🧵 Paper rejected, another paper with my core idea is already published
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 04:18:37 UTC No. 16283153
Hi, today i've received the notification that my paper was not accepted for a conference. The subject is AI.
I submited this paper in april, and between this day and today another paper has been published with the same core idea as mine. Mine was not published on Arxiv, and now i don't know what to do with that paper since the other paper is better. Can you help me please ?
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 04:19:54 UTC No. 16283154
>>15833839
>Reminder: /sci/ is for discussing topics pertaining to science and mathematics, not for helping you with your homework or helping you figure out your career path.
>If you want advice regarding college/university or your career path, go to /adv/ - Advice.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 04:31:55 UTC No. 16283159
>>16283154
Oh so i can't ask questions about the scientific process on /sci/ ?
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:07:24 UTC No. 16283352
Bump
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 10:29:09 UTC No. 16283374
>>16283153
Your reviewer must have been the author of that other paper. That's really unlucky. You can try to cite the other paper, explain why yours is actually different, and try another conference. There are so many journals and conferences that one will accept it, even if it is practically the same as the one already published. You will not be getting many citations, or maybe any, but least you'll have something published.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:00:31 UTC No. 16283502
>>16283153
Sounds like you got fucking Zhang et al.'d, white boy. How does that yellow cock taste?
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:24:39 UTC No. 16283518
>>16283153
Copy paste it here and add an ethereum address in the name field
Gunna chromadb, langchain huggingface bigscience/bloom this shit
Simping for rep is a thing of the past, get paid by being pertient to sci based llm queryies.
4Hkt
Perfect name
Kek
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:38:46 UTC No. 16283532
This is normal. Sounds like your idea fucking sucks (it's probably a garbo LLM paper) and you are a newb (as evidence that's you're complaining about this) and you get less compute than zhang for good results.
Maybe try doing something more original next time.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:45:33 UTC No. 16283543
>>16283153
Kill yourself
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 15:07:25 UTC No. 16283566
Post it
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 15:14:34 UTC No. 16283574
>>16283543
what's wrong with you
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:34:09 UTC No. 16284125
>>16283153
If the other paper is better than yours, then why does society need yours to be published
>I need to publish it for myself, not for society
seflish, innit? typical scientist.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 23:15:18 UTC No. 16284234
>>16283153
since you can't make money on it, dump it here. no sense in letting all that time working on it go to waste.
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 23:20:22 UTC No. 16284238
>>16283574
your paper was rejected. that is a great dishonor and the only honorable thing to do is kill yourself
Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 23:24:20 UTC No. 16284243
>>16283153
Have you considered that papers on the subject of AI should be Arxived infra 200 or 800? Maybe you tried to misclassify yours infra 500