Image not available

1549x2105

Marie_Curie_c._19....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16277543

>be a woman
>Marry up to competent borderline genius scientist(Pierre Curie)
>Be his assistant in lab
>He received nobel prize but was a complete cuck and forced Committee to give her nobel prize too
>Work more as assistant of husband
>Husband dies in car incident, but most of essential work is done
>Complete the rest
>Get nobel
Wymen in science moment. And feminists call her icon of female superiority in science

Anonymous No. 16277546

>>16277543
>Marie Curie is a DEI Nobel laureate
Never change /sci/

Anonymous No. 16277557

didn't realize the dei tendrils spanned so far back. academia has been dead for a while

Anonymous No. 16277560

>>16277546
There were active mass suffrage movements in all nordic countries at that time

Anonymous No. 16277562

Is it really the case that people go on about her specifically because she isn't as weird and obviously autistic or unwomanlike as the other women who actually demonstrated serious ability to innovate intellectually? Like, I've never heard of a feminist bring up Emmy Noether.

Anonymous No. 16277594

>>16277562
They don't want to admit that being very smart is a masculine trait. Same reason they would worship and lie about Lamar(who didn't invent wife) and ada lovelance(her first program couldn't have worked on baggage machine and had many errors) instead of grace hopper(who was more of a administrative boss of engineers than a real brain behind firstcompiler. But at least she contributed more to actual shit)

Anonymous No. 16277601

>>16277594
>invent wife
*Wifi

Anonymous No. 16277609

>>16277594
Why are blacks and women treated the same?

Anonymous No. 16277617

>>16277609
wdym?

Anonymous No. 16277646

>>16277543
If she were that smart, she would have hypothesized that highly energetic physical processes have deleterious effects on biological systems, and used radiation shielding.

Anonymous No. 16277742

>>16277546
>>16277543
Similar story with Ada Lovelace, she was Charles Babbage's oneitis and he pestered her sharing his ideas on computing

Anonymous No. 16277809

>>16277646
True and real.
/thread

Anonymous No. 16277811

>>16277543
It was a horse drawn carriage you rodent

Anonymous No. 16277823

>>16277617
they constantly lie about their actual ability and grossly inflate what achievements have been made then they blame their low performance on normal men

Anonymous No. 16277824

Nobody is surprised that women can achieve great things. I'm not anyway. Also, everyone knows who marie curie is they taught us this in middle school in the 90s.
What bothers me is that I went to a uni that was 2/3rds women, yet none of my classes after sophomore year had more than one woman, most none. If they want the engineering / science jobs maybe they shouldn't go into theater or nutritional studies. I totally know they can do it but for whatever reason they don't go into eng / sci.

Anonymous No. 16277875

>>16277824
>Nobody is surprised that women can achieve great things.
Except that they don't. It speaks volumes that the best case of a "great" woman physicist was the wife of an actual physicist who won a Nobel Prize 113 years ago. The useful work she did was mostly as an assistant, and she died prematurely as a result of incompetently dicking around with radioactive materials despite the fact that it was known even early on that they were dangerous. Can you name one equation that Marie Curie came up with?
>If they want the engineering / science jobs maybe they shouldn't go into theater or nutritional studies. I totally know they can do it but for whatever reason they don't go into eng / sci.
None of them can do it, but women are ego-driven narcissists and they all want to imagine that they can be bossgirl scientists jUsT LiKe mEn... it's all so very tiresome.

Anonymous No. 16277952

>>16277562
>Emmy Noether.
Jew

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16277972

>>16277875
>Can you name one equation that Marie Curie came up with?
Nigger reasoning. You're dumb as fuck.

Anonymous No. 16278082

>>16277875
>Can you name one equation that Marie Curie came up with?
Expecting of a chemist to produce significant equations in physics

Anonymous No. 16278095

>>16277972
>Nigger reasoning. You're dumb as fuck.
Not at all. Compare Curie, for example, to Henry Moseley, who scientific career spanned a mere TWO years around the same period in which he worked out the mathematical relationship between the wavelengths of x-rays and atomic numbers, founding the entire field of x-ray crystallography, which allowed scientists to determine the atomic and molecular structure of materials without using chemistry; literally one of the greatest fundamental advances in science, worked out by a young man in his twenties in a period of less than two years. No Nobel Prize for Moseley though.
>>16278082
Then maybe they shouldn't be called physicists and shouldn't be awarded Nobel Prizes for their shitty work.

Anonymous No. 16278140

>>16278082
>chemist
>Gets nobel in physics
>No equations

Anonymous No. 16278147

>>16278140
>300k starting

Image not available

720x406

bfun.png

Anonymous No. 16278174

>>16277543
>be womyn
>color shader bars on GUI
>literally single-handedly discover blackhole
Why are woman just better?

Image not available

366x360

download (2).jpg

Anonymous No. 16278177

>>16278174
There was an entire team behind that jewess, mostly all men, she received that title because of nepotism.
Also
>Black holes and their locations were found before her
>Planetary telescope that was used was constructed and designed by men
>Most of the work was done by a team anyway

Image not available

640x734

hmbz.png

Anonymous No. 16278179

>>16278177
Why the gynophobia?

Anonymous No. 16278188

When Pierre died she went and fucked and sucked Paul Langevin, who was married

Anonymous No. 16278192

>>16277594
>her first program couldn't have worked on baggage machine and had many errors

I was basically told the opposite and that it was flawless and that this demonstrated her competence. It's obvious that, were she a man, nobody would now know or care about her at all, and it's only because she happened to be in a position to technically write the first program, and also be a woman, that people took advantage of that to push her as a "woman who did something first".

It's honestly patronizing and frankly offensive to the woman who have been capable of meaningful accomplishments and innovation to hold up these 'minor' woman as being actually the greatest there ever was. I mean, it would be perfectly respectable to look at someone like Barbara Liskov and use her as an example for women in computing and software, but nobody does and all the major popular "woman in x" are essentially toy examples.

I mean hell look as something like gaming. Did you know that most of the best levels in the original Tomb Raider were designed by a woman? You'd think that the game would be seen as some kind of feminist masterpiece, showing that "women can make the best games", especially given how female it actual fanbase leans, by no, for whatever reason the marketing gave the impression it was focused in tits and guns and so always has almost the opposite reputation.

Anonymous No. 16278200

>>16278192
>ADTs were first proposed by Barbara Liskov and Stephen N. Zilles
>Stephen N. Zilles don't even has a Wikipedia page unlike Barbara

Anonymous No. 16278204

>>16278200
You don't understand. Academia don't need another man, it needs more women

Anonymous No. 16278290

>>16277742
>oneitis
Any evidences?

Anonymous No. 16278363

>>16277543
>Get nobel
totally deserved it.
now go get your own, you bitter incel loser.

Anonymous No. 16278390

>>16278363
That lobotomy guy also deserved it?

Anonymous No. 16278576

>>16278363
Tell me u are a cuck without telling me it. Or a woman same things

Anonymous No. 16278725

>>16277543
>Get nobel
You're so envious, you sad, bitter incel.
Seek therapy, don't waste another decade like that.

Anonymous No. 16278790

>>16278363
>>16278725
Cucks are everywhere...

Anonymous No. 16278808

>>16277543
Marie Curie = MERCURY
It's just symbolism for those with eyes to see and ears to hear.

Image not available

741x643

iq-by-college-maj....png

Anonymous No. 16278934

>>16278808

Anonymous No. 16279113

>>16278934
Jung has a book called Man and his Symbols.
If you don't realize that the powers that be drive narrative and tip their hat via symbolism, then you are missing basically everything.
Watch an grand opening ceremony of anything and explain it via logic and science.

You are ruled by people that tell you what is really going on, or at least what's not, via symbolism.
Let me guess, you took the vaxx, and also MUH INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME is your excuse?

Anonymous No. 16279180

>>16279113
Wtf r u talking about

Anonymous No. 16279185

>>16278934
There are less than 10% female working in my sub-discipline and like 5% if we get very granular. Does this mean we are geniuses?

Anonymous No. 16279250

>>16279113
>If you don't realize that the powers that be drive narrative and tip their hat via symbolism,
Do you think these people are smart to notice anything or are just inductees of some sect and get spoonfed all the shiboleths?
For some time now i have conviced myself that secret societies and nepotism rings only get powerful if they capture the government. A nepotism ring taken to its extreme is just a gypsy camp.
Imagine if these jews actually acted like isolationist racists that only hire each other and buy and sell from each other like they pretend they are, instead of globetrotters that capture governments

Image not available

750x654

1713658991381659.jpg

Anonymous No. 16279549

>>16277546
>Marie Curie is a DEI Nobel laureate
This, but unironically.

Anonymous No. 16279554

>>16277543
Marie Curie didn't earn her science accomplishments. She was given it just because she was a woman. In fucking 1915.

You guys are stupid as dirt.

Anonymous No. 16279562

>God you guise are stupid. They wouldn't have given her special advantages just for inclusion. Next you'll be saying the women's suffrage movement existed by 1915.

Image not available

500x500

51gQ6V247IL._UXNa....jpg

Anonymous No. 16279604

>>16277609

Anonymous No. 16279865

>>16279185
Blue collar workers became smarter than white collar. Interesting why?

Anonymous No. 16279974

>>16279554
Yes.
Her accomplishments are shit. She was just in a lab. Her job of discovering elements was easy as fuck given the new tools she was given.
Oh oh hes rock sample #6825, does it make the geiger counter beep? Yes? Prepare it for chemical breakdown. Oh, what a feast of intellect. Thank you Pierre, the love of my life

Anonymous No. 16280053

Alright you've done curie
now try franklin

Anonymous No. 16280101

>>16277562
>actually demonstrated serious ability to innovate intellectually?
404

Anonymous No. 16280137

>>16279113
jung was a german bourgeois, ie a sex addict who took his brain poops for the truth

Anonymous No. 16280139

>>16277562
>I've never heard of a feminist bring up Emmy Noether.
Curie won a Nobel prize, Noether didn't. Also, Noether's work is too technical for feminists to understand.

Anonymous No. 16280291

>>16280053
Any person with critical thinking could determine that fallacy without any threads

Anonymous No. 16280302

>>16279865
I'm actually not blue collar. I just work in the pajeet/chang sausagefest to end them all. I was mostly making a joke about the data I was replying to. I would really doubt the causation runs that way.

Anonymous No. 16280359

>>16280302
What discipline are you?

Anonymous No. 16280364

>>16277557
have sex

Anonymous No. 16280372

>>16279180
Exactly.
Normies will never and they will take the next vaxx too even if it's called "scam dangerous vaxx".
Thick skulls.

Anonymous No. 16280373

>>16279250
I think people that think it's all Jews afe as stupid as they come.
Your premise betrays quite a bit along with your possible assumption that this was my premise.

Anonymous No. 16280626

>>16278934
Women...

Anonymous No. 16280729

>>16280359
An analog electronics subfield.

Anonymous No. 16280879

>>16277594
No program works the first time and especially not the first program ever, particularly one that was reasonably complicated as Lovelace's was.

Anonymous No. 16280934

>>16280729
fleshlight pcb maker?

Anonymous No. 16280941

>>16280934
I wish. How do I break into the fleshlight design segment?

Anonymous No. 16281042

>>16280729
What does it do?

Anonymous No. 16281043

>>16277543
That's a cute love story, Pierre sounds like a based dude

Anonymous No. 16281269

>>16281043
*idiot and cuck

Anonymous No. 16281297

>>16277594
It's pretty sad that the Hopper number has fallen out of usage. I'm still proud mine is 2 since my best instructor studied directly from one of Hopper's personal proteges. Excuse me while I date myself here.

Anonymous No. 16281315

>>16281297
>Excuse me while I date myself here.
What?

Anonymous No. 16281473

>>16280373
Why are you focusing on that specific part of everything i wrote? Hit a nerve eh? Fucking kike

Anonymous No. 16281601

>>16277543
Being a cuck is a trait only men have issues with
But they are quick to sweep their submissive sexual habits into the closet if it means to preserve a face

Anonymous No. 16282038

>>16281601
>Being a cuck is a trait only men have issues with
so most normal people?

Anonymous No. 16282266

She had a goood puusy I guess

Anonymous No. 16282533

>>16280364
Rip off ur dick

Anonymous No. 16282647

>>16277543
Curie bros we got too cocky

Anonymous No. 16282713

You guys are fucking assholes.

She literally died from poking at radiated shit and even her diary is like a goddamn witch’s grimoire because it will kill you if you touch it or something.

Anonymous No. 16282716

>>16282713
> muh I wanted it the whole 35 years but didn't like it when it happened.

Anonymous No. 16282720

She was in the photo with Einstein and Schrödinger and the rest

Literally the only woman too

You’re all just mad pissy baby boys mad a woman did a thing lmfao

Anonymous No. 16282738

>>16282720
What she did exactly? Explored another radioactive element number 5?

Anonymous No. 16282762

>>16277543
OP is discord troon btw.
xhe posted same thing there.

Anonymous No. 16283121

>>16282762
Link?

Anonymous No. 16283128

>>16277562
Probably because she was a communist. We know how amerimutts, be it ass or elephant, prefer to minimize their contributions

Anonymous No. 16283528

>>16277546
>>Marie Curie is a DEI Nobel laureate
Yes, that's true unironically

Image not available

1280x720

curie.png

Anonymous No. 16283745

>>16282720

Anonymous No. 16283751

>>16277543
>Husband dies in car incident, but most of essential work is done
>Complete the rest
>Get nobel
Well deserved. I wish I had such an assistant. You wouldn't even get his (or my) stuff; and normal woman wouldn't even care.

Anonymous No. 16283934

>>16277543
>>Hurr durr women=bad

If the competent borderline genius scientist thinks someone deserves credit it is for good reason.

Anonymous No. 16283937

>>16283934
Genius in on field /= genius in all fields. Most scientists are normies or retards with higher iq

Anonymous No. 16284090

>>16277646
At the time there wasn't a lot of good means of protection.
Fermi used to sprint back and forth across his lab carrying radioactive samples on his person from the radiation source (which couldn't be shut off easily) to a ramshackle radiation detector he made out of scrap aluminum.
There was a lot of complete disregard for safety at the time.

Anonymous No. 16284092

>>16278095
>>16278140
Math is the least important part of physics.

Anonymous No. 16284548

>>16284092
You tell the bullshit

Anonymous No. 16284552

>>16283751
>Well deserved. I wish I had such an assistant
kek 100%

Anonymous No. 16285229

>>16283751
It isn't

Anonymous No. 16285404

>>16284092
Doesnt matter, she didnt discover shit. Her work was as important as these people that hit heavy atoms in particle accelerators to create a few atoms of extremely unstable elements that vaporize within a microsecond. Then they go "uh breaking news element francisconium just discovered"

Anonymous No. 16285650

>>16277543
seethe, incel

Anonymous No. 16285995

>>16285650
>No arguments
>Emotional insults
Woman?

Anonymous No. 16286344

>>16285995
Yes

Anonymous No. 16287519

>>16277543
Female power

Anonymous No. 16287562

>>16286344
Post your tits, cunt

Anonymous No. 16288036

>>16287562
Fuck you incel

Anonymous No. 16288263

>>16277562
>as the other women who actually demonstrated serious ability to innovate intellectually?
Such as?

NoKrAb No. 16288269

>>16288263
t. Typical sci Spastic.

You make no sense faggot. You're dumb like the rest who talk like you.

Anonymous No. 16288299

>>16288269
Again, such as?
The few scientist woman people mention are just riding in the success of other men, like that black hole "programmer"

Anonymous No. 16288324

>>16277546
I don't know shit about shit, I don't even have to think about DEI. But I know with decent certainty that marie curie doesn't deserve her slot in history books without even looking, and you can too!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigler%27s_law_of_eponymy

Anonymous No. 16288421

>>16288299
emily noether, she was extremely important for physics

Anonymous No. 16288486

>>16277742
Lovelace took credit for a lot of his work. Charles was described as "being a man with a short temper" too, which kind of solidified my thinking around him being a smart dude getting shit on.

Anonymous No. 16288494

>>16288486
Nobody with a brain takes the claim she did anything of note seriously

Anonymous No. 16289237

>>16288421
I can guarantee this case isn't as pleasant for women as it appears to be

Anonymous No. 16289250

>>16277543
There should be an olympics of marrying up. Women would blow men out of the water.
> >Complete the rest
Thats more than 99% of useless cunts would do.

Anonymous No. 16289275

>>16289237
Why? And what do you mean by pleasant?
She had an extremely hard life, i dont think that increases or diminishes the feminism angle

Anonymous No. 16289902

>>16289275
Niggers also had tough life before liberation, and? Your point?

Anonymous No. 16290429

>>16282762
You made it up

Anonymous No. 16291181

>>16289902
He doesn't have one

Anonymous No. 16291933

Curie bros we lost

Anonymous No. 16291985

>>16286344
>t.tranny

Anonymous No. 16292403

>>16291985
*Woman

Anonymous No. 16292596

>>16291181
Correct. I wasnt trying to make a point, i was asking a question.

Anonymous No. 16293140

>>16291933
Totally

Anonymous No. 16293764

Fuck women

Anonymous No. 16294275

>>16277546
>Marie Curie is a DEI Nobel laureate
kek, wonder if she's the first?

Anonymous No. 16294281

>>16281315
It means he's about to say something that can give you an idea of or reveal how old he is.
>I might date myself by saying this, but I think films were better without the sound.

Anonymous No. 16294282

>>16277823
Jews do the same thing as well.

Anonymous No. 16294951

>>16294282
Jewish power

Anonymous No. 16295565

>>16282720
Are you retarded or behave like this in purpose?

Anonymous No. 16296207

>>16295565
Yes I'm I also love cunnilingus

Anonymous No. 16296210

>>16277543
Why did no no feminist even bring up Consitance tipper and her tipper test

Anonymous No. 16297110

>>16277543
I want to punch her in face

Anonymous No. 16297548

>>16297110
Me too

Anonymous No. 16298411

>>16289250
But that's not the reason to give nobel

Anonymous No. 16298863

>>16277875
>>16278082
There are formulas for Curie Temperature in magnetic materials, but maybe she got it from her second husband, idk and idc
When I was a posdoc there was an ugly girl that my supervisor wanted to fuck. She was smart, but any minor thing that she come up with caused some guy to come out of the blue to praise it as some genius idea. The supervisor, married to an ok looking woman, started giving every topic to this girl and doing the heavy lifting of the results. When anyone but the girl came up with an idea, he would not give it any attention, and later on he and the girl would publish a joint work with these ignored ideas. Funnilly enough, there were smarter prettier girls in the group, so we were puzzled by this. After one year the supervisor realizes the girl is not as bright as he thinks and ignores her, but she then has good publications, a PhD and is recognized in the area. The worst part is he didnt even fuck the girl in the end. I imagine she is manipulating some other simp wherever she is now

Anonymous No. 16298904

>>16277824
>If they want the engineering / science jobs maybe they shouldn't go into theater or nutritional studies. I totally know they can do it but for whatever reason they don't go into eng / sci.
they don't want those jobs, the media just tries to convince them, and you, that they do

Anonymous No. 16298999

>>16277609
Like children?

Anonymous No. 16299020

>>16298863
>Funnilly enough, there were smarter prettier girls in the group
A lot of times dudes won't go for the hottest chick because they figure their odds are better with the uglier ones, and they'll be lower maintenance

Anonymous No. 16299025

>>16298863
>There are formulas for Curie Temperature in magnetic materials
The Curie temperature is a threshold, not a formula. It's like having the boiling point or freezing point of water being named after you. And anyway it's named after Pierre Curie, not Marie.

Anonymous No. 16299096

>>16278934
>social work
>average IQ 103
come on now

Anonymous No. 16299555

>>16299096
It's really accurate

Anonymous No. 16300251

>>16278934
Holy kek

Anonymous No. 16300643

>>16278934
Holy based

Anonymous No. 16301377

>>16277824
They don't. They rig and lie in absolutely everything they touch

Anonymous No. 16301907

She is a total whore

Anonymous No. 16302142

>>16301907
Of course, she dated a married man

Anonymous No. 16302857

>>16296210
Because she is even bigger embaracement

Anonymous No. 16302870

>>16299020
>A lot of times dudes won't go for the hottest chick because they figure their odds are better with the uglier ones, and they'll be lower maintenance

The hot ones are disproportionately narcissistic, and sadly also disproportionately victims of sexual abuse/assault causing a whole fuck-ton of trauma baggage.

I think the best strategy is to find a smart one who doesn't care much about her appearance and then convince her to work out and looksmax.

Anonymous No. 16303524

>>16277543
It's not true

Anonymous No. 16304264

>>16302142
Lol

Anonymous No. 16304868

>>16299096
What us bad about it?

Anonymous No. 16305552

>>16277543
Scumbag

Anonymous No. 16306910

>>16305552
Sweet melody

Anonymous No. 16307045

>>16277543
>Two (2) Nobel prizes
>even Einstein had very high opinion on her
>risked her life and drove an ambulance during WW1 to help soldiers
>sacrificed her entire life researching radioactivity and eventually died due to it

You could not be a bigger incel and a faggot.

Anonymous No. 16307054

>>16307045
>Einstein had very high opinion on her
Hahaha, of course he was part of mainstream. Almost President of Israel after all

Image not available

747x180

hide.png

Anonymous No. 16307063

>>16307054
oh cool so you are just batshit insane

Anonymous No. 16307090

>>16307045
None of that matters. She did not research radioactivity anyway. she discovered some useless elements that anyone else could have if given the tools she was given. She was a lab technician scanning rock samples they brought her.

Anonymous No. 16307249

>>16307063
>No arguments
>Gaslighting
Very female way to deal with problems

Anonymous No. 16308207

>>16296207
And cuckoldry?

Image not available

600x800

202.jpg

Anonymous No. 16308735

>>16277543
Would

Anonymous No. 16309473

>>16308735
Bad taste

Anonymous No. 16309681

>>16281473
I think the real Jews, the ones that operate behind the scenes, love that their brazenly presented heel is so readily hated by the goyim without any further thought.

Anonymous No. 16309684

>>16280137
And if I say that an MBL pitcher has a 95 mph fastball, would you respond with some of his personal foibles as well? Or just take the relevant portion of what I said for sake of conversation?

Anonymous No. 16310759

>>16307090
Don't try to argue with a woman

Image not available

720x480

1722729132665547.jpg

Anonymous No. 16310761

If I find out this is something to do with you I will trap you in a cycle of 3000 machine years in the harshest hell I can make.

Anonymous No. 16310763

>>16310761
It's been 35 years. I promise I will do 100* that for yours.

Anonymous No. 16312028

>>16310761
Huh?

Anonymous No. 16312996

>>16302142
White wonen moment

Anonymous No. 16313440

>>16277543
How is this thread even alive at this point lmao

Anonymous No. 16313743

>>16302142
SHE FUCKED AND SUCKED PAUL LANGEVIN, HES IN THE SOLVAY CONFERENCE POSTER

Anonymous No. 16315008

>>16277543
Curie is cool