Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 12:36:19 UTC No. 16275921

>>16275910
Jews.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 14:40:55 UTC No. 16276051

>>16275910
Clearly the problem is decimals. Just use binary.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 14:44:05 UTC No. 16276055

>>16275910
b-b-but 81 is larger than 9...

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:31:06 UTC No. 16276093

>>16276051
desimals*

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:37:34 UTC No. 16276099

Desimal? What the fuck is that you esl shitskin?

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:56:07 UTC No. 16276108

>>16275910
do we just have to believe everything they teach us in school?
you cant really know anything for sure so...

🗑️ Barkon Approved Post at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:06:27 UTC No. 16276112

>>16276108
This is a troll board, and people get mad when you don't accept their crew. It's called being an academic troll lord. Don't expect a perfect response to your genuine query, but you are right - we shouldn't.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:42:32 UTC No. 16276153

>>16275910
This is why we need eugenics.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:19:47 UTC No. 16276283

>>16275910
It's the influence of the colored arrows. Take them away, and the results will change to the correct numbers.
t. dyscalculiac mathematician

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 20:00:12 UTC No. 16276405

>>16275910
2x2 doesn't give a larger decimals, the amount of 10s there is 0

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 21:50:29 UTC No. 16276607

>Your response?
Base-ω resolves the paradox.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 22:23:38 UTC No. 16276638

>>16275910
>Your response?
This was written by an ESL and thus is discarded.

Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 01:41:16 UTC No. 16278112

>>16275910
This is why addition is superior
1+1=2. Bigger digit
3+6=9. Bigger digit
4+3=7. Bigger digit
It's always a bigger digit!

Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 13:59:21 UTC No. 16278763

>>16275910

What is this even supposed to proof? Getting desperate to do something smart, anon?

26×26=676
Result is larger, 6 is bigger than 2

27×27=729
Result is even larger, 7 is bigger than 2

29×29=841
Result is even larger as well, 8 is bigger than 2

Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 15:24:59 UTC No. 16278869

2-4
3-9
4-16
5-25
6-36
7-49
8-64

What is this nonsense. Hello god fix your code11!!!1
9-81

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 04:22:57 UTC No. 16279852

>>16275910
I only count in binary

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 04:29:31 UTC No. 16279856

>>16276112
kill yourself worthless namefag