Image not available

3072x2048

F0187830-Black_ho....jpg

๐Ÿงต Something impossible to know

Anonymous No. 16271397

Say me something you think that
No Matter how advance we are we're never gonna know

Anonymous No. 16271434

>>16271397
a machine that can solve the halting problem.

sage No. 16271443

>>16271397
I think that we are destined to know everything. Remember that from nothing (literally nothing, no instructions, no outside help), humans are now able to know the fundamental structure of matter. Absolutely nothing is impossible. All we need is the will.

Anonymous No. 16271449

>>16271397
Consciousness
Simulation theory
Alternate universes
Boltzmann brains
These prove that humans will never know everything

Anonymous No. 16271470

>>16271443
>Absolutely nothing is impossible
Can we make A equal precisely and only A and simultaneously A equal something other than A?

Anonymous No. 16271478

>>16271470
Yes. A = 0 = 1 != A

Anonymous No. 16271491

>>16271449
So you're unconscius right now?

Anonymous No. 16271500

>>16271491
Is how they live

On perpetual contradiction

Anonymous No. 16271791

>>16271397
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems

Anonymous No. 16271800

>>16271397
the existence of parallel universes. you need to move faster than light in a certain type of wormhole to see they exist

Anonymous No. 16271802

>>16271449
Consciousness can definitely be recreated from first principles eventually. it'll probably take awhile though

Anonymous No. 16271807

>>16271397
What the pre-big bang cosmology looked like.

Anonymous No. 16271809

>>16271397
Hard to say. If we can't perform supertasks, then Chaitin's constant for sure at least. If we *can* perform supertasks, dunno - but those would be damn interesting questions for sure.

Anonymous No. 16272085

>>16271443
We don't know the fundamental structure of matter. The only people pretending we do are trying to sell you something or convince you to find their collider. Don't buy their bullshit.

Anonymous No. 16272088

>>16271802
Absolutely it cannot. No matter what principles you use, consciousness will be needed to verify whether consciousness exists. It will be circular and some axiomatic untestable assumptions will always be present, as we have no external validity test for consciousness that does not also rely on a notion of consciousness itself.

Anonymous No. 16272109

>>16271397
I just want to know why how we exist, what was before all this and if this is the only "time" that we existed. There's a high chance it's impossible know, since we can be limited by physics like going faster than speed of light which is literally impossible.

Anonymous No. 16272395

>>16271434
the halting problem can already be solved for most algorithms.

Anonymous No. 16272400

Why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch?

Anonymous No. 16272406

>>16272400
Fuck off, this is a thread for intellecturals

Anonymous No. 16272425

>>16271397
Why is OP such a massive faggot

Anonymous No. 16272518

>>16271791
Nonexistence implies there's nothing to know

Anonymous No. 16272711

>>16271397
>Say me something
English, apparently

Anonymous No. 16273931

>>16271397
Say me... say you

Anonymous No. 16274045

>>16271449
No, that is all popsci fantasy, you only need uncertainty and incompleteness to prove that.

Anonymous No. 16274053

>>16272400
One, two, threehee *crunch*

Anonymous No. 16274274

>>16271397
If you find something where you last look, why can't you just look there first?

Anonymous No. 16274278

>>16272088
That is a false problem. We know that we are conscious and so can verify consciousness when it exists in something else.

Image not available

3850x1925

scale of the univ....jpg

Anonymous No. 16274831

>>16271397
>If the Big Bang ever actually happened or not
>If the universe as a whole is actually expanding or has a boundary

Anonymous No. 16275194

>>16272395
No it cannot