Image not available

499x750

1638141155691.jpg

๐Ÿงต Wholeness vs unitism

Anonymous No. 16270608

I know that I swore off math because it was killing my youth, but I just can but to be utterly bewitched by her charm.
But I really cannot help but to take an opportunity to shit on set theory and all cope theorists out there. You might know me as the famous and well known discoverer/inventor of Hitomi's number, Hitomi analysis, Lain point theory, solver of the crux problem, savior of real numbers, monad theory, ouroboros monad theory, fractal ouroboros monad theory, and yes the one that mathematically proved the existence of god... not necessarily a Christian god, and also gassy sets.
Lately I had been taking on a more greek approach to things. I realized that set theory is so fucking limiting that I would have never thought about the radii of numbers. This was one of the things I was talking about when I was developing lain point theory and how math is really just this misunderstanding within our minds of a far too fundamental process. Math is somehow both fundamental and transcendent; fundamentally transcendent. Set theory is an utter crutch to mathematical thinking. While yes low grade schizophrenia did deform my mind it deformed outward where as set theory will deform inwards leading to atrophy of a mathematical spiritus.

Anonymous No. 16270609

I'm much better now. Man was not mean to chase after infinities and know gods, but yet I had and it crippled me.
I will say now more than ever the purpose of lain paint theory was just to make a simple analog that is appropriate for converting to the form of figure. It is a far closer cousin to graph theory than anything else.
So here is a greek perspective of hitomi theory: If hitomi's number is a circle than in a dimensionless form the radius is hitomi's number so all finite numbers in the naturals lie in the center point. And crux number that represent irrational/transcendentals are in the positive area.
In this analogy it's all there, everything I've talked about is there in this wholistic idea.
But this leads to the difference between one while and one unit.
One unit is different and exists in distinction, a whole does not.
This debate could not possibly be solved with set theory.

Image not available

1024x576

IMG_5565.jpg

Anonymous No. 16270632

Anonymous No. 16270633

>>16270632
>just kill your mathematical spiritus bro
no thanks