Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:38:13 UTC No. 16284048

>>16283962
Resonance cascade!!!!

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:57:17 UTC No. 16284073

They aren't. There definitionally can't be. There can be patterns *within* primes, but not for them.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:13:01 UTC No. 16284091

I have found a pattern. All primes are divisible by exactly 4 integers.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:14:18 UTC No. 16284093

>>16283962
Suddenly I have great interest in this retarded "sport"

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:18:16 UTC No. 16284097

>>16284073
Eratosthenes downdooted your post.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:22:12 UTC No. 16284103

It benefits those of us who work with radio frequencies/EM and I think most people would say we benefit humanity unless they are really big on "5G gives you cancer" or something. If we got to the point where we just had a single equation to watch out for, it would make a number of systems more reliable.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:25:07 UTC No. 16284108

>>16284091
well done

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 22:12:19 UTC No. 16284183

>>16283962
RSA encryption relies on large numbers not being "easily" factored into a product of primes. If there's a pattern then whoever finds it breaks RSA.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 22:35:12 UTC No. 16284205

>>16284073
>There definitionally can't be.
Why

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 23:28:45 UTC No. 16284247

>>16283962
>Why are mathematicians so obsessed with finding a pattern for prime numbers? How does it benefit humanity?

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:46:09 UTC No. 16286128

>>16284073
The zeroes of the Reimann Zeta function generate the prime counting function

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 07:10:31 UTC No. 16286144

>>16283962
>benefit humanity
Mathematicians are essentialy playing a game for the fun of it, nothing to do with helping people.

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 07:42:49 UTC No. 16286179

>>16284205
>Why
Because each higher prime creates a new pattern which disrupts any pattern in all lower primes. 3 is prime because it's not divisible by 2. 5 is prime because it's not divisible by 2 and 3. And so on and so forth. It'd be like finding a pattern in the digits of pi.

>>16286128
I said there's no patterns for primes. I didn't say there's no pattern in the frequency of primes.

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 12:37:22 UTC No. 16287101

>>16284183
it'd be the end of Bitchcoin, kek

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:43:52 UTC No. 16287258

>>16286179
Frequency of primes over what range? If it approaches the prime counting function with arbitrary precision, I don't see the difference between that function for the "frequency of primes" and the primes themselves. Unless you mean something different by patterns in the primes?

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:47:46 UTC No. 16287264

131 = prime
1331 = not prime
13331 = prime
133331 = not prime
1333331 = prime
13333331 = not prime
Etc...

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:35:12 UTC No. 16287332

>>16283962
since when did humanity benefit mathematicians more than we benefitted them?
maybe shut the fuck up if we want to playing with prime numbers you fucking baboon
don't even try to bother understanding us or worse rationalize us with the ratios of apes.

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 17:12:09 UTC No. 16287451

>>16287101
it'd be the end of a lot more than just memecoins, friend

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 17:29:31 UTC No. 16287470

>>16283962
stupid. there is an exact formula for primes. search it up.

Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 13:13:07 UTC No. 16288357

>>16283962
Nobody knows how maths benefit us in the future because then itd be the present

Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 13:21:44 UTC No. 16288367

i just cummed in this thread's ass and it's gonna deliver my buttbaby. thank God for israel

Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 13:45:36 UTC No. 16288383

Number theory is vast and applicable to many fields of math. You can draw connections to calculus for example. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_number_theory

Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 13:48:22 UTC No. 16288385

>>16283962
What? You're still looking for it dumbasses? There's and algo that generates primenumbers in order, without division, it just takes previous numbers from since when last "censored special event" occured in their differential analysis, and produces every prime number.

People ignored it when I made it. Fuck you very much, fuck you too.

Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 13:50:15 UTC No. 16288386

>>16283962
>>16288383
As an aside, many concepts of math were discovered before they had any “real” use. Matrices for example have been around for ages and perhaps the first real life use (beyond solving linear systems) came with quantum mechanics.