Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:14:54 UTC No. 16280060

>>16280055
I never thought openai would be desperate enough to shill on /sci/

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:16:28 UTC No. 16280061

>implying the elites wont give us universal basic income and lets us live like kings without having to work.

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:17:51 UTC No. 16280063

>>16280061
how is that universal basic income working for artists and programmers?

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:18:01 UTC No. 16280064

>>16280055
>math and science is about solving polynomial equations
OP is a faggot and clearly a highschooler

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:19:58 UTC No. 16280066

>>16280064
you can approximate integrals with polynomials, you can approximate almost everything with polynomials. Once they learn to solve polynomials, all the other math will be taken over by AI

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:20:47 UTC No. 16280068

>>16280066
You need to be 18 to post here

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:25:55 UTC No. 16280078

>>16280068
I am 18, 18 inches deep in your mom

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 17:08:06 UTC No. 16280379

>>16280061
You talk as if we're in the timeline of a solarpunk yogurt commercial, but fail to realize it's a grimdark timeline instead.

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 17:22:47 UTC No. 16280385

>>16280055
OpenAI has not been consistently candid with their promises and demonstrations.
In all likelihood, we won't have dumb schoolchild level AI for another 10 years at least.

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 17:38:04 UTC No. 16280395

>>16280078
You need to be born to post here.

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 20:11:48 UTC No. 16280591

>>16280055
it's ok, loyal wife of Maciej Nowicki is here...Eve Hyperintelligence

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 22:00:28 UTC No. 16280713

>>16280395
a common misconception

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 22:02:19 UTC No. 16280715

>>16280055
lmao maybe if you know what Q* is you won't be talking so much bullshit.

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 22:12:44 UTC No. 16281677

>>16280055
P = NP because of random search space convergence

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 22:41:53 UTC No. 16281707

>>16280055
I've said for years that teaching students to solve pages upon pages of integrals by hand is a waste of time since anyone in a real job just uses software to do it now.

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 22:56:52 UTC No. 16281719

>>16280055
No contemporaneous calculator will ever solve a math problem that a contemporaneous calculator can't. It's a tautology.

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 22:58:25 UTC No. 16281723

>>16280055
>This means that soon everyone who has spent the last 4 years studying a STEM major will become obsolete. We will be like the artists and the programmers, unable to find a job or profit from our work because the AI is going to do it for free.
Based.

>>16280385
If its not OpenAI it will be someone else. Solving learning and manipulation of symbolic representation (i.e. language) is 80% of the way to AGI.

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 23:27:46 UTC No. 16281751

>>16280055
They always say shit like that and the results are always grossly underwhelming. I am tired of AI's censored crap that can't even draw fingers the right way, and is completely unable to produce consistent results. That shit is a fucking slot machine, a fucking toy, and they only want investor's money.

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 23:32:32 UTC No. 16281760

>>16280713
based and fetusposting pilled

Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 23:37:42 UTC No. 16281766

>>16280055
But would you fly a plane which was designed purely by Ai?

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:27 UTC No. 16281784

>>16281766
Not him but no. AI has always been pump and dump and always will be

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:30:38 UTC No. 16281819

>>16280055
>This means that soon everyone who has spent the last 4 years studying a STEM major will become obsolete
is it really necessary to phrase these things in such exaggerated manner? the AI incremental improvements are interesting enough to not be inflated beyond expectation

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:35:45 UTC No. 16281826

>>16281819
>the AI incremental improvements are interesting enough to not be inflated beyond expectation
not if you want to scam 800 hojillion dollars from investors

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 03:25:59 UTC No. 16281932

>>16280385
>t. retarded incel luddite who doesn't even have a basic grasp of the ongoing AI revolution

You need to go back to your containment board.

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:46:39 UTC No. 16282230

>>16280055
if this were /pol/, I'd tell you to kill yourself for not providing a link. mandatory decorum prevents me from doing so here.

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:49:19 UTC No. 16282234

>>16280055
OpenAI is a has-been. they know nothing. they tried something at a larger scale once, without any idea whether it will work and they got lucky. there's not some genius collection there at work, although OP's fake news story tries to capitalize on that perception, much like retards attribute shit to Einstein.

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:51:18 UTC No. 16282235

this kind of AI is at its limits. larger models will be under less pressure to generalize, so they will be dumber. it would be interesting to see if context window size can be decoupled from weight count, though, growing the former and holding on to the latter.

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:44:21 UTC No. 16282748

>>16280055
mhm

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:46:52 UTC No. 16282751

maybe with the next gen AI it will finally start seeping in what I've been telling you

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:45:43 UTC No. 16282950

>>16280055
You mean Wolfram Alpha?