
Watch out, we have a edgy philosophy major over here

Anonymous No. 16269530

>>16269528
>falling for the jewish school/college psyop
kek, enjoy being retarded. i learned the good old american way.

Anonymous No. 16269533

>>16269489
i stopped a couple of months ago and feeling physically better, i used to smoke monday to friday, and usually had bad migraine and nausea by the end of the week. After quitting that shit disappeared. Now i only smoke on some saturday nights and handle it like whisky, just once or twice a month, and on a "mesured" amount

Anonymous No. 16269587

>>16269273
This desu.

Anonymous No. 16269619

I can explain scientifically why smoking causes cancer, no problem.
First you explain to me how cancer cells develop on the body so I know we are on the same page

Image not available

498x498

1694846770380809.gif

Anonymous No. 16269669

>>16269493
>>16269500
So, you're saying if a cute girl offered a cig with her lipstick marks on it, you wouldn't smoke it?

Image not available

365x600

1694993299328806.jpg

Anonymous No. 16269678

>>16269619
>Cancer cells have gene mutations
>They divide out of control and don't die when they should
>They also ignore the immune system
That's all I know. But how does cigarette smoke mutate genes?

Anonymous No. 16269690

>>16269264
There are many carcinogens in tobacco smoke that are known to damage cell DNA, and if the tumor suppressor genes in DNA are damaged, it can lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation and cancer. Mutations in the TP53 gene are found in about half of all human cancers.

Smoking also suppresses the immune system, and the immune system is what essentially cleans up damaged cells.

>>16269270
Smoking absolutely causes cancer ya dimwit.

Image not available

600x300

Fig19_26_benzopyr....gif

Anonymous No. 16269842

>>16269462

Anonymous No. 16270163

>>16269669
Disgusting walking ashtray

Anonymous No. 16270278

>>16269264
explain why japan doesnt get cancer from smoking cigarettes

Anonymous No. 16270285

>>16269316
huh?

Anonymous No. 16270302

>>16269500
1. Subjective
2. You wouldnt know, but upper class people absolutely smoke
3. Not with proper care
4. Not if used in moderation
5a. Only if you are poor
5b. Not if used in moderation/you dont have the self control of a toddler
6. Only if you use it constantly, like an alcoholic has withdrawal
7. Rules are for peasants

Anonymous No. 16270310

>>16269842
decided to add the description:
> Mutagenesis by Bulky Addition Products
> Benzo(a)pyrene, a chemical produced by internal combusion engines and thus common in the environment, is not itself mutagenic. However, in the mammalian liver, benzo(a)pyrene is metabolized to diol epoxide, which binds covalently to guanine bases, preventing proper base pairing with cytosine bases. Bulky Addition Products such as diol epoxide or Aflatoxin B1 may result in depurination mutagenesis and are known to be carcinogens.
and smokers don't know why they're hated.
The funny thing is it doesn't even make them high.

Anonymous No. 16270324

>>16270302
>upper class people absolutely smoke
You probably know it from movies.
There are some scum in the upper class, but the trend is obvious: in russian prisons everybody smokes, and world leaders are almost never seen nervously clinging to a cigarette, I cannot even remember a photograph of them socially smoking. Some wannabe politicians, maybe, but not being stronger than their habit is not helping.
What will you do, if in some society you're forced to take your cigarette outside? Your habit would make you constantly humiliated. The shit they print on the cigarette packs only supports this claim that tobacco is a humiliation ritual (you may bully some weaker "friend" by smoking into his face, but in the end you're the bitch.

Anonymous No. 16270486

>>16270324
And you seem to be drawing conclusions about what politicians are doing based on well curated press photos.
Trust me, once theres wine behind closed doors, you will see them smoking.

Anonymous No. 16270559

>>16270486
>>16269678
>>16269669
>>16269524
>>16269489
>>16269273
Ciggy butt brain

Anonymous No. 16270657

>>16269489
>imagine the smell

Anonymous No. 16271253

>>16270657
Of the girl or the smoke?

Anonymous No. 16271260

>>16269264
>less hydrogen
>less oxygen
>less atp
>genes mutate more
>cell stops responding to environment
>cancer may develop

I'm joking, no one knows how cancer works. It is magic!

Anonymous No. 16271450

>>16269690
>Smoking absolutely causes cancer
no it doesn't
I can go smoke a cigarette right now and aftetwards I will with near certainty not have any form of detectable cancer.

Image not available

600x402

manhattan2_0.gif

Anonymous No. 16271851

>>16269501
Google is owned by the anti-nicotine lobby


By the way, pollution is good for you

Anonymous No. 16271874

>>16269460
>please explain in detail how this happens.
not him, but damage requires repair. Too much damage, gone on for too long, without being addressed, can lead to corrupted DNA inside of a cell. If a certain gene switch is flipped which regulates its reproductive cycle, then it will continually reproduce without stopping. If the DNA is corrupted and that gene that is telling it to replicate itself (or more likely a combination of genes) will no longer turn off, then it will just reproduce forever and keep growing and turn into a visible tumor. That's all cancer is, corrupted cells that never stop reproducing.

Anonymous No. 16271883

>>16269264
Radiation, faggot.

Image not available

640x360

bradford-hill-cri....jpg

Anonymous No. 16271895

>>16271450
It's true that most smokers won't develop cancer, though many die relatively young from other smoking-related conditions like COPD and CVD.
It's also true that most people who develop lung cancer aren't smokers.

However
Smokers have a 25x higher risk of developing lung cancer than non-smokers.
Read about the Bradford Hill criteria

Anonymous No. 16271941

>>16271895
>It's also true that most people who develop lung cancer aren't smokers.
>Smokers have a 25x higher risk of developing lung cancer than non-smokers.
These numbers do not add up to this one:
> An estimated 1.3 billion people worldwide use tobacco products, 80% of whom are in low- and middle-income countries.

Anonymous No. 16271989

>>16271941
Non sequitar

Anonymous No. 16272037

>>16271989
Considering how many people smoke tobacco, there's no way that most people who develop lung cancer are not smokers, if smokers have 25x higher risk of developing lung cancer than non-smokers.

Anonymous No. 16272172

>>16272037
Retard take

Anonymous No. 16272180

>>16272172
how so? did they count those late stage cancer patients to whom doctors prohibited to smoke as non-smokers?

Anonymous No. 16272249

>>16271989
You will never be European

Anonymous No. 16272259

>>16269264
>Explain scientifically why smoking causes cancer.
When an individual smokes, they are breathing in a mixture of molecules. These dissolve into the surfactant coating the surface of the lung and then pass through into the blood.
The nicotine which enters the blood goes to the brain and binds certain cell-surface protein receptors, leading to the pleasurable effects of smoking.
Many of the other molecules in the blood, from the cigarette, enter cells and undergo chemical reactions with DNA to form DNA adducts (a form of DNA damage).
This DNA damage can lead to cells becoming cancerous, by interfering with genes coding for things like tumor suppressor proteins (such as p53, which is found to be mutated in >50% of cancers)

Image not available

780x1133

who research on c....jpg

Anonymous No. 16272267

Tin foil hat hypotheses: Most of the harmful effects come from all the chemicals and additives. Cancer didn't rise until cigarettes stated being mass produced.
Bigger tin foil hat hypothesis: Cancer started spiking after the nuclear tests through the 1950s and the government picked big tobacco as a scapegoat.

I smoke organic additive free tobacco and I roll it in unbleached rice gum, and even then it's only 1 or 2 a week.

Anonymous No. 16272326

>>16270310
ok.

how does this get into a cell nucleus.

and which genetic mutations does it cause?

and how do each of those cause cancer?

Anonymous No. 16272532

>>16269301
you are the reason I keep coming back to 4chan

Anonymous No. 16272533

>>16269316
>We don't ab have mab any deer here lab snab.
Of course

Anonymous No. 16272535

>>16269271
>haven't evolved to process
Wildfires break out all the time and have for all of history much of which humans spent huddled around camp fires, so of course humans have evolved to inhale smoke.

Anonymous No. 16272577

>>16269264
Read a book

Anonymous No. 16272591

Glad to see /sci/ hivemind has prevailed with my 4chan benzopyrenes hypothesis over the reddit DUDE TOBACCO HAS RADIOACTIVE SHIT IN IT AT 1PPT (despite all other plants and bioaccumulation of animal meat having this at far greater quantities and much more likely to be taken up by the body when ingested orally). On the bright side, smooth brains, avoiding first pass metabolism by inhalation of the benzypyrenes is ironically much less carcinogenic than eating them so in reality the bigger take away should be that you shouldn't oversear your meat and don't eat anything heavily burnt like blackened toast or burned pizza.

Anonymous No. 16272922

>>16269462
Because they re carcinogenic

Image not available

846x960

1635719634855.jpg

Anonymous No. 16272964

>>16269264
my neighbour her grandfather smoked and he died of lung cancer

Unironically, anecdotal evidence is the only way to prove something scientifically.

>chemicals in tobacco are known to have caused uncontroled cell growth in vitro and in vivo.
>all people investigated have the aforementioned cells in their body
>all cigaretts contain the aforementioned chemicals
>many people who smoke died from cancer.
yet we do not know if OP will get cancer if he decides to smoke.

why?
>OP is a faggot and might die from AIDS before cancer gets him

Anonymous No. 16272981

>>16269489
No, please go ahead

Anonymous No. 16273752

>>16269489
It's cringe

Anonymous No. 16273850

>>16269690
No, he had right. Smoking does not cause cancer. It only increases the likelihood of cancer. Many people will never get cancer no matter how hard they try.

Anonymous No. 16273857

>>16269264
it incites cell growth which causes cancer

Anonymous No. 16273867

>>16269305
why does cigarette smoke damage cells more than walking down a busy street?

Anonymous No. 16273868

>>16269264
probably something to do with free radicals, take your anti-oxidants anon