🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 15:23:12 UTC No. 16280329
Why is IQ considered mostly genetic except in the context of race where all of the differences are due to things like nutrition and institutionalized racism? Seems a little bizarre to me that the n word has such a strongly negative effect on cognitive ability
Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 15:25:33 UTC No. 16280331
>>16280329
because your scientific field is funded by blackrock
Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 15:41:49 UTC No. 16280338
>>16280329
Sub
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 03:14:09 UTC No. 16281912
>>16280331
>BlackRock says gunman from Trump rally briefly appeared in an ad for them
https://fortune.com/2024/07/14/thom
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:18:29 UTC No. 16281969
>>16280329
Because if we speak up about the flawed DEI policies we risk getting fired, forgotten, and shit out onto the street as a failure.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 06:36:20 UTC No. 16282074
>>16280329
If you have shit nutrition then that will lower your IQ, but that doesn't mean that it isn't also genetic. Which factors will dominate depends on the environment.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:11:33 UTC No. 16282466
>>16280329
China, world intelligence leader country, just because they don't have niggers.
Simulacrum at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:46:19 UTC No. 16282507
>>16280329
Institutionalized racism is more than just "the n word." Institutionalized racism encompasses may things such as job discrimination, discrimination in the justice system, stop and frisk policies, etc.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:19:39 UTC No. 16282539
>>16282507
It's not racism, it only seems so because niggers are judged according to their ability and they lack it.
Simulacrum at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:32:03 UTC No. 16282549
>>16282539
>It's not racism, it only seems so because niggers are judged according to their ability and they lack it.
The science says you are wrong. So many studies have found that even with identical resumes, black sounding names on job applications are significantly more likely to be rejected relative to white sounding names.
https://www.bowdoin.edu/news/2023/1
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:44:46 UTC No. 16282561
>>16282549
It's science only if they applied by the same name...
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:54:53 UTC No. 16282569
>>16280329
Because it is
Niggers will cope
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:04:36 UTC No. 16282710
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 13:47:07 UTC No. 16283488
>>16280329
Because people would rather not hurt the feelings of others, to disastrous effect.
“Suicidal empathy”.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 15:00:18 UTC No. 16283562
Suppose it is definitively proven that x race of people are stupid. What are you realistically going to do about it from the perspective of society as a whole when those people already exist within your society? Is officially proclaiming their stupidity from the rooftops going to be productive in any meaningful way?
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 15:04:56 UTC No. 16283563
If they knew about the legions I set up when my task was to get just one shot right, they'd laugh at me.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 15:21:49 UTC No. 16283585
>>16280329
Iq sure, but not intelligence imo. I think if you teach them since they were toddlers the correct things in a good way they can be intelligent despite their genes, sure the iq will affect on how fast they can learn, but don't think it limits them on how much they can really learn. The biggest factor though surely will be the parents or grandparents if they did anything scientific.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 15:30:26 UTC No. 16283597
>>16280329
Truthfully we know fuckall about how these complex polygenic systems work beyond some very basics you can establish via observational studies like twin-studies (which are the best we have ATM but are pretty post-hoc if we're being honest).
There's a ton of stuff that is up in the air at the moment that is very likely to be strongly genetic if we were to magically find the "genetic codebook" for those traits (assuming one properly exists).
In terms of race and IQ, the problem really comes down to genetic IQ being a ceiling not a floor. We know for a fact that there's a ton of social factors which lower the average IQ of African Americans beyond what it "could be" if these social factors were not present. If I were a betting man, I'd still put money on the average IQ of blacks being lower than whites by some reasonable margin even when these social/cultural factors are corrected for. But I'd also bet it's less than the full standard deviation that current research (which doesn't do much to control for social/cultural confounding factors) shows.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:12:31 UTC No. 16283643
>>16283597
>a ton of social factors which lower the average IQ of African Americans beyond what it "could be" if these social factors were not present.
every study i've seen that controls for those (it's a very base level critique of race/iq studies so it's been addressed many, many times) still shows them being far behind whites and asians
Simulacrum at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:18:01 UTC No. 16283653
>>16282561
If the resumes submitted all had the same name, they wouldn't be able to test for racial bias.
If you mean that the black sounding names should all have the same name, otherwise this wouldn't be science, then that of course would be wrong. The studies are scientific because they are testing a falsifiable hypothesis. Perhaps the scientific studies are not foolproof because they do not take into account that maybe specific "black" names are discriminated against not because they are "black" per se, but because they appear unsightly or ridiculous, but that does not mean these studies are not science.
Regardless, it is far more likely that we are seeing racial bias, rather than just bias towards specific names. This alternate hypothesis you're alluding to would not explain the majority of the difference we see between responses to white-sounding names and black-sounding names, it would appear to only explain the difference between the response rates of two specific names, which is not the noted difference.
🗑️ Simulacrum at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:42:27 UTC No. 16283693
>>16283597
>>16283643
There are more than just social factors you would have to account for. For example, it is known that nutrition affects intelligence. You would have to control for nutrition as well, and controlling for social factors is easy if you're being comprehensive about it.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 18:27:31 UTC No. 16283845
>>16283562
>Is officially proclaiming their stupidity from the rooftops going to be productive in any meaningful way?
Yes. Americans need to be told just how stupid they are.
Pretending we’re all equivalently capable is also a recipe for disaster.
Equality of outcome is stupid. Equity of outcome is just right.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 18:40:00 UTC No. 16283866
>>16280329
Because the only real solution for all the problems in the world is to cut the balls of any male with IQ below 110. Simple as.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 18:44:55 UTC No. 16283878
>>16283866
but that doesn't solve the problem of men with IQs over 110 not finding real life partners.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 18:47:44 UTC No. 16283882
>>16280329
Because mid century Germans, 150 years of communist subversion, and dysgenic collapse of civilisation.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 18:50:18 UTC No. 16283885
>>16283597
I certainly think the gap is dropping between the races. We’re all getting dumber due to dysgenic selection pressures caused by complex civilisation (welfare, hospitals, low child mortality).
We need eugenics asap if we want to avoid collapse.
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:07:59 UTC No. 16285615
>>16283885
we need tnd
Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:33:07 UTC No. 16285645
>>16283885
Women aren't having enough babies in the civilized world and once the realities of exponential population decay are apparent there will be some form of state sponsored birthing program. It is a short step to eugenics from there
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 13:45:33 UTC No. 16287173
>>16285645
>It is a short step to eugenics from there
This will be after we’re all dead sadly
Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 19:07:53 UTC No. 16287585
>>16280329
IRBs. When I was working in a neuroscience lab, I had to take extensive IRB training. The IRB training used Murray and Hernstein's IQ research as an example of forbidden research that slipped through the cracks and that you aren't allowed to do. Scientists are literally just prohibited from reaching the obvious conclusion that the races behave and perform differently because they are different.
Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 00:33:26 UTC No. 16287908
IQ is overwhelmingly genetic. That’s it, the end, it’s over. And that’s fine; everyone already accepts only genetically gifted people are attractive, be muscular, exceptionally athletic, etc. Being smart is just another one of those genetic qualities you have or you don’t.
Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 01:46:19 UTC No. 16287947
>>16280329
Science is held back by ((the message ) )
Anything that goes against ((the message )) is le bad to the weak minded
Even if it is true and can be scientifically proven it is automatically not true to npc’s if it goes against ((the message ))
So say you prove that “women “ with dicks aren’t women or that black people are on avarage more violent and dumber , or even that mutts are unhealthy mentally and physically it dose not matter because it goes against zogs narrative
Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 01:47:20 UTC No. 16287948
>>16280331
/thread
The noticing will continue
Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 01:48:15 UTC No. 16287949
>>16280329
It’s not and you are a retard for giving this nonsense even the slightest acknowledgement of validity. Even sarcastically, you are perpetuating this mind virus as a topic worthy of discussion like the good little retarded pawn you are.
Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 01:52:24 UTC No. 16287956
>>16282549
>the science
Is controlled by a political elite who are in themselves controlled by a group of evil bankers with large noses
Everything true that goes against their will and what they want is going to be considered not true because they say so
Faggots like you are the reason people still buy into the lie that men can be women and that being a fat fuck is healthy
Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 02:01:23 UTC No. 16287968
>>16280329
Nutrition is huge. Unless you're really OCD/autistic about eating enough of all your micronutrients, you're probably not having enough of at least one. Not having enough iodine turns people into literal cretins.
>t. was once iodine deficient in Midwest Burgerstan, got tested, started seaweed snacks, cured derpes
Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 03:01:32 UTC No. 16288013
Iodine deficencies...
this stuff should be evident. Damage (nutrition, environment, etc...) is blunting (or worse).
We all understand that.
It's really about interesting genetics questions with an added triggering/accelerant racial spice.
I don't know the answers.