Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:19:53 UTC No. 16284017

Life history strategy (batemans principle). Inkwells try to make some moralistic argument about feminism with this, but in reality both sexes just seek maximum darwinian advantage like always

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:26:35 UTC No. 16284030

>>16284017
Throughout human history, most women reproduced but only a fraction of men did. Now around 50% of women will never had a child. Perhaps that means in a couple of generations the women who cause the distribution in OP's image will be eliminated from the gene pool but this outcome is quite unusual historically speaking.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:36:44 UTC No. 16284046

>>16284002
The sex which invests the most in reproduction selects, the other competes.

>>16284030
Dysgenic breeding will collapse civilisation in 300 years. But perhaps the women’s standards over this period will drop.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:38:26 UTC No. 16284049

>>16284002
Women are worse at self-reporting their behavior and preferences than men are. Their cushy and coddled lives afford them the luxury of not needing to learn how to conduct thorough self-analysis or introspection. As a result, they are phenomenally ignorant about their own behavior and tendencies. This allows them to make fantastical claims which don't reflect reality. For example, when asked, most women claim that they wouldn't date a man who's less than 6 feet, 6 figures, and 6 inches. But in reality, 95% of women settle for less than this and are happy.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:38:44 UTC No. 16284050

>>16284002
Simple capitalism. Sperm is cheap, eggs are not.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:40:10 UTC No. 16284052

men follow the pareto distribution, women follow the normal. Sucks to suck.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:45:00 UTC No. 16284059

>>16284049
>and are happy
lol

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:45:17 UTC No. 16284060

>>16284002
Men are better rateists than women.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:23:32 UTC No. 16284105

Both of these are accurate and women are just objectively better than men.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:32:44 UTC No. 16284124

>>16284030
>Now around 50% of women will never had a child
I wanted to find a source for this, so I tallied up the data from here
https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2022/04/fertility-rates-declined-for-younger-women-increased-for-older-women.html
and actually got closer to only 34-41% of women ever having children. And this isn't accounting for multiple births.

Also as a side-note
>While fertility rates broadly declined in the United States from 1990-2019, there was a mini baby boom in the early 2000s.
>This increase was driven by foreign-born Hispanic women.
lol lmao

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:40:35 UTC No. 16284133

>>16284002
Now survey the intramural perception of attractiveness: you'll find that women overrate their men and men underrate their women.

Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 01:43:10 UTC No. 16284386

>>16284002
women look better than men on average

Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 04:06:53 UTC No. 16284512

>>16284030
Women would rather end their bloodline than mate with an average man.

Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 04:19:55 UTC No. 16284523

>>16284002
Women wear ridiculous amounts of make-up and put extreme effort into their physical attraction, except those that will not stop eating.

Anonynous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 04:48:44 UTC No. 16284534

>>16284133
>fascist
Tell me about this man.

Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 06:54:17 UTC No. 16284600

>>16284002
Women vs the central limit theorem

Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 07:22:34 UTC No. 16284613

princess syndrome

Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:28:28 UTC No. 16284927

>>16284030
lol
lmao
dumb women reproduce waaay more than intelligent women. And while dumb men reproduce more than intelligent men, successful men ( which intelligence is correlated with ) are more popular with women and so have more opportunity to reproduce.
The distribution is going to get even worse.

Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:32:54 UTC No. 16284933

>>16284927
Depends on religiosity. For religious women, the highly intelligent ones reproduce more than the dumb ones. For the non-religious, the highly intelligence women might as well have been born without reproductive organs because their rate of producing babies is so low. Dumb non-religious women reproduce at about the same rate at dumb religious women. If you want a bunch of kids, find a high IQ religious woman.

Anonymous at Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:37:43 UTC No. 16284946

>>16284613
lol the fuglies are so lonely they actually respond to bait accounts.

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 01:35:32 UTC No. 16285876

>>16284600
KEK

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:13:33 UTC No. 16286090

>>16284002
Men look most women as attractive or average.
Women see most men as ugly and really tiny fraction as attractive.
Today women and men physical attractive is far inferior than paleolitic period, men just like women and women really like full development men.

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:54:49 UTC No. 16286415

female mortality should have been considered t obe higher