Image not available

333x500

9783540813415-us-....jpg

๐Ÿงต EVIL books

Anonymous No. 16269317

post math or science books that traumatized you

Anonymous No. 16269322

blackhadard C*algebras

Image not available

827x1251

top.jpg

Anonymous No. 16269330

Idk this approach seemed unnatural to me at first.

Anonymous No. 16269345

>>16269330
I've heard this book contains a lot of mistakes.

Anonymous No. 16269360

>>16269330
Just use Spanier for regular algebraic topology then use Whitehead for homotopy theory.

Image not available

1000x1000

42965a9e-f2c5-411....jpg

Anonymous No. 16269514

Schaum's Elementary Algebra.

Anonymous No. 16269569

>>16269317
lol I'm trying to get through this one. It is a struggle after the first chapter. He literally has a single section of a chapter on Kan extensions, and doesn't actually say what a Kan extension is lmao.

Anonymous No. 16270004

>>16269514
just read lang

Image not available

549x788

schlop schlop sch....jpg

Anonymous No. 16270617

>>16269317
This and Composition Operators by Cowen/MacCluer

Image not available

827x1254

978-3-662-04687-6.jpg

Anonymous No. 16271193

>>16269317

Anonymous No. 16271198

>>16269317
i can't think of a book that traumatised me, but in my college days studying for the topology exam traumatised me

Anonymous No. 16271218

>>16269317
any books with words

the feels, all the feels
I can't feel them anymore

>tfw can't even read

Anonymous No. 16271486

>>16269317
>>16269330
>>16271193
how come all the evil books have *that* cover?

Anonymous No. 16271557

>>16271486
They're for post-graduate students. Since most people here haven't advanced beyond basic algebra, it's evil.

Image not available

312x445

31ja6U08zCL._SY44....jpg

Anonymous No. 16272091

shit's fukkin' hard yo

Anonymous No. 16272401

>>16272091
Based. Literally the first section he's talking about jets without ever introducing them.

Anonymous No. 16272559

>>16269317
The whole openstax math series:
>1000 pages each
>60% are just fool-proof exercises
>sometimes reasoning is bullshit
>half of each book is a review of the same topics you met in the last book + something added they could compress in a single book instead of studying 3 times the same topic
>graphing, linear equations and systems come before polynomials
This shit confuses and angers me, are math books all the same?

Anonymous No. 16272638

>>16272559
Nah that one is just especially shit. Read Amann Escher's Analysis series. Does calc and analysis in one and has genuinely interesting exercises. No prerequisites

Anonymous No. 16274618

>>16269317
Nobody cares idiot