Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 23:10:43 UTC No. 16279524

Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 23:12:24 UTC No. 16279525

Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 23:17:31 UTC No. 16279531

>>16279520
It's as if you don't believe all the constant propaganda saying he's smart.

Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 23:41:49 UTC No. 16279555

>>16279520
>>16279524
>>16279525
That's just a testament to his extremely high IQ.
Dijkstra wrote all his notes on paper using a Montblanc fountain pen. Andrew Wiles found his proof working out of an office which only had three things: a desk, an extremely big pile of paper, and an old telephone.

>>16279531
>turbo midwit thinks he's smart for preparing a powerpoint
good job, you are operating at the level of an hr department.

🗑️ Barkon, Vard and Worl at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 23:45:33 UTC No. 16279561

You choose the good day. There are many targets. To people, we're the worst. Perhaps ever if judged. Maybe it's time to play by life's rules, pleasure in heaven, let go of what doesn't truly matter. Soon, leavers will be disliked it's that much about saving this 'future'.

Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 23:47:49 UTC No. 16279563

>>16279555
>In fact, the smarter you are, the less capable you are of figuring out how to operate a computer or a slide-making program!

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:50:36 UTC No. 16279641

>>16279563

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 00:57:14 UTC No. 16279652

>>16279520
We have similar handwriting, although mine is slightly worse

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 01:00:46 UTC No. 16279656

>>16279520
Why do people confuse being a good researcher/scientist/mathematician etc. with being a good teacher?

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 15:06:58 UTC No. 16280313

>>16279520
Is there any reason to suspect such a thing could exist? It sounds a lot like a meteorite breaking up in just the right way can solve problems.

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 19:03:51 UTC No. 16280522

>>16280313
He has constructed it for a different equation if I recall.

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 19:13:08 UTC No. 16280537

>>16280522
It's here, the averaged three dimensional Navier Stokes equation:
https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/finite-time-blowup-for-an-averaged-three-dimensional-navier-stokes-equation/

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 19:39:54 UTC No. 16280559

>>16279520
Live writing on a board is always bettter than presenting preprepared slides, which is a lot like reading from a book. The audience wants to see how you think about the subject on the fly, to see the progression of ideas in action, and writing while presenting is a great way to do that.

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:42:26 UTC No. 16281231

>>16279520
High paying jobs are pure grift, yes
This is why they made you take 4 years of writing in high school

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:44:40 UTC No. 16281234

>>16279520
I hate that he criticized Trump, because now we lefty Perelman Chads can't drag him without being thought of as salty redneck chuds.

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:45:49 UTC No. 16281236

>>16280537
>2014
Guess nothing came of it.

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:50:31 UTC No. 16281242

>>16279555
>a desk, an extremely big pile of paper, and an old telephone.
People might give him shit for the telephone, but dial-a-whores are actually tolerable replacements for muses when you have Wiles' physiognomy. My respect for him has grown.

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 11:01:43 UTC No. 16281250

>>16279520
is the punchline of this that you would need to solve the halting problem to solve an arbitrary navier stokes problem?

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 11:45:49 UTC No. 16281273

>>16279563
*less you are motivated to figuring

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 12:04:05 UTC No. 16281285

>>16281250
The punchline of this is that the majority of his "presentation" would've been speaker reference notes on the podium. Even if you believe Tao is something special in his field this kind of presentation would've been throw in the garbage in any undergrad course.

This is the sort of shit the laziest community college student would do.

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 13:05:23 UTC No. 16281332

>>16281285
i meant the research, i got the reference to the quality

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 13:09:57 UTC No. 16281337

>>16279520
maybe if they paid him more than 500k chang might have bothered to make better slides.

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:30:20 UTC No. 16282608

>>16281285
This is an interesting take; however, when you read a book, you are presented with the non-stylized form equivalent to what is presented here. Don't be mad when genius communicates itself in the simplest ways.

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:57:14 UTC No. 16282627

>>16279520
Myself remember a presentation of a Spanish nerd, barely speaking English and hard to understand. The foils are way worse than this. But the audience -as we say over here - hang on his lips, totally silent because what he says was outstanding. Content rules, not form
t. Guy living 200m apart from montblanc factory

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 21:46:53 UTC No. 16282870

Literally nothing wrong with this.

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:27:02 UTC No. 16282986

>>16279520
>>16279524
>>16279525
Math people have crippling autism and mild schizophrenia. Please be nice to them.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 02:35:31 UTC No. 16283108

>>16279520
that's an old presentation + there are still professors using messy chalk like its the 1940s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=AayZuuDDKP0

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 02:52:42 UTC No. 16283118

>>16279520
I'm still not convinced by his and Green's paper on arbitrarily long APs in the primes. I believe the result is true—just like I believe Polignac's conjecture is true—but I'm not convinced that either has been proven.