Image not available

405x854

Screenshot (531).png

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต How can intelligent people in STEM believe?

Anonymous No. 16274170

Anyone else get bothered when religious people into stem? Like, how the fuck can you be a rational empirical scientist but then abandon the scientific method when convienient to you?

Anonymous No. 16274177

>>16274170
>no real downsides in believing something
>all the (psychological) benefits
I wonder why, it's like most religion would make you a dysfunctional ascete that refuses to eat or work. The brain is a "BS machine" so complete coherence isn't priority in the slightest (see split brain research).

Anonymous No. 16274180

>>16274177
It's not like*

Anonymous No. 16274183

Philosophy threads are off-topic here.
Take your gnostic atheist to:
>>>/x/

Anonymous No. 16274199

>>16274177
but scientists are supposed to use empiricism and actual evidence. thats why i left my phd advisor

Anonymous No. 16274227

>>16274199
> to use empiricism and actual evidence.
For their job. They're humans.

Anonymous No. 16274228

>>16274170
kek

Image not available

200x188

1718544057885147.jpg

Anonymous No. 16274230

>>16274170
Based reddit post

Anonymous No. 16274233

>>16274227
so you go to work and believe that things are demonstrated by the scientific method but turn this off randomly for the rest of your life? isnt that contradictory/hypocritical? and nonsensical

Anonymous No. 16274237

>>16274199
how can you know it wont interfere with their work? what if they have something come up in the lab that contradicts their religion?

Anonymous No. 16274240

>>16274170
>How can intelligent people in STEM believe?
they can't. religion in the modern world is just a larp. the only people who are genuinely religious in the 21st century are illiterate brown and black people.

Image not available

737x1088

IMG_0704.jpg

Stop guessing start learning No. 16274246

>>16274170
Iโ€™m in STEM and I would be considered religious because I believe in god. Nothing wrong with religion. Newton was religious and created calculus discovered the laws of gravity and motion. Faraday was religious and discovered induction for electricity. Heโ€™s the reason we have modern electricity.

Stop being ignorant.

Religion means jack shit as far as performance.

Anonymous No. 16274248

>>16274233
>isnt that contradictory/hypocritical?
see
>The brain is a "BS machine" so complete coherence isn't priority in the slightest (see split brain research).

As long as their research/works follows the scientific method the rest doesn't matter. The good part is its iterative critic, subdivision and being limited to specific issues, the personal-side is mostly meaningless in the long run.

Anonymous No. 16274253

>>16274170
It bothers me when atheists think they're intelligent.
>question things
this never happens
>don't accept assertions without evidence
definitely never happens

Anonymous No. 16274254

>>16274246
You're a creationist and cited a Jew femoid

Anonymous No. 16274260

>>>/his/16836483

Image not available

828x1792

IMG_0768.png

Stop guessing start learning No. 16274261

>>16274248
The scientific method was created by religion dumbass. Even Richard Dawkins an atheist fucking admits this

Anonymous No. 16274266

>>16274254
Abiogenesis is not science.

Anonymous No. 16274268

>>16274266
nobody cares incel