Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 01:07:52 UTC No. 16280871
>schizo has delusion of omniscience can't resist the emotional urge to spew word salad
Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 21:52:25 UTC No. 16281662
>>16280827
are photos such as these actually real? looks magnificent, but where would you have to be to see this?
Anonymous at Sun, 14 Jul 2024 22:05:57 UTC No. 16281672
>>16281662
They're real in the sense that the matter exists out there, but these photos combine various wavelength captures that we can't see with the naked eye, then those radio/x-ray/etc captures are colored with visual spectrum colors for our viewing pleasure - usually with artistic liberties so it's not just all red or violet or something. Photos of nebulae are often taken in non-visible spectrums since there's so much cosmic dust and shit obscuring the subject in the visible spectrum, but many galaxies have been photographed in the visible spectrum alone.
Hubble is able to take visible spectrum photos, but the JWST doesn't and captures infrared spectrums as necessitated by its mission.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 02:41:50 UTC No. 16281888
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magn
>Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD; also called magneto-fluid dynamics or hydromagnetics) is a model of electrically conducting fluids that treats all interpenetrating particle species together as a single continuous medium. It is primarily concerned with the low-frequency, large-scale, magnetic behavior in plasmas and liquid metals and has applications in multiple fields including space physics, geophysics, astrophysics, and engineering.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:14:07 UTC No. 16281966
>>16280824
Correct.
More accurately the universe is non-viscous, continuous perfect fluid. The perfect fluid is all that exists. Because it has friction against nothing flows are continuous once in motion. Magnetism, etc... is a fluid flow.
Particles are vortices, electromagnetism currents and gravity it's pressure gradient.
This can be computationally simulated relatively easily.
Not really sure why it's not common knowledge. Suspect because plebs Luke us are not meant to know such things. Gatekeepers, etc...
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:17:18 UTC No. 16281967
>>16281966
Also, in addition... the word "fluid" is a misnomer - though closest analogy. It's is very fluidlike but a pure information system. Not math. More base than human math. A more perfect logic.
Human math glitches with realnumbers, etc... the "perfect fluid" doesn't. Our math is crude in comparison. As words were crude to math.
Universe can be simulated by averaging realnumbers locally on a continuous grid. Unified equation.
I'm serious and this is accurate. I just do this for curiousity sake. Not looking for harrassment. Thank you
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:20:53 UTC No. 16281973
>>16281967
>Universe can be simulated by averaging realnumbers locally on a continuous grid. Unified equation.
Emphasis on simulated. Only the universe can replicate itself. Only it is the perfect Turing machine. Our Sims will always have a pixel like quality while base universe is perfectly continuous.
Again, this can, and has, been simulated. It is accurate.
I got interested in this topic because I thought sciences were pure merit based, but it's actually highly political. Again, I'm not looking for harrassment. I just like this stuff.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 04:22:40 UTC No. 16281975
>>16281973
>but it's actually highly political. Again, I'm not looking for harrassment. I just like this stuff.
In other words I'm not interested in being harassed over my lack of credentials or being named called. If you are genuinely curious about this subject I can answer questions about it. It's theory - not worth getting rhetorically violent over.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 06:01:41 UTC No. 16282055
>>16281966
>>16281967
>>16281973
if any of this is true how come theres no comprahensive named theory describing it?
there are fairly known non mainstream named theories like electric universe but I've never hear about this one
if it can be simulated relatively easily this shouldnt be the case
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 06:32:03 UTC No. 16282072
>>16282055
There is a comprehensive named theory for it... but I'm a pretty low key person. People put a name to a theory... then they want to put a face to the theory. I value my sanity too much for all that. World is too crazy. I just like talking about ideas here anonymously.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 06:34:26 UTC No. 16282073
>>16282072
>comprehensive named theory for it
As in, there is a name that I give the theory, and it is comprehensive. But I prefer to just discuss ideas rather than label things. I already tried that previous path. It's not advisable, lol. Things get way too "political" and personal. Common consciousness doesn't fully understand the idea of attacking ideas rather than people - they like the drama. I don't.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 06:38:00 UTC No. 16282076
>>16282055
I'm perfectly fine with explaining the unified equation here, but seriously if it gets too personal I'm out. It's all theory - no use getting heated or political about it. If it contradicts whoever or whatever its not a personal attack.. I'm not out to make anyone look wrong, I'm just curious about the Universe and put in a lot of work
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 06:56:28 UTC No. 16282085
>>16281967
>Human math glitches with realnumbers
So its exactly like how reality glitches with the double slit experiment?
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 06:58:20 UTC No. 16282086
>>16282076
You are already making it personal by refusing to answer three times in a row because you would prefer to talk about yourself on social media than try to present your retarded easily debunked "comprehensive theory".
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 07:15:59 UTC No. 16282095
>>16282072
>>16282076
are just shitposting or qctuall paranoic schizophrenic?
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 07:36:42 UTC No. 16282103
>>16282086
Arsefucking around is your specialty. Doing well.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 07:40:53 UTC No. 16282104
>>16282076
Let’s start. Pinky promise I will attack your ideas with my horde. I have a similar minded friend who is obsessed with base reality so I would like to propose him your ideas.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 07:56:41 UTC No. 16282113
>>16282103
No, pointing out your retarded hypocrisy is my specialty since your attempt to completely avoid people talking about you instead of your theory was to make three posts in a row talking exclusively about yourself instead of articulating anything about your "comprehensive theory" and your only response was to keep trying to engage in personal talk about other people instead of saying a single thing about your theory.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:05:08 UTC No. 16282458
>>16280824
Luminoferous Eather is fluid with innertia, that's why it has been disproved, they looked for solid without it.
bodhi at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:45:42 UTC No. 16282506
obviously
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:45:57 UTC No. 16282685
>>16282458
True.
The Michelson Morley would not have detected the existance of air if calibrated for sound waves. This was the most face-palm oversight in the history of science and when physics was forked down a dead-end. I don't know how scientists were so stupid - seems like an impossibly stupid oversight - so I suspect it was intentionally inserted into common knowledge to lead others away from advanced weapons development and in particular nuclear physics. Much harder to build the b*mb when you don't understand how tf the universe works. But now that the dust has settled its better for people to know the truth. Yes, the aether is blatantly and unequivocally real and nothing makes sense without it. Those who say otherwise are as worth entertaining as advocates for the Abrahamic G*d are.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:48:56 UTC No. 16282689
>>16282685
Today I red paper, that they found up device which spins from static magnet. Do you think they tough of it as energy source? Not at all.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:51:13 UTC No. 16282694
Imagine believing that light, particles & forces can propagate without an information carrying medium, i.e. aether. The only alternative is g*d which increasingly looks to be why the aether was rejected - in order to propagate a false Abrahamic ideology and in particular the false big bang theory. Our universe will provably be found to be an infinite and eternal "fractal", i.e. the martyr Giordano Bruno - who remains a heretic to this day - was RIGHT. And with this revelation goes the last remaining thread of the ch*rches credibility in the realm of science... and by extention health care which they need to get to out of anyway for the benefit of our species.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:57:20 UTC No. 16282701
We (likely Asia - since this info is suppressed by Abrahmites) will find older and older galaxies forever. No big bang. Eternal and infinite universe. Similarly, high speed and resolution "microscopes" will find that atoms are "time accellerated" galaxies. Time is not real - only relative motion is real - and "time" accellerates into scale toward the limit of c, the speed of causality. This is not schizo 4chan posting - it will be commonly understand fact within the next 1 to 1000 years. Fact cannot be contained for long anyway. It us the truth.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:59:23 UTC No. 16282702
I didn't set out to destroy the Abrahamic cultural narrative. It's their fault for not adapting to the growing evidence. That is the flaw in chiseling your worldview in stone.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:01:03 UTC No. 16282704
>>16282702
And it's important to speak bluntly about this since so few realize how grossly the "under g*d" nation has allowed that worldview to infect the sciences. So few realize that it is religion propping up big bang theory and Michelson Morley and not evidence.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:01:20 UTC No. 16282706
>>16282055
Ether/electric universe
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:20:51 UTC No. 16282980
>>16282085
>So its exactly like how reality glitches with the double slit experiment?
Double slit is because of "pilot wave"... it's easy to simulate granted acceptance if a universal medium. Like ripples on an ocean. But because the universal is base medium it "pools" or "vortices" into particles - wave particle duality. It's emergent from the unified equation which is simply realnumbers averaging locally on a continuous grid. Again, the universe is not "math" but we we don't have a logic more accurate yet... our realnumbers break down into irrationals etc... the universe logic doesn't. Universe can calculate infinite sums. Our math Can only approximate so we round after a certain number of digits. Universe does not round that I know of... can calculate irrational numbers perfectly at speed of c
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:21:33 UTC No. 16282981
>>16280824
The Universe is a plasma. Check mate anon!
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:27:18 UTC No. 16282987
>>16282980
>It's emergent from the unified equation which is simply realnumbers averaging locally on a continuous grid.
I cannot stress this enough. Calculating realnumbers (negative & positive) locally on a real number grid, with graphical overlay of vector arrows pointing toward greatest change simulates all r forces of physics- simultaneously.
And this is logical because it's the most base & elegant equation of perfect fluid - and that is what our universe is, a perfect fluid.
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:31:55 UTC No. 16282995
>>16282981
>The Universe is a plasma. Check mate anon!
Correct, so to speak! The verbiage is blue of course, but yes, the universe is a single substance - infinite and eternal - that sums to exactly 0. The universe is everything and exactly nothing. Ex nihlio. A repeating "fractal".
Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:32:56 UTC No. 16282998
>>16282995
>blue
The verbiage is blunt, not blue
bodhi at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:36:29 UTC No. 16283039
>>16282987
this you gary?