Image not available

1564x940

wikipedia.png

🗑️ 🧵 non political wikipedia thread

Anonymous No. 16281690

I'm a simple man. I don't do; I teach. Sometimes I look up things on wikipedia and if it's spelled wrong, I correct it.

There is a cancer in wikipedia. Please submit names and examples of administrators using automation to revert *non political* revisions. If you were banned after correcting the automated reversions, please include that, too.

Known fascists include

>Materialscientist
>Orangemike
>Drmies

Anonymous No. 16281785

>>16281690
Only saving means for wiki is to burn down the server farms entirely. That place is a total heap of trash and there is nothing of value to be found. Its all political propaganda

Anonymous No. 16281789

>>16281785
NO POLITICS

The rot is Peter Principle. A few early adopters of a website found themselves cornered by bullshit and became the bullshit they were cornered by, That's it.

Anonymous No. 16281793

lmao just go outside

Anonymous No. 16281796

>>16281793
I am. Are you?

Anonymous No. 16281806

To be clear.
If the people on my list were once good people trying to help the dispersion of human knowledge, they should resign immediately.

If not, I will be alive long after their deaths and I will personally ensure that the fascism of their old lives will irrevocably tarnish any nonfascist tendancies they might have had as children.

Anonymous No. 16281825

i like pies

Image not available

1215x6110

larry sanger on w....jpg

Anonymous No. 16283020

Image not available

505x669

orangemike.png

Anonymous No. 16283072

OP here renewing my vow to both outlive and eviscerate the legacy of anyone who abuses an undeserved authority.

Anonymous No. 16283081

>>16281690
>0xCODEBABE
Is this slut hot?

Anonymous No. 16283090

>>16283081
If she's contemporary to the fashipedia outgrowth, maybe gilf hot?

Image not available

640x284

walrus.png

Anonymous No. 16283135

Imagine being this guy lol

Anonymous No. 16283152

>non political
>wikipedia
choose one

Anonymous No. 16283172

>>16283152
Politics wil be politics. The spelling of a fictional character's name is a matter of reference, not politics. The fact that an insular group of decaying old men want to destroy the collaborative beauty of wikipedia is also, now, a matter of reference.

Anonynous No. 16283590

>>16281690
>nonpolitical thread
>here's a list of "known fascists."
>>/pol/

Anonymous No. 16283825

>>16283590
In contemporary English, a fascist is anyone who abuses a position authority they didn't deserve, divorced from its erstwhile relation to corporatism.

Anonymous No. 16283832

I only edit obscure topics and create pages on things no one has heard about so this never happens. I have made the majority of edits on most pages I have created or worked on. Even when I jump into contentious things this does not happen if it is obscure enough.

Anonymous No. 16283838

>>16281690
>>16283590
>nonpolitical thread
>White saviour complex
OP is a racist.

Anonymous No. 16283853

>>16283838
OP here. Our communication is limited to the language we share. "White savior complex" describes, exactly, the complex on which these old white men have immolated themselves. Is there a "black savior complex" in the vernacular?

Anonymous No. 16283854

>>16283832
What's more obscure than whether the name of fictional TV character is spelled "Kornish" or "Cornish"?

Image not available

2214x306

Screenshot 2024-0....png

Anonymous No. 16284193

"Disruptive editing" lol. Making you and your old white circle of death look bad by being perfectly correct.

Anonymous No. 16284196

>>16283854
Is it a popular show? I am more talking about minutia from my own field or some obscure historical even 5 people have heard about.

Anonymous No. 16284203

>>16284196
Such as?

Anonymous No. 16285647

>>16281690
What happens when the world becomes peer-regulated big brother like reddit? When everyone goes down cancel culture road?

Anonymous No. 16285899

what was the word?

>>16283832
link a page you made

Anonymous No. 16285915

>>16281690
urbandictionary is better structured than wikipedia
in ud, you can submit the 1,000th definition of apple and it will be there, just at the bottom until its gets traction
to apply this to wikipedia, you would have multiple articles for the same topic than can be tabbed between eachother and sorted
if you're going to do a decentralized encyclopedia at least do it right

Anonymous No. 16286322

>>16285915
That's an appealing idea, don't they use something like it on quora too?

Anonymous No. 16286605

>>16285915
How do you regulate for botting or spam?

Anonymous No. 16286976

what do we pay jannies for?

Image not available

958x539

my_life_as_Inukai....png

🗑️ visit soygem.party No. 16286982

>>16286976
for being cute and fluffy

Image not available

1010x1410

Musk says wikiped....jpg

Anonymous No. 16288044

Anonymous No. 16288055

>>16288044
Katherine Maher has numerous videos of herself explaining that truth doesn't matter. Further she works at Signal too. So its all intel ops.

Anonymous No. 16288787

>>16286605
OP here. (Not the poster you're replying to.)
>How do you regulate for botting or spam?
That's exactly the problem. There seems to be a small, parasitic blob of wikipedia superusers who have parasitized the site with bots and spam. None of it helps the articles be more accurate, all it does it help the sad, old fascists stroke their own white savior complexes.

Anonymous No. 16288797

>>16288787
Who are these supposed fascists you keep talking about?

Anonymous No. 16288812

>>16288797
My arbitrary encounter was with
>>16281690
>Materialscientist
>Orangemike
>Drmies
They aren't supposed fascists. It's easy enough to follow the links from the article history and see exactly how each one of these users have abused their authority for self-serving, wiki-disserving reasons.

Anonymous No. 16288836

>>16285647
At a human scale, the world has always been peer-regulated and always will be. My accusation isn't that "the man" is out to get me. It's that the tidal catpiss sprayed out by decrepit old narcissists like Materialscientist, Orangemike, and Drmies is Monsantoesque. If not properly addressed and punished, it will eventually kill the biome of wikipedia crowd-sourcing.

Anonymous No. 16288903

Btw, this is this (one of the) automatic catpiss bot(s) that sprays counterproductive narcissism all over wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Huggle
>Huggle is a diff browser intended for dealing with vandalism and other unconstructive edits on Wikimedia projects

Imagine how intellectually rotten, dishonest, or megalomaniacal you'd have to be to "deal with" vandalism by both using and promoting vandalism at an incomparable magnitude.

Anonymous No. 16289112

cancer of Wikipedia:
>David Gerard
>GeneralRelative
>Aquillion

also JessWade88 is objectively a horrible editor

Anonymous No. 16289115

>>16289112
Thank you. Can you link me in advance to any non political articles where these users abused their power or it is a treasure hunt?
>JessWade88
Jess Wade 88 is an open Hitler lover it seems

Anonymous No. 16289118

>>16289115
well for instance with Gerard it’s mostly political but he’s a fucking douche. lots of examples were documented by this gay furry mormon here: https://www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/reliable-sources-how-wikipedia-admin

Anonymous No. 16289119

Jess Wade Heil Hilter
>https://www.adl.org/resources/hate-symbol/88

Anonymous No. 16289123

>>16289118
>https://www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/reliable-sources-how-wikipedia-admin
Thank you. This will take me days to read but I will.

Anonymous No. 16289124

>>16281690
>screenshotting your own reddit posts
we've reached maximum cancer

Anonymous No. 16289127

>>16289124
I apologize for being the first 4chan poster to screenshot their own reddit posts. I offer this rare link to help manage your cancer.
>https://www.cancer.org/cancer/managing-cancer/treatment-types.html

Image not available

642x1012

reddit.png

Anonymous No. 16289135

Why does the content on reddit do this?

Anonymous No. 16289141

>>16289112
>>16289118
Can you please point me to the inferred fascism of
>GeneralRelative
>Aquillion
whenever you have the chance. All the best.

Anonymous No. 16289146

>>16289141
they’re just horrible editors who do nothing but push a false consensus to push a false narrative. i don’t think either of them are admins (anymore? maybe GeneralRelative was in the past? i forget) but they certainly lead flash mobs against anyone who goes against their agendas and file incident reports on anyone they don’t like

Anonymous No. 16289149

>>16289146
By flash mob do you mean a sort of automatic reply? Can you recall any specific articles or dates so flashed
>David Gerard
>GeneralRelative
>Aquillion

Anonymous No. 16289156

>>16289149

gerard is another story. i already posted an article about hin so please see that

for GeneralRelative and Aquillion: by flash mobs I mean they have a clique of co-ideologues on wikipedia on, and those two band-lead them from one talk page or RfC or incident report to another to gang up on any editor (especially new editors) they want to get banned, and they often succeed thanks to their fake “consensus” of their 10 wiki friends citing a hundred WP:BS policies, which smothers any newfag they don’t like to death in the crib

Anonymous No. 16289170

>>16289156
I appreciate it, the reply and the context. Thank you. We will eventually carve these shit stains out like the cancer they are.

Image not available

577x587

wikiman.png

Anonymous No. 16290108

Anonymous No. 16290345

>>16290108
pruitt is fine though. he just catalogs factoids about obscure history shit. I bet GeneralRelative and Aquillion look even worse than him, probably both neckbearded greta thunbergs with purple hair around their bald spots

Anonymous No. 16290359

>>16281690
Can I get a qrd?

Image not available

1160x1240

Screenshot 2024-0....png

Anonymous No. 16291227

>>16290359
I forgot about the other account that participated interstitially, Staraction. The list of known fascists:

>Materialscientist
>Orangemike
>Drmies
>Staraction

A wonderfully fortuitous acronym that falls so ripely off the tree.

Anonymous No. 16291267

>>16290359
>>16291227
Iow, superusers botting wikipedia means that the resource is no longer crowdsourced from the ground by contributors but pissed on from the sky by dictators.

Anonymous No. 16291376

To put an even finer point on it, none of these four accounts have a CV that they'd consider referentially viable by their own standards. Wikipedia is an idiocracy.

Anonymous No. 16291382

A heavy-handed idiocracy. If it were a light-handed idiocracy, no one would care.

Anonymous No. 16292013

>>16281789
>The rot is Peter Principle.
That, and also the Iron Law of the Oligarchy. And that is how it became political.

Anonymous No. 16292022

>>16290108
>>16290345
He takes credit for editing but creating the articles in teh first place is done by nameless users, the very people the editors despise:
http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia

Anonymous No. 16292075

>>16281690
For what? Wikipedia isn't a reliable source (nothing online can), just a summary of more or less BS people writes. It has no expertise on published points and idc if the psycho is the editor or edits the site.

If i need expertise i avoid that site and ask people who has (usually specialized forums and books). If i want to know the current mainstream ideologies and errors i read WP.


>If you were banned after correcting the automated reversions, please include that, too.
Tried only once, a grossly mistranslated IT term that makes no sense in German. Was immediately reverted (manually) because of "sources" .

Anonymous No. 16292098

>>16292075
>If i need expertise i avoid that site and ask people who has (usually specialized forums and books). If i want to know the current mainstream ideologies and errors i read WP.
Very good. Sadly you are in a tiny, tiny minority. People used to say nobody lies on TV, now they assume Wikipedia never lies.
>>If you were banned after correcting the automated reversions, please include that, too.
>Tried only once, a grossly mistranslated IT term that makes no sense in German. Was immediately reverted (manually) because of "sources" .
i have similar experiences.

Anonymous No. 16292106

>>16281785
My motto is if you're a nonexpert and you've heard of it, the Wikipedia page probably sucks. Examples include climate change, big bang, evolution, and so on.

Anonymous No. 16292171

>>16292098
>>If i need expertise i avoid that site and ask people who has (usually specialized forums and books). If i want to know the current mainstream ideologies and errors i read WP.
>Very good. Sadly you are in a tiny, tiny minority. People used to say nobody lies on TV, now they assume Wikipedia never lies.

Do not care (any more). Neither can change nor am i responsible for. The pursue of truth btw. is a very double-edged thing. Someone can live a good honest life as an MM believer or be an absolute as......e knowing what to know. For me more a burden i can't live without as something useful. Most people are pretty fine to live mostly without. Maybe you have to e made for.

Anonymous No. 16292181

>>16292106
>Examples include climate change, big bang, evolution, and so on.
These Themes are more philosophical and the dispute a waste of time. All have very limited science abilities (no experiments, very unreliable data aso) and are good examples for beleive systems.
Btw. smb i know disproved the big bang with a three liner in geometrical math over here. Simple energy dissolution while space expanding. It was "pruned or deleted". /sci is in no way better than WP

Image not available

460x480

daily-shoah-comic.png

Anonymous No. 16293028

>>16289119

Anonymous No. 16293062

As an actual fascist, could you please refrain from labelling retarded fat power tripping communists with my ideology, because they are certainly not fascists. Thank you.

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16293064

>>16293062
fascists are just communist wannabes. hitler copied marx.
if you are retarded enough to be a fascist, go full stalinist. he's a true winner, unlike the losers hitler and mussolini.

Anonymous No. 16293088

>>16293064
Dawn you are literally retarded. Also when it takes the might of the entire industrialised world to take down your one fascist state, there's probably some merit to it.

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16293091

>>16293088
>the might of the entire industrialised world to take down your one fascist state
it's not the entire industrialised world vs one fascist state you retarded fuck. frances was severely weakened and didn't count. hitler and mussolini had a fuck ton of allies. pretty much every other state in Europe became either Germany ally or follow german ideology.
and remember your retarded furher lost because he turned against the USSR, a literal jewish ruled shitholes where peasants were starving to death.
the retarded side lost WW2 fucking dumbass.

Anonymous No. 16294366

>>16293064
stalin's winning techniques included purging the jews from positions of political power, mass murdering some of them and deporting the rest to siberia

Image not available

1019x770

wikipedia is fake....jpg

Anonymous No. 16295621

>>16281690

Anonymous No. 16296873

>>16281690
>wikipedia
>non political
choose one
wikipedia is a political propaganda outlet thinly disguised as an online encyclopedia

Image not available

678x632

15bb8c19.png

Anonymous No. 16297933

Wikipedia says that the Kalergi Plan is a debunked conspiracy theory

Image not available

480x640

1721833578988910.png

Anonymous No. 16298177

When I was a kid I was thought we were not allowed to use Wikipedia as a source since it was unreliable because "anyone could edit it."

Back then I complained and really thought my teachers were wrong.

But many years later having seen a few mistakes here and there, poor pesentation and wording, sometimes utter incomprehensible nonsense, chaotic vandalism, meaningless irrelevant information, and above all else politically motivated terminally leftycel online wars I have come to understand my teachers were right all along. Wikipedia is just a spring platform for midwits to reach newer heights of dunning-kreuger and denial

Anonymous No. 16298181

>>16281690
Just make an account. What's the problem?

Image not available

469x385

1722038335674778.jpg

Anonymous No. 16298187

>>16298177
>thought

Anonymous No. 16298271

When Elon bought Twitter, one of the first thing he did was fire thousands of people. There were literally over 100 FBI agents working at Twitter. For some unexplainable reason, this was never an issue, no one care, and it was never brought up again. Do you honestly think Wikipedia or any of these other corporations are any different? People thought it was draconian that China requires CCP members to sit on the board of every company, but the US literally does the same thing. There are probably dozens to hundreds of FBI/CIA employees at Wikipedia

Anonymous No. 16299176

How do we fight against this?

Anonymous No. 16299259

>>16297933
Kalergi's Pan-European idea was to form a wall of unity against Russia, which had just been couped by communism. Tell me what you think you mean by "Kalergi Plan"

Anonymous No. 16299272

>>16298181
How would making an account resolve my beef with wikipedia? A website that built its reputation on crowd-sourcing is now anti-crowd-sourcing. The people involved need to be removed from their self-ascribed duties.

Anonymous No. 16299284

>>16298187
thought fart thought

Anonymous No. 16299289

I'm issuing a directive. 8 BTC to whoever removes these people in a non violent way.
>Materialscientist
>Orangemike
>Drmies
>Staraction

Anonymous No. 16299305

>>16281690
Science & Math?
This isn't either reddit or wikipedia...
Go back.

Anonymous No. 16299311

>>16299305
Go back where?

Anonymous No. 16299551

>>16288812
You are a tranny. Your opinion is worth shit

Anonymous No. 16300952

>>16298271
>but the US literally does the same thing
they don't. china is open and honest about what it's doing, usa shamefully hides it