Image not available

1024x892

frog_smoke2.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Evolution by random mutation and natural selection is fake and gay in complex speices

Anonymous No. 16270532

DNA does not exist in a vacuum. All shitty mutations are either fatal or meaningless noises for natural selection. You can't plug a fertilized egg with DNA of an ape into an elephant to get an infant ape out. The language subtrate maybe universal but the way to interpret the language isn't. It depends on the spieces and also on the invididual. if you plant an egg that was ferterlized into the womb of another surrogate mother, the child that come out will be slightly different from the one that would come out of the original mother. in extreme case of the planaria worm, their DNA is so buggy and shitty that most of their individual characteristic and fitness actually depend on how the individual "fix" their own DNA expression instead of the DNA itself. the DNA almost become useless and natural selection works on the individual level instead of the DNA.
evolution by random mutation of DNA and RNA might have been important for living being that are simpler, such as bacteria and viruses. however, they're almost noises in more complex species. hence, evolution of species like humans and apes not only depend on the random mutation of DNA but also the experience of the invididual changing the way their body interpret the universal language that is DNA. we can observe this in individual over their lifetime. probably this even has greater effect on selection than some shitty random minute DNA mutations.

Anonymous No. 16270539

Anyone notice how christtrannies are desperate to salvage their ideology come here to try and reaffirm the bible? Theyโ€™ve got like 20 differents points the need to debunk before god becomes real or something. Kinda funny to them scramble about here everyday.

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16270540

>>16270539
>bring christniggers into the table.
nice red herring retard.

Anonymous No. 16270543

I reccomend retards to watch this episode from Michael Levin from the planaria worm before talking shit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGrHLVW_jao

Anonymous No. 16270544

>>16270532
>You can't plug a fertilized egg with DNA of an ape into an elephant to get an infant ape out. The language subtrate maybe universal but the way to interpret the language isn't
If I'm reading this right, you're saying you can't take the DNA from an elephant and put it into and ape zygote. Sorry, but you can. Other species DNA are spliced into mice all the time to test their functions.
The rest of your post seems to be lamarckism or maybe epigenetic something. Epigenetics are real

Anonymous No. 16270545

>>16270544
No, you can't plug a fertilized ape egg into an elphant to get an ape out.

Anonymous No. 16270547

>>16270544
>lamarckism or maybe epigenetic something
lamarckism and epigenetic are both real. new retards provide evidences for both. the close minded retards wanted to close the book on evolution because of christniggers so if you published about those topics a few years or decade ago they would look at you funny and you lose your career but the acdemia is so fake and gay nowadays they can't control the narrative anymore.

Anonymous No. 16270665

>>16270545
>embryos of the species Spanish ibex are aborted when inserted alone into the womb of a goat, but when introduced together with a goat embryo, they may develop to term

>Goat fetuses have likewise been successfully grown in sheep wombs by enveloping the goat inner cell mass in sheep trophoblast.

>mares and donkeys have been shown to be capable of carrying to term a range of true, xenogeneic extraspecies pregnancies created by embryo transfer, including Przewalski's horse and Grant's zebra

>In conclusion, our results suggest that 1) giant panda somatic cell nuclei can dedifferentiate in enucleated rabbit oocytes; 2) interspecies cloned panda-rabbit embryos can implant in the uterus of a third species, the domestic cat; and 3) mitochondria from donor cells may gradually substitute those from recipient oocytes in interspecies cloned embryos.

Anonymous No. 16270703

>>16270665
those don't deny anything I've said about interpretation of the DNA unless you're a retard that don't understand logic.
again, these are exactly the proof that the interpretation of the individual of the DNA matters for reproduction. the fact that you can't just plug a fucking ape DNA into an elephant but you can plug DNA of similar almost essentially the same species prove just that.

Anonymous No. 16270712

also the fact the hybrids between similar species but swapped sex of parents exhibit different characteristics is very telling that the body of the female interpret the dna differently. lion and tiger can mate to create liger or tigon. one of them is is bigger and the other is smaller than both parents. one can possibly be fertile and the other one is not.

Anonymous No. 16270762

>>16270712
ban all ESLs from /sci/

Image not available

1024x1018

retard_absorber.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16270821

>>16270762
nigger you are so inherently intellectually disabled and low in self esteem and self respect you would rather play dirty instead of refuting other people main point.

Image not available

828x1792

IMG_0690.png

Stop guessing start learning No. 16271025

>>16270532
Yes anon the brainwashed are hostile to any criticism to their scientific religion, however to Dismiss evolutionary biology outright is also dumb. Iโ€™m a creationist
Myself and believe In god. But Iโ€™m not going to say the science is completely wrong just a lot of parts of it are delusional.

The pic is spot on

Anonymous No. 16271481

>>16271025
Evolution has been directly observed

Anonymous No. 16271510

>>16270539
I see the pattern now: just like the ''radical extreme right-wing conspiracy theorist' anti-vaxer meme'' there's an organized effort to discourage any discussion about any kind of status quo. What a sick world we live in.

Anonymous No. 16271602

Can you re-enable all the retroviruses in your DNA for me? I'd rather not have you alive to post anymore if you think DNA doesn't affect the individual more than the individual affects DNA

Anonymous No. 16271607

>>16271025
How do you figure the more advanced trait came to be if not mutation and selection? Why does the 10th generation have a longer tail than the 1st?

Anonymous No. 16271660

>>16270539
They are also spamming /x/, /his/, and probably more boards I don't know about. They are in desperate need for a containment board.

Anonymous No. 16271727

>>16270821
There's no real "main point" when someone is just rambling in broken English.

For instance the "main point" of this post
>>16270712
Is just wrong.

Anonymous No. 16271960

>>16271510
>there's an organized effort to discourage any discussion about any kind of status quo
no, there's an organize effort to be absolutely fed up and saturated with these threads that keep on repeating themselves about things that should be obvious to anyone by now.